对学位论文作假者撤销学位，3年内不得接受其学位申请；指导教师将承担包括暂停招生、取消导师资格直至解除聘任等处理——教育部新近公开的学位论文作假行为暂行处理办法征求意见稿，制裁措施相当明确和严厉。

    To ZuoJiaZhe degree thesis cancellation degree，3 years shall not accept the application for degree；Teachers will take the responsibility for including the suspension of recruit students、Cancel the teacher qualification until terminate employment processing-the ministry of education of the newly public degree thesis interim treatment method of fraud drafts，Sanctions quite clear and strict。

    从严从紧的处罚办法，对于一些正在为戴上学位帽而打拼苦熬、撰写论文的年轻学子，必然具有一定的震慑与警戒作用，整个社会更应乐观其成。每年发表的学术论文与授出的学位数量惊人地“繁荣”，但论文“注水”、“泡沫”现象令人痛心，不同范围内被揭发的论文作假、学术不端案例之多，令人蒙羞。

    Strictly from the tight punishment measures，For some are for wear degree cap and beat GuAo、Papers young students，Inevitably has the certain awe and alert function，The whole society should be more optimistic approve。The academic papers published each year and grant a staggering number of degree“prosperity”，But paper“Water injection”、“bubble”Phenomenon is painfully，The different range of paper on a false、Misconduct cases，A shame。

    但如何有效监管、打击学术作假行为，是一个值得反思和探讨的问题。近些年，从国务院学位办公室到教育部乃至中科院、国家自然基金评选等相关系统，针对学术腐败、论文成果作假等行为，增加了不少筛查过滤、上网公示等把关程序，也制定了各种惩治不端行为的威慑措施。各高校学生学位论文的学术规范教育和审查，也渐渐从严从紧，类似教育部这样的学位论文处理办法，包括导师的“连坐”，在许多高校的校规章程里都有明确规定，监督和处理的执行机构大多已建立。然而这些，似乎都没能彻底阻止“天下文章一大抄”的风气盛行，“注水学位论文”仍在批量问世，严规高悬下的“大棒轻举”现象，尤其堪忧。

    But how effective supervision、Blow academic fraud，Is a deserves reflection and explored。In recent years，The state council office to the ministry of education degree from the Chinese academy of sciences and even、The national natural fund selection and related systems，According to academic corruption、Results the behavior such as false papers，Increased many screening filtering、Internet access control procedures such as public，Also established all sorts of punishment for misconduct deterrence measures。Each college students' academic standard education degree thesis and review，Gradually, the strict tight，Similar to the ministry of education of the way to handle this dissertation，Including tutor's“pants”，Many colleges and universities in the school's rules have specific provision in the constitution，Supervision and treatment of actuators are established。However, the，Seem to have failed to completely stop“All the articles a copy”The custom of popular，“Water injection degree thesis”Still in the mass market，YanGui under the brand“Stick make”phenomenon，Especially bullish。

    作为学术不端行为直接责任单位的大学、科研机构乃至学位论文的指导教师，在某种意义上，也是作假者的“同盟军”。在网上检索无所不能的今天，发现论文造假行为本不是难事。但担心自身形象受损的大学等机构，多半将“民不举官不究”和“家丑不可外扬”当作学术造假案例的第一条处置原则，对于学术含金量普遍不高又关乎学生就业、学校声望的学位论文尤其如此。专家的较真让位于人情世故，导师“连坐”多半变异为包庇护短。学术道德与风气，就在这样的姑息敷衍中被放纵败坏，一些大学的学术声誉和育人水准，也在这样“捂盖子”里陷入危机。

    As an academic misconduct directly responsible units of the university、Scientific research institutions and even degree thesis to the guidance of teachers，In a sense，ZuoJiaZhe is also the“Allies”。In the online retrieval omnipotent today，This paper found frauds is not hard。But worry about their image of the university and other institutions damaged，typically“People will not lift up officer not investigate”and“Wash your dirty linen in public”As the first case academic misconducts disposal principles，For academic value generally not tall and for students to obtain employment、The school prestigious degree thesis especially such。Experts in the struggle to see the world，mentor“pants”Most for shield HuDuan variation。Academic morality and ethos，In this kind of destruction be indulgence palliative perfunctory，Some of the college academic reputation and education level，Also in such“WuGaiZi”In crisis in。

    改变现状，“秘诀”恐怕在于认真研究如何建立超越利益相关主体、行之有效的监督审查机制。法度严明固然重要，实际执行时有法必依、执法必严、违法必究，保持法度的严肃有效，才是根本。这样说，适用的绝不只是打击学术作假一端。

    To change the status quo，“secret”I'm afraid is to study how to establish beyond interest related subject、Effective supervision and examination mechanism。The strict laws is important，The actual execution of the laws、eleventh、be，Keep the serious effective testimonies，Is fundamental。That said，Applicable not just blow academic false end。

    拿高学位、从事学术研究者当是社会的精英与道德中坚，大学科研机构正应是社会理性良知的集中地。改变现状，根本上说，是要改变整个社会、每所大学、每位学者对于教育、科研领域所抱持的急功近利立场。惟有真正将学术道德、学术规范视为建设创新型国家、提高全民族文化素质和自主创新能力的基础，才能摆脱“学术GDP”的盲目攀高，让坚守学术道德变为自发自觉。（姜泓冰）

    Take high degree、Engaged in academic researchers as social elite and moral backbone，University research institutes are should be social reason conscience Windows。To change the status quo，ultimately，Is to change the whole society、Each university decides what、Each scholar for education、Scientific research field of took a quick position。But the real will academic morality、Academic norms as building the innovative country、Enhance the whole nation culture quality and the ability of independent innovation foundation，To get rid of“Academic GDP”Of the blind，Let the stick to academic morality into a spontaneous consciously。（JiangHongBing）