几天前，大殿刚刚被拆就有网友把照片传到了网上。一时之间，拆殿之举引来一片惋惜声。

A few days ago，Hall has just been removed have net friend get photos to the Internet。Between a，An open house from a piece of regret sound。

　　虽然大殿几经焚毁，不是文物，但这幢历史建筑却留有不少绍兴人的集体记忆。商业开发的同时，如何处理文化古迹？大殿的命运何去何从？这是市民的疑惑。

Although hall burned several times，Cultural relics not，But this a historical building has been left a lot of shaoxing people's collective memory。Business development at the same time，How to deal with cultural sites？The fate of the hall what course to follow？This is public doubts。

　　大殿被拆得只剩下框架 Hall to be taken only framework

　　开元寺曾是座名寺，有近千年的历史，香火旺盛。“相当于《水浒传》里的大相国寺。”当地一位文史专家这样介绍。

, fujiang had is a MingSi，Nearly one thousand years of history，Incense exuberant。“Equivalent to《Water margin》In the DaXiangGuo temple。”A local history experts introduced this。

　　不过，这座古刹命运多舛。近千年来，古刹几经焚毁，到民国时期，已经破败。1974年起，开元寺变身成为医院，大殿也成了输液大厅。这里庭院森森，景色宜人，许多绍兴市民记忆犹新。

but，The ancient star-crossed lovers。Nearly one thousand years，Burned several ancient，To during the period of the republic of，Has ruined。Since 1974，, fujiang change to the hospital，Hall has become infusion hall。Here the garden，Scenery and pleasant，Many shaoxing people remember。

　　直到2007年，医院搬迁新址，这块土地以9亿元的高价被拍卖用作商业开发。

Until 2007，Hospital move to new，The land to the high price 900 million yuan auction used for business development。

　　随后，医院建筑都被拆掉，仅存这座大殿。直到几天前，有市民发现，大殿也开始在拆了。

then，Hospital buildings are being torn down，Only to save the hall。Until a few days ago，People have found，Hall also began in the open。

　　记者在现场看到，大殿的四壁已经被拆，只剩下一个框架，孤零零地屹立，看上去十分凄凉。

Reporters on the scene saw，The walls of the hall has been removed，Only a framework，Standing alone，Look very desolate。

　　“不是文物但有必要保存” “Cultural relics not but it is necessary to save”

　　拆殿的消息，很快在网上传开了。当地著名书法家沈定庵听闻此事的第一感觉是震惊和遗憾。这位80多岁的老人说，开元寺原来很大，现存的大殿经过多次维修，但还是基本保留了原有面貌。“绍兴已经有很多历史古迹变成了照片中的回忆，难道发展经济非得以古迹的"离去"为代价吗？”绍兴县史学会主席傅振照则如此坦言。

House dismantling the news of，Soon spread on the Internet。The local famous calligrapher ShenDingAn heard it first feeling is shocked and regret。The 80 - year - old man said，, fujiang, which was very large，The existing hall after many maintenance，But the basic retained the original face。“Shaoxing has a lot of historical sites into the memories in the photo，Economic development is not to the historic sites"leave"For the price?？”Shaoxing county history association, chairman FuZhenZhao is so said。

　　文史专家裘士雄同样深感惋惜，他说他和许多市民一样，最不愿意看到开元寺毁于我们这一代，并希望开发商为子孙后代着想。

History experts QiuShiXiong also deeply regret，He said he and many city residents as，The most is not willing to see, fujiang destroyed by our generation，And I hope developers think for future generations。

　　在绍兴E网、绍兴网等当地多个论坛上，网民们也发出了“保留大殿”的呼吁。

In shaoxing E net、Shaoxing and more than local on BBS，Internet users are also made“Keep hall”appeal。

　　当地文保部门一位不愿透露姓名的人士介绍，这座大殿虽然不是文物保护单位，但对于有着2500年历史的文化古城绍兴来说，很有必要保护开元寺。“文化遗产的保护不仅仅是保护文保文物，更多的是要保护一些通过有形的建筑物或无形的文化式样，把它有机地连接起来，成为城市的历史文化记忆。从这个意义上说，记忆愈丰富愈深刻，城市文化的积淀也愈深厚。绍兴就是这样一座历史文化名城。”这位人士说。

The local WenBao department who refused to give his name personage introduction，This hall though not units of cultural relics protection，But for a 2500 - year - old culture of the ancient city of shaoxing speaking，It is necessary to protect, fujiang。“Cultural heritage protection is not only WenBao protection of cultural relics，More is to protect some through the tangible building or intangible cultural style，Put it organically link，A city of the historical and cultural memory。In this sense，Memory is the deep rich，City culture accumulation and the more profound。Shaoxing is such a historical and cultural city。”The people said。

　　规划局：按规划不能拆 Planning bureau：According to plan can't split open a

　　面对市民的呼声，17日，记者联系了绍兴市规划局一位负责人。她表示：“按照规划方案，大殿确实是要保留的，不能拆。”

In the face of the voice of citizens，17，Reporter contacted the shaoxing city planning bureau a person in charge。She says：“According to the plan，The hall is really want to keep，Can't split open a。”

　　她介绍，这座殿的命运，也请来过专家论证，当时意见不统一，有的说拆，有的说留。“市政府也开过协调会，经历了很复杂的过程。”“到底怎么办，我们也得看市政府的通知，目前还没有书面的意见。”她这样告诉记者，“但是应该会有个处理结果。”

She introduces，The fate of the house，Also please expert argumentation，When opinions not unified，Some said and，Some said leave。“The municipal government also open a council，Went through a very complicated process。”“Exactly how to do，We also have to look at the notice of the municipal government，There is no written opinion。”She told reporters，“But should have a processing results。”

　　拍下这块土地的是绍兴市国商大厦和绍兴金渔投资有限公司。记者联系到了开发商。“这不是拆除，而是对大殿进行整修。”一位姓潘的人士如此回应，“根据规划要求，开发商不能拆除，但可以对大殿进行内部整修，调整商业用途，现在刚刚完成了前期工作。”

Take the land is shaoxing city trademark buildings and shaoxing JinYu investment co., LTD。Contact reporters to developers。“This is not dismantle，But the hall to refit。”A man surnamed pan people so response，“According to the requirements of the plan，Developers can't dismantle，But to internal hall renovation，Adjustment commercial use，Now just finished the work。”

　　单靠一味的复古做旧，没有丰富的人文内涵，即使投资百亿千亿，造出的也只能是假古董、假古城，既代表不了今天的历史，也无法真正重回旧梦。

Single by blindly to restore ancient ways do old，No rich cultural connotation，Even if the investment of one quintillion，Create also can only be fake antiques、False ancient city，Not only represents the history of today，Can't really be back to your dreams。

　　新华社就多地再造古城事件刊发时评 The xinhua news agency is more ancient city of the event review published

复古是科学决策还是盲目冲动？ Restore ancient ways is the scientific decision or blind impulse？

　　河南开封 “千亿元重建汴梁古都”风波未平，山西大同又传来投资百亿元用五年再造大同古城的消息。同时，多地重修古城墙、明清一条街的举动接连不断……人们发现，“复古归旧梦”仿佛突然成了营造城市兴盛的灵丹妙药，引来争相仿效。但是，如此大手笔复古再造，往往既经不起科学的考量，更引起社会公众越来越深的担忧。

Henan kaifeng “One hundred billion yuan reconstruction BianLiang ancient capital”Storm open，Shanxi datong again came the investment of ten billion yuan RMB with five years of reconstruction of the ancient city of news。At the same time，Many ancient city wall repaired、Ming and qing street move continuously……People found，“Dreams to restore ancient ways”As if suddenly became to build urban prosperity panacea，Imitated from。but，So big the restoring ancient ways，Often both can't afford to scientific consideration，More cause social the public more and more deep concerns。

　　建筑与繁盛，从来有血有肉，决非简单的砖瓦结构。无论是故都汴梁还是古城大同，之所以在文化史册和后人心目中占有地位，是因为它们在特殊的历史时期呈现出的繁荣祥和，从而代表了一段历史。世易时移，单靠一味的复古做旧，没有丰富的人文内涵，即使投资百亿千亿，造出的也只能是假古董、假古城，既代表不了今天的历史，也无法真正重回旧梦。

Architecture and prosperous，Never flesh，Is not simple brick structure。Whether onetime capital BianLiang or ancient city of datong，In the cultural history and the posterity mind possession status，Because they are in the special historical period presents the prosperity and peace，Thus represent a period of history。The easy time shift，Single by blindly to restore ancient ways do old，No rich cultural connotation，Even if the investment of one quintillion，Create also can only be fake antiques、False ancient city，Not only represents the history of today，Can't really be back to your dreams。

　　“罗马不是一天建成的”。城市的发展变迁有其内在规律，并伴随时代发展和社会进步不断注入新的内涵。时代背景、人文精神等内在特质决定了一座城市的性格和血脉，建筑样式和风格不过是城市性格的外露。为仿古而大拆现代建筑，为复古而迁出城市居民，改变市民现有的正常生活，这样的做法，难免有舍本逐末之嫌。

“Rome wasn't built in a day”。The development of the city change has its inherent law，And with the development of The Times and social progress constantly inject new connotation。Era background、The humanistic spirit and other internal characteristics decided to a city's character and blood，Architectural style and the style of the character of the city but is exposed。For antique and big and modern architecture，To restore ancient ways and check out of urban residents，Change the citizens existing normal life，This approach，There is bound to be at the shadow and lose the substance too。

　　值得注意的是，传出再造古城、古都雄伟规划的，不少都是经济欠发达地区。在解决民生难题、提高公共服务水平方面，地方财政并不宽裕，如果在这种仿古复古运动的投入上豪气冲天，这样鲜明的对比又如何能令人民满意？

It is important to note that，Efferent reengineering city、The ancient grand plan，Many are undeveloped areas。In solving the livelihood of the people problem、Improve the level of public service aspect，Local finance is not well，If in this antique restore ancient ways motion input on the heroism，Such sharp contrast how can make people's satisfaction？

　　是科学决策，还是盲目冲动？真正让人担心的是诸多大手笔复古再造工程背后的决策程序问题。城市建设的根本是造福群众。城市再造的巨大投资往往需要地方举债进行，一旦超出承受范围后果难以估量。无数的事实一再表明，决策冲动、论证草率带来的影响往往久久难以弥补。

Is scientific decision，Or blind impulse？Really make people worry about is many big restore ancient ways reengineering behind the decision-making process problems。The root of the urban construction is to benefit the masses。The city of huge investment often need to place on debt，Once beyond the range up to bear the consequences。Countless facts show that again and again，Decision impulse、The effects of hasty argument often is difficult to make up a long time。

　　绚丽旧梦和辉煌历史值得回味，但我们不应一味沉溺于“古都旧梦”。而更应秉持人本理念，务实而量力，将城市发展和市民生活的现实需求作为首要着力点，稳步提升人民群众生活质量，把现代城市建成未来画卷中的亮丽一页。

Beautiful dreams and brilliant history be worth the aftertaste，But we should not blindly indulge in“Refreshment of ancient capital”。And more shall uphold the humanistic idea，Practical ability and，The urban development and the people's living needs of the reality as a primary focus，Steadily improved people's quality of life，The modern city built in the future picture scroll bright one page。