文学固然高雅得多，与社会之间相互影响的方式也复杂得多，但“有影响”总强过“没影响”，尤其是在“严肃文学”正在逐渐成为少数人垄断话语权的圈子游戏的今天，大众的肤浅消费，也许比精英们故作高深的阐释更加健康。

Literature is much more elegant,And social interaction between the way also is much more complicated,but"influential"Always better than"Did not affect the",Especially in"Serious literature"Are gradually becoming a few monopoly right circle game today,Popular superficial consumption,Perhaps more than elites pretend to be profound interpretation more healthy.

　　中国的知识分子比较难伺候，常常正反两面不高兴。国内作家没人获诺贝尔文学奖，他们急吼吼地等、盼、催了几十年，为评委会忽视中国乃至敌视中国而愤慨；好不容易有个获奖的，立马又有人高屋建瓴地抛出警世名言：切忌过度消费莫言，过度消费诺贝尔奖。

The intellectuals in China is difficult to serve,Both sides often not happy.Domestic writer nobody has won the Nobel Prize for literature,They hurry roar, etc/wish/Push for decades,For juries ignore China and even hostile to China and indignation;Very not easy to have a winning,Immediately and others about pop remarks:Avoid by all means is excessive consumption mo yan,Excessive consumption the Nobel Prize.

　　“过度消费”和早年间的“浮躁”一样，已经成了某些人的口头禅。在这儿也姑且较个真儿：“消费”一下莫言与诺贝尔奖，又有什么坏处呢？另外，什么样的“消费”才算“过度”？假如是印书卖书的话，恐怕算不上“过度消费”。众所周知，近当代文学的一大特点，就是建立在现代出版制度之上，把作品当作产品，通过工业化的方式贩卖给群众，这个模式天经地义。从狄更斯时代开始，作家就在计算着作品的销量和版税，诺贝尔奖成为促销的砝码，也是躲不过去的宿命。

"Excessive consumption"And folk"fickleness"as,Has become the pet phrase of some people.Here is a true son also tentatively:"consumption"The mo yan and the Nobel Prize,What's the harm?In addition,What kind of"consumption"is"excessive"?If be the book sells books words,I'm afraid not"Excessive consumption".As is known to all,One of the characteristics JinDangDai literature,Is the establishment in the modern publishing system above,The works as a product,Through the industrialization way to sell it to the masses,This mode god's truth.From dickens era began,The writer is in the calculation of the works of sales and royalties,The Nobel Prize become weight of promotion,And hide not the past fate.

　　不光是中国，几乎所有国家都存在着跟风的读者和精明的出版商，他们是构成文学“消费”的主要力量，也是中坚力量。当然，除去常规的买书与阅读，可能还有一些特殊的、衍生的“消费模式”，譬如修缮故居筹建纪念馆这种“给活人盖庙”的举动，比如把作家作品当成幌子开发旅游的行为，再比如不考虑意蕴内涵性描写多少先当国粹选进课本再说的计划。这些“消费”可能是中国独有的，也够得上“过度”的范畴。不过说句不尊重的话，米老鼠的原版电影现在还有几个人看？大家记住了一只年近花甲的大耗子，遍地开花的迪斯尼公园功不可没。文学固然高雅得多，与社会之间相互影响的方式也复杂得多，但有影响总强过没影响，尤其是在“严肃文学”正在逐渐成为少数人垄断话语权的圈子游戏的今天，大众的肤浅消费，也许比精英们故作高深的阐释更加健康。

Is not only China,Almost all countries there are follow suit of readers and shrewd publishers,They constitute the literature"consumption"'s main power,Backbone is.Of course,Remove the conventional to buy books and reading,There may be some special/derived"Consumption pattern",Such as the former residence of repair this memorial"To the living and the cover temple"move,Such as the writer works as a cover to develop tourist behavior,And such as do not consider how much connotation meaning of sex first when the quintessence of Chinese culture into the textbooks say plan.these"consumption"May be unique to China,Also enough for"excessive"category.But speak no respect for words,Mickey Mouse's original movie now have several people to see?We remember a NianJinHuaJia big mice,Blossom everywhere Disney park play an important role.Literature is much more elegant,And social interaction between the way also is much more complicated,But there are better than did not affect the total effect,Especially in"Serious literature"Are gradually becoming a few monopoly right circle game today,Popular superficial consumption,Perhaps more than elites pretend to be profound interpretation more healthy.

　　当然，这么说并不意味着诺贝尔文学奖真的应该像超女一样快销化、娱乐化，“中国好文学”也不可能变成“中国好声音”。假如文学是关乎灵魂的工作，那么中国人也和世界上的所有人一样，无权忘记灵魂的重要性。同样，我们也不能忘记诺贝尔文学奖的本原意义，真的把它当作文化快餐。只不过，从“消费”某位获奖作家转向理解文学、感悟文学，这样的质变恐怕也并非一个文学奖能够促成的——不管这个奖有多大个儿。中国人所需要的去浮躁化、去功利化的进步，也只能由这个社会通过自身的漫长努力才能实现。从这个意义上讲，将“消费诺贝尔奖”当作实现远景目标的一个手段，或许也有着独特的积极意义。

Of course,This is not to say that the Nobel Prize for literature really should be like super girls as fast pin change/More entertaining,"Chinese literature"Nor can become"China's good voice".If literature is for the soul of the work,So Chinese also and in the world all people,Has no right to forget the importance of soul.The same,We can't forget the Nobel Prize in literature primitive meaning,Really put it as a cultural fast food.just,from"consumption"A winning writers to understand literature/Feeling of literature,Such a qualitative change I'm afraid it is not a prize for literature can contribute to this award -- no matter how big.Chinese people need go blundering change/Go to the progress of the utilitarian,Also only by the society through their own efforts to achieve long.In this sense,will"Consumption the Nobel Prize"As a long-term goal of the realization of a method,Perhaps also has a unique positive meaning.

　　消费没有原罪，关键在于我们从消费中“买”到了什么，“用”了什么。中国的文化氛围，所缺的并不只是一个国际大奖，更是一种良性运转的“消费”模式。

Consumption not original sin,The key lies in us from the consumption"buy"What have,"with"what.China's cultural atmosphere,The missing is not just an international awards,Is a kind of benign operation"consumption"mode.

　　□穆风（北京 文学编辑）

- MuFeng(Beijing literature editor)