国庆长假期间，全国多处高速公路出现了拥堵现象，让此前颇受好评的免费通行政策也引发了一些争议。一部分专家认为，免费通行政策降低了居民出行成本，拉动了旅游业及相关消费，缓解了铁路、民航运力不足，带来了巨大的经济和社会效益。而另一部分专家则认为，长假免费通行政策是造成出行暴增、高速路拥堵的罪魁祸首，这其中，尤以经济学家李稻葵“跳”得最凶。

National Day long vacation period,The national highway traffic congestion phenomenon appeared,Let the previous quite well received toll free policy also led to some dispute.Part of the experts say,Toll free policy to reduce the residents travel cost,Pull the tourism and related consumption,Easing railway/Insufficiency of civil aviation,Brought huge economic and social benefits.And the other part of the experts think,Long vacation toll free policy is a travel jumps/Highway traffic congestion culprit,the,Especially in the economists LiDaoKui"jump"loudest.

　　李稻葵认为，高速公路既不是公共品，也不是生活必需品，所以应该谁受益谁交钱，而且这些受益人都是中高收入的人，有车的人，没有理由进行免费。对于高速公路免费政策影响相关上市公司业绩的问题，李稻葵表示，不能凭一纸行政命令，就干预上市公司，长假高速免费是“世界上最愚蠢政策”。不仅如此，李稻葵还在微博中建议，节假日期间应提高高速公路通行价格，或可涨价50%。

LiDaoKui think,Highway is neither public goods,Is not life necessities,So who should benefit who make money,And the beneficiary beneficiary is the high income,Car people,There is no reason for free.For highway free policy influence performance of listed companies related to the problem,LiDaoKui said,Not by a paper executive orders,Will interfere with the listed company,Long vacation high speed is free"In the world the most stupid policy".Not only that,LiDaoKui also in micro bo suggest,Holidays should improve highway going price,Or can increase our price by 50%.

　　欣赏这种直抒胸臆的快意表达，但对其观点却无法认同。首先指出李先生的几个常识性的错误。其一，高速公路即使不算是严格意义上的公共品，但至少也是准公共品，这不仅是一种国际惯例，更因为高速公路的投资主体是各级政府，这一点不能因为当下许多高速公路被企业承包经营和上市而改变。其二，因为高速公路的受益者是中高收入阶层，就没有理由免费了吗？这是典型的逻辑错误，受益者的身份与高速公路免费没有任何关系。其三，节假日期间高速公路通行价格上涨50%，按这样的思路，那么非假期高速路是否该下调通行价格？

Appreciate this express their pleased expression,But for its views but not identity.It firstly points out that Mr. Li's several common-sense error.one,Highway even if not a strict sense of public goods,But at least is quasi public goods,This is not only a kind of international practice,But because of the highway investment subject is the governments at all levels,This point cannot because then many highway be enterprise contract management and listed and change.The second,Because the highway beneficiary is the high income class,There is no reason for free?This is typical of logic error,The identity of the beneficiaries and highway free without any relationship.thirdly,Holidays highway going price rose 50%,According to such thinking,So the holiday highway whether or not the going price cut?

　　相比较而言，李先生稍稍有点技术含量的观点是，行政命令不得干预上市公司。在市场经济环境下，行政的归行政，企业的归企业，一般情况下，行政不得干预企业正常的经营活动。然而，这并不意味着政府不能有任何作为，企业可以任意而为，否则，即走向了另一个极端，用经济学的术语说，就是“市场原教旨主义”，即市场可以自动调节到正常状态，不需政府以任何方式进行干预。但高速公路并不是一个开放的竞争性的市场，而是一个相对封闭的垄断市场，这就意味着消费者没有议价和用脚投票的权利，这样的市场不太可能依靠自动调节趋向于利益平衡，需要政府的有形之手加以适当控制。

compared,Mr. Li slightly technology content point of view is,Executive orders shall not interfere with the listed company.In a market economy environment,Administrative to administrative,The enterprise to enterprise,generally,Administrative shall not interfere with the enterprise normal business activities.however,This does not mean that the government can't have any as,Enterprise can be arbitrary,otherwise,That is to the other extreme,With economic term said,is"Market fundamentalism",The market can automatically adjust to the normal state,Does not need to government intervention in any way.But highway and is not an open competitive market,But a relatively closed monopoly market,This means that the consumer is not bargaining and the right to vote with their feet,This market is unlikely to rely on automatic adjustment tendency balance of interests,Need the government's visible hand the proper control.

　　高速公路收费，是在政府财力不足的情况下的一种无奈之举，国家政策对高速收费的期限有着明确的规定。但现实是，一些高速公路通过“变脸”的方式超期收费，而在2009年，路桥收费业超越房地产业和金融业居三大暴利行业之首。世行专家曾表示，中国是高速公路收费标准最高的国家之一，而中国的通行费可承受性是全世界最低的几个国家之一。种种迹象都表明，政府对高速公路的管控还不够多。此次国庆长假免费，是还利于民，不仅理所当然，而且不可能对高速上市公司造成实质性的影响。就这样还被某些专家说成是“世界上最愚蠢政策”，恐怕连上市公司都会觉得不好意思。李先生这个利益代言人实在称不上合格。

Highway charges,The government is lack of financial resources under the condition of a kind of trepidation,National policy on high speed charge period has a clear rules.But the reality is,Some highway through the"Suddenly turn hostile"The way of charge,In 2009,Luqiao charges industry beyond the real estate and financial circles in three big profits of industry.The world bank experts have said,China is highway charges the highest standards of one of the country,While China's toll affordability is the lowest in the world one of several countries.There is every indication of a,Government to highway control is not enough.The National Day long vacation free,Is also conducive to people,Not only granted,And not likely to high speed caused substantial impact on listed companies.It was some experts said to be"In the world the most stupid policy",I'm afraid even listed companies will feel embarrassed.Mr. Li the lobby really do not say to go up qualified.

　　国庆长假高速路免费确实带来了一些问题，但问题的实质不在于免费本身。正如经济学者马光远所说，相关政策对于免费以后可能出现的问题缺乏应对，仅仅规定要免费，但是具体怎么免费，出现了拥堵问题紧急预案是什么，没有操作上的细化。更重要的原因可能是，民众对高速公路免费还不太习惯，若这样的免费午餐多一些，大家就不会蜂拥而至了。

National Day long vacation expressway free really brought some problems,But the essence of the problem is not free itself.As the economist MaGuangYuan said,Relevant policy for free may appear later to deal with the problem of lack of,Only stipulated to be free,But the specific how free,Appeared congestion problem emergency plan is what,No operational refining.The more important reason may be,The populace to the highway free also not too habit,If such a free lunch some more,They are not the throng.