之前金陵晚报报道的张艺谋陷入宣传片剽窃一事引发了不同舆论观点的碰撞：一方面一些网友强烈谴责张艺谋；另一方面许多网友持冷静观望态度，等作家鲜琦举出铁证再判断；同时，也有一部分读者力挺张艺谋。

Before the evening news reported in zhang jinling promotional sparked public opinion about the plagiarism different views of the collision：On the one hand some net friend strongly condemned the director zhang yimou；On the other hand, many net friend the calm on the fence，Writers such as fresh and determine what zhan backed up；At the same time，Also have part of the reader's zhang force。

　　日前，一位女士拨通本报电话，向记者表达了她“张艺谋功大于过”的观点。记者也就《新桃花源记》的改编与版权问题咨询了律师。

a，A lady went to the telephone our newspaper，To reporter expressed her“Zhang yimou power greater than before”Point of view。Xinhua also《Reviewing the new record》Adaptation and copyright problem consultation with the lawyer。

　　读者：不应抹杀张艺谋功劳 readers：Should not kill zhang yimou credit

　　此前张艺谋深陷铁道部天价宣传片一事，公众对他的质疑和批评声音就不绝于耳，张艺谋也就此回应称自己必须反思。

In the previous day's feature films zhang，The public is questioned and criticized for his voice is heard，Zhang said his response from must reflect on。

　　一波未平一波又起，成都宣传片被曝剽窃也让大家对张艺谋的质疑更甚。

A wave surging after another，Chengdu promo be exposed to the plagiarism also let everybody to zhang questioned what more。

　　然而在舆论大流中，也有一派观点力挺张艺谋，日前一位女读者给记者打来电话，表达了她个人的看法。“我觉得张艺谋总的来说是功大于过的，2008年奥运会的开幕式，他导的多有气势啊！为中国争了很多光，大大提升了我们国家的影响力！我觉得他的这些功劳是不能够被磨灭的。不能因为他拍了铁道部宣传片就一并抹杀他之前的所作所为。再说了，哪个人不会犯点错呢？”

But in the opinion of the flow，Also there was a school of hard zhang view，Has a female readers to reporters calling，Expressed her personal views。“I think zhang yimou generally is greater than work，The opening ceremony of the Olympic Games in 2008，He more than the powerful ah！For China argue a lot of light，Greatly promoted the influence of our country！I think he is not able to be these credit fade。Not because he took mor will diminish his promotional together before did。besides，Which one would not have made some wrong？”

　　同时，她也对作家鲜琦此时曝光这件事的目的产生了怀疑，“如果真的是剽窃，九年前为什么不说呢？即便当时张艺谋话语权强，但我相信只要你有真凭实据肯定会讨到公道的！他自己也说了，因为现在张艺谋被卷入到铁道部宣传片事件，他才重提当年的事，这不就是落井下石吗？”

At the same time，She also told writer fresh at this purpose at this time exposure suspect，“If it really is plagiarism，Why not say nine years ago？Even when zhang strong voice，But I believe that as long as you have ZhenPingShiJu will please to moderate！He also said，Because now zhang was involved in the mor promo events，He was told that year，Is not this fall？”

　　律师：版权官司无明确标准 lawyer：Copyright lawsuit without clear standards

　　记者昨天联系到江苏倍宁得律师事务所的孙永标律师，就此事中的版权问题咨询了他。

The journalist to jiangsu times contact choice of law firm SunYongBiao lawyer，The copyright problem of consulting him。

　　一般提到的剽窃、抄袭，大多存在于同一载体之间，比如两篇文章的内容雷同、两支乐曲的旋律相似等等，像鲜琦这样文学作品被改编成了宣传片是否也属于侵犯改编权呢？针对记者的疑问，孙律师做了明确解答：“也是侵权。改编权中说得很明白，一种情况是不改变原来类型的改编；另一种是在不改变作品内容的情况下改编成另一种类型，比如说将小说改编成剧本。”

Generally the mention of the plagiarism、copying，Most exists on the same carrier between，For instance two article content identical、Two music melody similar, and so on，Like fresh zhan such literary works were adapted for feature films also belong to infringe upon whether emobodied？According to the reporter's question，Sun made specific answer lawyer：“Is tort。In emobodied clear，A kind of circumstance is not change original type of adaptation；Another kind is not changing the works of content adaptation into another type，For example the novel is adapted from a script。”

　　如今最大的问题是张艺谋所拍的宣传片《成都，一座来了就不想离开的城市》是否确实抄袭了《新桃花源记》。

Now the biggest problem is that some of the zhang commercial《chengdu，A come just don't want to leave the city》Is really copying《Reviewing the new record》。

　　孙律师表示，如果要证实这点除了相关证据外还必须满足两个必要条件，“一、原作品一定要有它的独特性，如果只是成都的景点、历史典故二者相同，那这不构成剽窃，因为成都人都知道；二、一定要确定张艺谋能接触到原著。鉴于《新桃花源记》之前已经发表，并且媒体有过报道，那么张艺谋很有可能之前看过。”孙律师称，这些只是从理论上分析，如果鲜琦真的将张艺谋告上法庭，那么将要在法庭上给出非常详细、明确的证据。他也称关于版权问题的官司通常比较复杂，“这不像论文，可以检测重复率。现在没有一个非常明确的标准来判定作品什么地方算剽窃，剽窃了多少。这一切得通过法官个人来定夺。”

Sun lawyer said，If want to confirm that in addition to the relevant evidence must meet two necessary conditions，“a、The original work must have its uniqueness，If only the scenic spot of chengdu、Historical allusion two the same，That it's not plagiarism，Because the chengdu people know；two、Be sure to zhang can access to original works。In view of the《Reviewing the new record》Been published before，And the media have reported，So zhang is likely to have seen before。”Sun lawyer says，These are analyzed theoretically，If fresh zhan really will zhang yimou to court，You will give very detailed in court、Clear evidence。He also called on the copyright problem of the lawsuit usually is more complex，“It's not like paper，Can detect repeat rate。Now not a very specific standards to determine what works is plagiarism，Plagiarism how much。This all have to go through the judge to determine individual。”

　　记者 陆一夫

Reporter LiuYi husband