网上“民意代表”的意见有些一边倒。有网友调侃道，“昆明人你们真善良啊，但滇池污染真不是我们游客干的。”“以后会不会有昆明空气补偿费，凡在昆明行政区域内呼吸的都交钱？”网友“燕京盛世”说，“昆明此举不可取。如果条例被通过，全国效仿，今后各地可能都会向游客征收空气费、阳光费。”

online“Representatives of”Opinion some one-sided。Netizens poking fun way，“Kunming people you really good ah，But dianchi lake pollution is not tourists dry。”“Later will not have kunming air compensation，And in kunming administrative areas of breathing in money？”the“Yanjing saatchi”said，“Kunming it is advisable。If the regulations，Follow the，All the tourists in the future will air fee collection、Sunshine fee。”

　　“谈判沟通专家潘黎”称，“典型的前人污染后人买单！为何我们不把收费创意用在污染治理上？为何我们要用行政收费治污？收费之后就能解决污染问题？缴费客人是否有权知道和监督费用流向和滇池流域治污情况。我们宁可捐款千元给滇池治污，也不愿被收费治污！”

“Negotiations PanLi communication experts”says，“The typical predecessors pollution pay later generations！Why do we not to charge in creative use on pollution？Why do we need to use administrative fees for performance？After charging can solve the problem of pollution？Capture expends the guests are entitled to know and monitor expenses flow, and welcomed the dianchi lake watershed。We would rather donated one thousand yuan RMB to frequent dianchi lake，Also don't want to be charged performance！”

　　可能料到网民会质疑，云南省政府法制办主任祁希元在当天的会上就表示，生活在滇池流域的每一个人，既是滇池的污染者，又是滇池污染的受害者，更是滇池治理的责任者和受益者。通过立法开征此费，有利于增强全民保护滇池意识，引导企业严格遵守保护环境法律法规，以最小的环境成本获得最大的经济效益，建立稳定长效投入机制。

May expect Internet users will be questioned，The legislative QiXiYuan, director of the provincial government on the day of the meeting said，Life in the dianchi lake watershed to everyone，Is the dianchi lake polluters，And the victims of the dianchi lake pollution，The governance of dianchi lake is understood and the beneficiaries。Through collecting the legislation this fee，To strengthen the protection consciousness of dianchi lake，Guide enterprises to strictly abide by environment protection laws and regulations，With a minimum of environment cost for maximum economic benefits，To establish a stable long-term investment mechanism。

　　对于云南省政府法制办的说法，云南大学教授金子强持不同意见。他认为，“收取滇池生态资源补偿费的治理思路，有新意但不切实际。”他说，首先如果滇池周围的宾馆污染了滇池，应该是宾馆搬迁，而不是向住客收费。其次，治理污染是政府的职能，如今却要把职能摊派给民众负担，这不合理。金子强称，“我对变着法向游客强征所谓古城维护费、生态资源补偿费的作法，非常不以为然！”

For the provincial government that concerned，Yunnan university professor JinZiJiang hold different opinions。He thinks，“Ecological resource compensation for the management of dianchi lake ideas，Have new idea but impractical。”He said，First of all if the dianchi lake dianchi lake pollution around the hotel，Should be hotel move，Residents not to charge。second，The pollution control is the function of the government，But now the function to apportion public burden，It's not reasonable。JinZiJiang says，“I BianZhaoFa forcing visitors to the so-called ancient city maintenance fee、Ecological resource compensation of practice，Very to disagree！”

　　争论还在继续，已经有外地游客关心何时收费了。8月3日，昆明市滇池管理局官员郑涛回应称，该条例是由云南省政府法制办牵头，省、市10多个部门共同参与拟订的，只是草案，尚未实施。下步要经云南省人大审议通过后才会开展相关工作。

Debate continues，Tourists have been concerned about when to charge。August 3,，Kunming dianchi lake administration officials responded that zheng，This is the law by the provincial government to lead the legislative，province、The city more than 10 departments jointly participate in the draft，Just draft，Not yet implemented。The next step is to review by yunnan province people's congress will develop through relevant work。

　　有人算过一笔账，昆明市旅游局统计数据显示，昆明2011年接待海内外游客超4000万人次。按此计算，每名游客在昆明住上一天，就可以为治理和保护“滇池生态资源”贡献4亿元。

Someone calculate on a bill，Kunming tourism administration figures show，Kunming 2011 tourists super 40 million passengers。According to the calculation，Each tourists in the kunming for a day，For management and protection“Ecological resources dianchi lake”Contribute 400 million yuan。