一把手直属专用:01056292228转800   舆论引导:01056292228转802   综合治理:01056292228转805   品牌安全与提升:01056292228转808
您当前的位置:亲稳网 > 中国亲稳 > 亲稳行业 > 亲稳旅游 >

即刻使用亲民维稳解决方案!

发掘汇报软件

使用亲民维稳全套解决方案邀请

亲稳发掘汇报系统

打造亲民维稳之格局,以便稳中求进,是每一个基层领导的光荣使命与重要责任!是为官一任,造福一方的不二途径!是守住已有成果的必要前提,是继续前进的必要根基!

变味的城市景观开发 “造景风”变“造景疯”?--亲稳网络舆情监测室
2012-09-10

  新华网上海9月10日电(记者许晓青、刘天)近来,一股近乎疯狂的“造景风”正在各地蔓延。从“人间天堂”苏州和杭州,到古都西安、古镇凤凰,一些新上马的城市景观开发项目频频遭网友“炮轰”。前有苏州在建地标建筑被调侃为“低腰秋裤”,后有杭州规划设计的奥体博览城部分建筑被戏称“比基尼大楼”。“雷人”的不仅是建筑外形,一些地方还不惜工本大兴土木,有的甚至违背当地生态规律大造水景,引来非议。 Xinhuanet Shanghai on September 10 (Reuters)(Reporter XuXiaoQing/Liu day)recently,A shares almost crazy"Landscape wind"Are spread all over.from"Heaven on earth"Suzhou and hangzhou,To the ancient capital of xian/Town phoenix,Some new mounting city landscape development project by netizens frequently"cannon".Before construction of suzhou landmarks was fun for"Low waist QiuKu",Hangzhou after the planning and design of the Olympic sports expo city part of the building to be picked"Bikini building"."shocking"Not only is the architectural appearance,Some places are spare no expense daxing civil,Some even against the local ecological law big made water scene,Drew criticism.

  面对舆论追问,开发商和地方主管部门纷纷出面辩解,但巨资已经砸下去,蓝图一天天变成现实,很多争议似乎依然很难“讨个说法”。

In the face of public opinion cross-examine,Developers and the local competent departments have to excuse,But a huge sum of money has hit down,Blueprint day by day into reality,A lot of controversy seems to be still difficult to"Make a statement".

  

城市造景频频“雷人” City landscape frequently"shocking"

  近来,一些城市的景观开发项目频频“雷人”。一是新建地标性建筑外观被指“俗不可耐”。苏州在建的高层建筑“东方之门”因形似裤子,被网友冠以“低腰秋裤”的“雷人”绰号;无独有偶,杭州奥体博览城体育馆与游泳馆项目俯瞰图也在网上疯转,一些联想丰富的网友直呼其为“比基尼大楼”。

recently,Some of the city's landscape development project again and again"shocking".One is the new landmark appearance is refers to"snobbism".Suzhou in the high-rise building"The eastern gate"Because like trousers,Be net friend with"Low waist QiuKu"of"shocking"nickname;similarly,Hangzhou Olympic sports expo city gymnasium and swimming pool project aerial view on the web crazy turn,Some association abundant net friend call it as"Bikini building".

  二是古城古镇新一轮保护性开发砸大钱。前不久,55亿元打造“烟雨凤凰”的计划令湘西古镇凤凰站在“风口浪尖”。尽管经营方辩称“非复制,也非重建”,而是建行政、居民、游客三大新区域,缓解每年成百上千万的游客压力,但“建新护古说”,在数十亿的投资规模面前,依然令人担忧。

Second is the ancient city of the ancient town of a new round of protective development hit a lot of money.Not long ago,5.5 billion yuan build"Misty rain phoenix"Plan to xiangxi town phoenix stood in"In the teeth of the storm".Although that business practice"Not copy,Nor reconstruction",But build administrative/residents/Tourists three new area,Ease every year millions of tourists pressure,but"New protecting ancient said",In front of the billions of investment scale,Still worrying.

  三是“逆生态”大造水景。古都西安前不久掀起“造湖运动”,要在城区和近郊修建28个人工湖泊,希望重现自汉代就有的“八水绕长安”的美景。这28个人工湖水面总面积约为30平方公里,是杭州西湖的5倍多,造价更是高达百亿元。与之相仿,北方一些常年降雨量偏少的城市,在打造新地标时也大打“水景牌”,不仅投入巨大,而且违背了当地水土生态规律。

The third is"Inverse ecological"Big made waterscape.Ancient capital xian recently lifted"Made lake movement",In urban and suburban built 28 artificial lakes,Hope is born again since the han dynasty is some"Eight water around the changan"beauty.This 28 artificial lake surface a total area of about 30 square kilometers,The west lake in hangzhou was five times more,Cost is as high as ten billion yuan.And similar to the,The north some perennial rainfall partial little city,In creating new landmark also big play"Waterscape brand",Not only into the huge,And against the law of soil and water ecology.

  

谁来管住“随便建”? Who will control"Literally built"?

  细心者发现,这些在建“雷人”地标建筑及开发规划有两大相似之处,一是或多或少与古城古镇的后续开发沾边;二是相当一部分为开发商、私营业主的设计和建设行为。

Careful hunter has found,The construction"shocking"Landmark building and development planning has two big similarities,One is more or less and the ancient city of the ancient town development during follow-up;The second part is quite for developers/Private owner's design and construction behavior.

  以“秋裤”状的“东方之门”为例,建筑位于苏州工业园区金鸡湖畔,尽管与苏州老城区尚有一定的地理距离,但舆论依然认为过于时尚现代的地标性建筑外观,与苏州当地整体的古朴文化风格很难匹配。

to"QiuKu"shaped"The eastern gate"For example,Building located in suzhou industrial park jinji lake,Although and suzhou old city there are certain geographical distance,But public opinion still think too fashionable modern landmark appearance,And the whole of of primitive simplicity of suzhou local cultural style is hard to match.

  据苏州工业园区管委会证实,“东方之门”项目系“私营企业的商业项目”,更是引发网友对开发商、私营业主“随便建”,地方主管部门“难插手”等现象的担忧。

According to the suzhou industrial park management committee confirmed,"The eastern gate"Project system"The private enterprise's business project",But also cause net friend to developers/Private owner"Literally built",The local competent departments"Difficult to intervene in"Wait for a phenomenon concerns.

  就此类“随便建”现象,记者求教同济大学教授、国家历史文化名城保护研究中心主任阮仪三。阮教授的答复是,无论是历史文化遗产保护,还是古城镇或新城镇的开发规划,首先必须是依法办事,地方主管部门根据地方法规条款和管理办法等,具有依法行政的权力。

the"Literally built"phenomenon,Reporter for advice tongji university professor/National historical and cultural city protection and research center director ruan yisan from.Nguyen professor answer is,Both historical and cultural heritage protection,Or ancient town or the new town development planning,First of all must be to follow the law,The local competent departments according to the local laws and regulations terms and management measures, etc,Has the power of administration according to law.

  阮教授指出,在城市规划中,无论项目与历史文化遗产或古城镇等地名沾边与否,拟开发项目的依法公示、重大公共设施项目规划交付地方人大审议等,都是卡住“随便建”现象的第一道防线,其次则是舆论监督,可以揭露那些潜在的违法违规现象,推进古城镇的保护和开发。

Nguyen professor noted that,In the city planning,Whether the project and historical and cultural heritage of ancient place names or town them or not,Quasi development project of the public in accordance with law/Major public infrastructure project planning delivery place National People's Congress deliberation, etc,Are stuck"Literally built"The phenomenon of the first line of defense,Second is the supervision of public opinion,Can reveal the potential illegal phenomenon,Promote the protection and exploitation of the ancient town.

  

“利”与“义”如何平衡? "the"and"righteousness"How to balance?

  针对“低腰秋裤”“烟雨凤凰”等近期焦点,阮仪三在接受记者采访时表示,要辩证看待各地古城古镇保护性开发过程中所遭遇的新问题。

According to"Low waist QiuKu""Misty rain phoenix"Recent focus, such as,Ruan yisan from when accepting a reporter to interview said,To dialectical view around the ancient city of the ancient town protective development encountered frequently in the process of new questions.

  他认为,对于那些与古城镇相关,甚至只是地理位置相近而“借壳”的造景项目,首先要避免“利”字当头,必需平衡好项目本身的公益性和商业性。

He thinks,For those with ancient town related,Even just the geographical position close but"Borrow shell"Landscape project of,First of all to avoid"the"Word pledge,Must balance the project itself and the public and commercial.

  “比如,湘西的"烟雨凤凰"项目,如果真是为了将部分凤凰古镇的接待和娱乐功能转移出去,稀释游客密度,这样的做法也未尝不可,是对凤凰古镇本身的一种保护。但名字沾边的新建功能区,就不能挂着"凤凰古镇"的名号,是旅游功能区,就应称为旅游功能区,不能建了"假古董",还拿"凤凰古镇"的名号打擦边球。”

"For example,Of xiangxi"Misty rain phoenix"project,If it is really to part of the order of the phoenix town reception and entertainment function transfer out,Dilution tourists density,This approach also have not cannot,Is the order of the phoenix town itself is a kind of protection.But name during new functional areas,Can't hang"The order of the phoenix town"name,Is the tourist area,Should be called tourism area,Can't built"Fake antiques",Still take"The order of the phoenix town"The name dozen edge ball."

  阮仪三认为,城市造景对开发商和地方政府而言固然有巨大的利益可言,但开发本身更要重“义”。他说,这里的“义”包含一是遵纪守法,二是尊重自然、历史规律,三是尊重老百姓的看法,这样的开发项目才能不唯利是图。

Ruan yisan from think,Urban landscape for developers and local governments concerned is a huge interest in,But development itself more heavy"righteousness".He said,here"righteousness"Contains a law is,2 it is respect for nature/Historical law,The third is to respect people view,Such a development project can not venality.

  比如,西安重现“八水绕长安”的设计方案,阮教授分析,目前陕西地区仍是缺水区域,蒸发量大于降水量,“人们一旦违背自然规律,必然会遭到大自然的报复。”

For example,Xian reproduction"Eight water around the changan"Design scheme,Nguyen professor analysis,In Shanxi Province at present is still water shortage area,Evaporation is greater than the amount of precipitation,"People once go against nature,Will was the nature of the revenge."

  他认为,网友热议的一些城市造景项目背后“各有是非曲直”,个别限于建筑外观的争议,也可能随着时间的推移,会产生不同的结论或新的共识,舆论也要有一定的包容度,“当年巴黎的埃菲尔铁塔、卢浮宫玻璃金字塔入口等都曾引发热议,但最终成为新的经典。”

He thinks,Netizen hot discussion of some of the urban landscape projects behind"Each have the rights and wrongs",Individual limited to architectural appearance of the dispute,May also with the passage of time,Will produce different conclusions or new consensus,Public opinion will have a certain degree of tolerance,"The Eiffel Tower in Paris/The Louvre glass pyramid entrance and so on all have cause of hot debate,But eventually become the new classical."

  “我们需要"火眼金睛"的舆论监督,保护历史文化遗产,也需要一个宽容的舆论氛围,有助于城市地标建筑及规划的创新。”他说。

"We need to"Sharp eyes"Supervision of public opinion,The protection of historical and cultural heritage,Also need a tolerant public opinion atmosphere,Help city landmarks and planning innovation."He said.

  作者:许晓青 刘天 (来源:新华网)

The author:XuXiaoQing liu day (source:xinhuanet)


亲稳链接:链接亲民维稳,践行稳中求进!