长春亚泰俱乐部前天发表一份所谓“公开声明”，指责广州媒体跟队记者上周末在长春客场采访时推打女大学生志愿者。但当晚广东电视台体育频道播放了一段现场拍摄的视频影像，随后广州当事记者通过视频影像资料对“声明”中明显存在的事实谬误进行了回应，说明了“公开声明”谎话连篇。

Changchun for both the club the day before yesterday issued a so-called“Public statements”，Accused of guangzhou media reporters in changchun with team last weekend away behind an interview with female college students volunteer。But the guangdong TV sports channel broadcast a section on location of the video image，Then the parties to guangzhou reporter through the video image data for“statement”There is an obvious fact that the fallacy of response，Illustrates the“Public statements”bullshit。

　　广州记者昨天已通过正式渠道向中超联赛理事会执行局局长刘殿秋、中国足协新闻办主任董华提起申诉，中国足协的调查人员已经分别致电长春市足协和当事记者，调查18日发生在长春赛区的记者采访受阻事件。中国足协表示，对于记者无法进入规定采访区域工作一事表示高度关注，并将切实保障记者在中超各赛区的采访权益。

Guangzhou reporters yesterday is through the official channels to the super league director of the council of LiuDianQiu Nevada、The Chinese football association, director of the office DongHua mention appeal，The Chinese football association has been respectively investigators at changchun football association and the parties to reporter，Survey 18 happened in changchun division reporters hindered event。The Chinese football association said，Unable to access provisions for reporters interviewed the work area said high attention，And will earnestly safeguard reporter in the super each division interview rights。

　　8月20日晚间刊发的来自亚泰俱乐部的所谓“公开声明”，昨天不但没有任何长春本地媒体跟进报道，而且在亚泰俱乐部官网以及俱乐部官方微博都没有任何痕迹。这不由得让人怀疑，这则声明是否得到了亚泰俱乐部官方的认可？或者这只是个别人自作聪明的主张？

On August 20, published the evening from both the so-called club“Public statements”，Yesterday, not only do not have any changchun local media reported follow up，And in both the club's official website and the club's official micro bo all have no any trace。This can't help make people suspect，This is whether the statement for both the club official recognition？Or it's just individuals that wise？

　　据悉，在8月20日晚间，国内不少媒体都收到了由长春亚泰俱乐部一位副总从个人实名邮箱发出的主题为“广州记者挑起事端、歪曲报道的事实经过”的公关邮件，在这份正文写着“请帮忙发稿”的邮件中，附件有3篇稿件，分别名为《推打辱骂女大学生志愿者，广州个别不良记者行为令人羞愧》、《广州记者挑起事端、歪曲报道的事实经过》和《长春女大学生志愿者强烈要求广州不良媒体记者公开道歉》。记者注意到，3篇文章均未有实名署名，落款仅为“长春记者良知”。这封邮件随后被网友截图放到微博上，大量网友进行评论和转发。有网友质疑：“如果是俱乐部自己官方发的声明，那为什么没有正式的落款和签章？而如果是记者的调查，为什么又通过俱乐部的高管向媒体发通稿，而且不署真名，真是匪夷所思。”

It is reported，On August 20, the evening，Some Chinese media are received by changchun for both the club a deputy from personal mailbox rule out the theme of“Guangzhou reporter trailing、Misrepresent facts after”Pr mail，In this text written“Please help the time”In the mail to the，Accessories have three manuscripts submitted，Called respectively《Behind the abuse of female college students volunteer，Guangzhou individual bad reporter behavior a shame》、《Guangzhou reporter trailing、Misrepresent facts after》and《Changchun female college students volunteer urge guangzhou bad media reporter a public apology》。Reporter noticed，Three articles are not real name signature，Badging is only“Changchun reporter conscience”。This email is then net friend screenshots on micro blog，A large number of Internet users comments and forwarding。Netizens question：“If the club official hair statement，Why not officially badging and signature？And if it is the reporter's investigation，Why again through the club's executives to the media through the hair，And don't department real name，Is really fantastic。”

　　此行为是否代表亚泰俱乐部的官方态度目前尚不可知，但广东电视台的视频已经戳穿该声明的谎言，例如，亚泰声明中称广州记者没有出示证件，但广东电视台视频显示所有广州记者都佩戴由公安部与中国足协核准颁发的中超联赛采访证件，而长春经开体育场记者席的确是被非记者霸占。昨天中午，有记者致电长春亚泰俱乐部了解情况，但俱乐部相关负责人拒绝回应。(记者 李斌)

This behavior is a club for both the official attitude is still unknown，But guangdong TV video has been through the statement of lies，For example，Both statement said guangzhou reporter didn't produce their certificates，But guangdong TV video show all guangzhou reporters are worn by the ministry of public security and approved and issued by the Chinese football association super league interview documents，And changchun the open stadium gallery is indeed by a reporter commandeer。At noon yesterday，A reporter for both club at changchun know the situation，But the club refused to respond to the relevant person in charge。(Reporter li bin)