女孩状告世界之窗索赔百万 Girl claims filed a lawsuit against the Windows of the world one million

　　照片被世界之窗使用四年 Photo is used by the Windows of the world for four years

　　现年13岁的女孩小悦从2008年5月开始，她身穿和服的照片就在世界之窗的日本园中展示了4年。去年，小悦状告世界之窗侵犯肖像权，索赔100万元。法院一审判世界之窗赔其2000元。双方均不服上诉，昨日该案在深圳中院二审。

Small yue, 13-year-old girl since May 2008,Wearing a kimono pictures on the window of the world of the Japanese garden shows the four years.Last year,,Small yue infringement of image rights against the Windows of the world,The claim 1 million yuan.A trial court window of the world to compensate them 2000 yuan.Neither party refuses to accept the appeal,Yesterday the case in shenzhen, then a second trial.

　　小悦诉称，父亲刘某原为深圳世界之窗有限公司的员工。2008年5月，小悦受邀前往日本园试穿和服，摄影师对其拍照，但未告知照片用途。2012年3月，刘某无意中知道照片被用于日本园的文化展示和宣传广告长达4年之久。小悦认为，世界之窗侵犯了自己的肖像权，要求其赔礼道歉，并索赔100万元。

Small yue complained,Father LiuMou belonged to shenzhen window of the world co., LTD employees.In May 2008,Small yue garden try kimono invited to Japan,The photographer taking pictures on it,But did not inform photo purposes.In March 2012,LiuMou inadvertently know photos were used in the Japanese garden culture display and advertising for 4 years.Small yue think,Window of the world violated its rights,Asked her to apologize,And claims 1 million yuan.

　　世界之窗方面则称，当时日本园选了2个员工的孩子参加拍摄，都属于帮忙性质。

The window of the world has said,At that time the Japanese garden chose two employees' children to participate in shooting,Belong to help nature.

　　法院一审认为，世界之窗没有充分的证据证明邀请小悦试穿和服和拍照用于宣传系无偿性质，因此存在侵权行为。但由于小悦和其父亲刘某未详细询问是否存在报酬，对世界之窗侵权事实的发生存在重大过错，因此判决世界之窗赔偿2000元。

The court of first instance that,Window of the world is not enough evidence to prove invite small yue try kimono and photo for publicity is property free of charge,So there is infringement.But due to small yue and his father LiuMou did not ask for details of whether there is a reward,Infringing facts to the Windows of the world there is serious fault,Compensation of 2000 yuan. Therefore ruling the Windows of the world.

　　双方都不服一审判决，向深圳中院提起上诉。昨天开庭时，世界之窗一方表示，虽然使用照片未付酬，但却经过了刘某的默许同意，因此不存在侵权。

Defy the first-instance judgment on both sides,To appeal to the intermediary court in shenzhen.When open a court session yesterday,The window of the world said,Although using photos haven't been paid,But after LiuMou tacit consent,So there is no infringement.

　　而刘某则称，当时去帮忙，只是去试穿和服，而不是同意将照片用于宣传，因此，不存在询问报酬的事，自己不存在重大过错。

While LiuMouZe said,At the time to help,Just to try it on kimono,Not agree to use photos for propaganda,so,There is no ask compensation,They don't exist serious fault.

　　昨天，法官组织了调解，刘某同意调解，而世界之窗一方不同意，其称园内很多照片都是邀请员工家属及子女帮忙无偿拍摄的，如果调解就代表他们有错，对其他员工也不好交代。目前，该案还在进一步审理中。(记者王纳)

yesterday,Judge the mediation organization,LiuMou agree to mediation,But one don't agree with a window of the world,According to the park a lot of pictures are invited staff help for families and children,If the mediation is wrong they are,For other employees also is bad.At present,The case in the further trial.(The reporter Wang Na)