这份报告中的家庭住房包括城市和农村两大类,其中42.2%的家庭现住房为平房,主要是在广大农村地区。如果研究中国住房问题把农村包括进来,将会以偏概全、避重就轻,回避和掩盖许多问题。详细>>>

The report of the urban and rural family housing include two categories,42.2% of the family now housing for bungalow,Mainly in the rural area。If the study of China's housing problems include rural,Will be biased、Cop a,Avoidance and cover up many problems。detailed>>>

　　昆明市长张祖林曾公开表示，“有权有钱部门的人员有四五套房子很普遍，多得住不完，弱势群体没房住，政府不盖公租房，中低收入者就住不起房子。”昆明市长的一番大实话道出了住房现状，亦折射出社会财富分配机制不公的问题。而如今房子拥有量的多寡程度，也成为衡量居民财富的一个重要指标，“被平均”的住房面积是财富分配失衡的表象，背后则是贫富差距、官民割裂、保障房供应不足等社会问题。详细>>>

The mayor of kunming ZhangZuLin has publicly said，“Have the right to rich department personnel have four or five a house is very common，Much live not over，Vulnerable groups no room to live，The government does not cover and renting a house，Low-income people lived not house。”Kunming long a truth revealed the housing situation，Also reflects the social wealth distribution mechanism of injustice problem。And now the amount of house ownership degree，Also be the measure of the wealth of the residents is an important index，“Be average”Housing area is the distribution of wealth of the imbalance of representation，Behind it is the gap between rich and poor、Officer people split、Security room in short supply and other social problems。detailed>>>

切莫因“人均住房36平方米”懈怠调控 Never for“The per capita housing 36 square meters”Loafing regulation

　　粗犷的数字无法描述真实可感的社会，纸堆里的调研换不来民众的居住幸福感。“人均住房面积36平方米”恐怕有点“水分”。民众真实感受到的是：房价高企、住房面积狭小、要为房贷而辛苦奔走……北大校长助理李强表示，将持续开展调查并发布数据，为政府决策提供依据。然而值得拷问的是，若以这个“人均住房面积36平方米”为依据，将会引出什么样的决策呢？详细>>>

Straightforward digital could not describe the grandeur real society，Paper pile survey not for people living happiness。“The per capita housing area of 36 square meters”I'm afraid a little“moisture”。People feel is real：High house prices、Housing area is narrow、For mortgage and run hard...Pku President assistant li qiang said，Will continue to carry out research and publish data，To provide a basis for government decision-making。Yet it is torture，If the“The per capita housing area of 36 square meters”Based on the，Order will be what kind of decision？detailed>>>

　　住房问题之所以被各研究机构作为研究目标，是因为该问题是当下民众最关心的问题之一。反映时下中国住房问题，平均数最不能说明问题，但是有些研究机构偏偏要选择这一概念，这是有意混淆视听，还是在回避问题？作为研究机构必须明白，研究问题必须有研究者的立场，不能为了粉饰太平，也不能为了吸引眼球，必须解决实际问题。详细>>>

Housing problem are the research institutions as the research target，Because this problem is now one of the top concerns of the public。Reflect the nowadays China's housing problem，The average does not suggest that problem，But some research institutions are to choose this concept，This is intended to mislead the people，Or in avoidance problem？As a research institutions must understand，To study the problem must have the researchers position，Not to put a good face，Also cannot in order to attract eyeball，Must solve practical problems。detailed>>>

　　时下，国内房价仍然居高不下，处于调控的紧要关口，是不是因为一个“人均住房36平方米”的数据，就没有加大调控力度的必要了？同时，党的十七大明确提出，努力使全体人民住有所居，按照这一“数据”，社会公众早就“住有所居”了，提这个宏观目标还有什么意义？三年内建设3600万元保障性住房的目标，设立还有什么价值？

nowadays，Domestic house prices are still high，In the regulation and control of critical gates，Is it because a“The per capita housing 36 square meters”data，There is no increase control power of necessity？At the same time，The party congress clearly put forward，Try to make all the people live in somewhat，According to the“data”，Social public early“Live in somewhat”the，Carry this macro goal still have what meaning？Three years to build 36 million yuan indemnificatory housing target，What is the value set up？

　　令人揪心的是，上述“平均数据”已经严重与社会现实脱节！不仅不会对决策者起到真正的提醒和借鉴作用，反而会误导公众，影响楼市的宏观调控。详细>>>

The disturbing is，The above“Average data”Has seriously disrupted and social reality！Not only will not to decision makers have real remind and reference，It will mislead the public，Affect the property market macro-control。detailed>>>