以2万元来计算的话，平均每个风景区的综合票价接近150元之多。这些风景区的主要游览者是经济条件尚不属太好的国内游客。而国外的不少著名景区，参观者多是富裕阶层，收费却远远低于我们的不少5A景区。如美国黄石国家公园步行门票只要75元，科罗拉多大峡谷63元，法国卢浮宫85元，而日本的富士山甚至完全免费。为何同样级别、同等质量及配套设施和服务水平的国内景区门票要贵出这么多呢？试想一下，如果徐霞客诞生在今日，怕是无力负担这么昂贵的游费，其足迹也到不了这么多的地方。

With 20000 yuan to calculate words,Average each scenic spot comprehensive fare nearly 150 yuan more than the.The scenic area of the main visitors is economic condition is still not of the very good domestic tourists.And foreign many famous scenic spot,Visitors are rich class,Charge far below our many 5 a scenic spot.Such as Yellowstone national park, USA walk tickets were only $75,Colorado grand canyon is 63 yuan,Louvre, France is 85 yuan,And Japan's Mount Fuji even completely free.Why the same level/The same quality and supporting facilities and service level of domestic scenic spot ticket to your out so much??Just think,If xu was born in today,I'm afraid so unable to afford expensive tour fee,The footprint is also not to so many places.

　　其实，国家对于景区的价格也有相关的控制手段，那就是三年一周期的“限涨令”。其初衷是防止那些“皇帝女儿不愁嫁”的4A、5A景区依靠资源、经营和管理垄断，连年快速地涨价。孰料在实际执行中却异化成了三年一次的合理合法的“涨价令”。如此一来，民众的收入增长水平无论如何也快不过这些名山大川的身价翻倍速度。

In fact,The state scenic spot price also has relevant control methods,It is a period of three years"Limit up to".Its purpose is to prevent those"The emperor married daughter not sorrow"4 a/5 a scenic spot rely on resources/Operation and management monopoly,Years of rapid price increases.ShuLiao in the actual execution but alienation became three years a legitimate"Rise in price to".so,People's income growth level anyway also fast but these famous mountains and great rivers is worth double speed.

　　笔者认为，造成我国著名景区票价不断上涨、票价水平与国民收入严重不匹配的关键因素，就在于我们的旅游资源往往被地方政府看成了谋取更多经济利益的一个支点，一棵上天赐予的摇钱树。

The author thinks that,Result in the famous scenic spot ticket prices rising/Fare level and national income serious don't match the key factors,Lies in our tourism resources are often seen as the local government for more economic benefits a fulcrum,A tree god-given cash cow.

　　众所周知，国内5A级景区中一半以上是自然风景名胜，如瀑布、峡谷、大山、大河等，这些旅游资源本质上都是一种公共资源和自然资源，是经历了千百年历史的沉淀而属于全体国民的遗产和瑰宝，而非属于某省、某市的私产。地方政府作为景区的维护和管理单位，虽然承担着景区自负盈亏的责任，但也不能如此不合理地设定票价，而是应当取之有理并用之有道。

As is known to all,Domestic 5 a grade scenic spot is more than half of the natural scenic spots,Such as falls/canyon/dashan/The river, etc,These tourism resources in essence is a kind of public resources and natural resources,Gone through a history of one thousand years precipitation and belongs to all the national heritage and treasure,Rather than belongs to the province/Integral private property.The local government as the maintenance and management unit,Although the bear the scenic spot the responsibility of responsible for their own profits and losses,But not so unreasonably set fares,But ought to take the rational and youdao.

　　景区票价内含着辩证关系。价高了自然会让游客减少，相应的食、宿等相关产业均会受到一定的影响。而门票价格合理的话，自然会引来更多的游客，从而推动一个地方的整体发展，这就是笔者前面所说的“支点”。

The fare is consonant with dialectical relationship.The high price of the natural will let visitors to reduce,Corresponding food/Accommodation and other related industries are will be affected by certain effect.And ticket price reasonable words,Nature will cause more tourists,So as to promote the overall development of the one place,This is the author mentioned before"support".

　　所以，对于地方政府来说，要做的就是努力平衡好这一支点，要更有眼光地看到未来而不是仅限于眼前。不能把公共的旅游资源当作是自己的私产，想涨价就涨价；而是应当制定符合国民收入水平的票价，通过经济手段来保护旅游资源，让旅游资源能够留给世世代代的子孙。否则人们受制于经济条件而无力游览的话，岂不是要让徐霞客成为中国地理名人堂中的孤客了？ (来源：【字号：大)

so,For the local government for,To do is to balance the fulcrum,Want to have more eye to see the future, but not limited to eyes.Can't put public tourism resources as their own private property,Want to rise in price will rise in price;But shall formulate accord with national income level of fare,Through the economic means to protect tourism resources,Make tourism resources can be left to the children of generations to come.Otherwise people subject to economic conditions and cannot visit words,Will he not let xu become China's geographic hall of fame in the solitary guest? (source:[size:big)