原标题：新华社三问华山捅人案:为何事件前后说法不一 Original title:The xinhua news agency three ask huashan tong one case: why have different views before and after the event
　　第一，从游客群殴到黄牛党倒票闹事，为何事件前后说法不一？第二，在没有对当事人、目击证人充分取证情况下，为何急于下结论？第三，华山景区管理到底存在哪些致命问题？ “游客被捅”折射当前大多数景区管理漏洞，仓促办案中瑕疵影响政府公信力，相关部门需尽快回应民众质疑。

The first,From the visitors ou to HuangNiuDang speculative reselling of tickets riots,Why before and after the event explanations?The second,None of the parties/The witness fully forensics cases,Why jump to conclusions?The third,Huashan scenic area management exists exactly what the deadly problem? "Tourists have been tong"Refraction current most scenic spot loopholes in management,Rush in handling the defects affect the credibility of our government,The relevant departments as soon as possible to respond to people questioned.