“磨牙棒”饼干噎死6个月大的宝宝？ “Grind one's teeth bar”Biscuit choke dead six months big baby？

　　

家属索赔65万余元，生产商、经销商和婴幼儿用品店都说自己没责任 Family members of more than 650000 yuan claim，producers、The dealer and the baby store all says he has no responsibility

　　婴儿长到4至10个月，乳牙萌发，总想咬硬的东西，这时，一些家长会买来牙胶或“磨牙棒”之类的辅助工具，帮孩子锻炼咀嚼能力。

Baby long to 4 to 10 months，Deciduous teeth germination，Always want to bite the hard stuff，At this time，Some parents buy tooth gum or“Grind one's teeth bar”The auxiliary tool and so on，Help my child to exercise chewing ability。

　　然而，在温州务工的徐某夫妇，怎么也没想到，自己6个月大的儿子，吃了某品牌的“磨牙棒”饼干后，还没几分钟，就被噎住了，最终孩子因抢救无效死亡。

however，In wenzhou of the workers XuMou couple，I never thought，His six months old son，Eat a certain brand“Grind one's teeth bar”Biscuit after，Haven't a few minutes，Is choke up the，Finally the child for rescue invalid death。

　　徐某夫妇无法接受突如其来的丧子之痛，随后一纸诉状，将该品牌“磨牙棒”的生产商、经销商和婴幼儿用品店一起告上法庭，索赔65.7万元。

XuMou couple can't accept sudden childless pain，Then a paper petition，Will this brand“Grind one's teeth bar”producers、Dealers and baby shop together to court，Claim 657000 yuan。

　　

6个月大的男婴吃“磨牙棒”饼干窒息身亡？ The six month old baby boy to eat“Grind one's teeth bar”Biscuit suffocation death？

　　去年12月，徐某的妻子，在湖北老家生下了儿子小豪(化名)，今年2月接到温州生活。

Last December，XuMou wife，In hubei home gave birth to son little house(alias)，February this year from wenzhou life。

　　6月21日，徐某夫妇到市区某婴幼儿用品店买奶粉，营业员推荐了一种婴幼儿“磨牙棒”饼干，我们就买了一盒。

On June 21,，XuMou couples go downtown a baby shop to buy milk powder，The shop assistant recommend a baby“Grind one's teeth bar”cookies，We bought a box。

　　6月23日中午，徐某的妻子拿了一根“磨牙棒”给小豪吃。“没几分钟，儿子就被‘磨牙棒’噎住了。”

June 23 noon，XuMou wife took a root“Grind one's teeth bar”To eat small house。“A few minutes，Son was‘Grind one's teeth bar’Choke up the。”

　　徐某夫妇吓坏了，立即送儿子去医院，可惜小豪经抢救无效，不幸身亡。

XuMou couple frightened，Sending her son to the hospital immediately，But the little house after the rescue invalid，died。

　　徐某夫妇认为，这种“磨牙棒”本身存在产品质量问题：“磨牙棒”属于磨牙食品，不应当经婴儿口水浸泡就断裂，最终噎住了孩子，对此生产商有责任。

XuMou couples think that，this“Grind one's teeth bar”Itself exists product quality problem：“Grind one's teeth bar”Belong to grind one's teeth food，Should not the baby saliva soak is fracture，Final choke up the child，This producers have responsibility。

　　另外，经销商(也是外包装生产商)没有在产品外包装上，标明这种特殊膳食用品的食用方法等；婴幼儿用品店在销售时，没有告知正确的食用方法，销售质量及外包装不符合国家强制性规定的食品，也都应对小豪的死承担赔偿责任。

In addition，dealers(Is also the outer packing manufacturers)Not in the product outside wrapping，Shows the special dietary supplies edible method, etc；Baby shop in sales，No told the correct way to eat，Sales quality and outer packing not accord with national mandatory provisions of food，Also to the death of the little house shall bear the liability for compensation。

　　庭审中，小豪的死，与“磨牙棒”饼干是否有关系，成了双方争论的第一个焦点。

hearing，The death of the little house，and“Grind one's teeth bar”Cookies if there is a relationship，The debate became the first focus。

　　徐某夫妇拿出医院的病历，证明诊断结果为“异物吸入窒息”。

XuMou couple out of the hospital medical records，Proof for the diagnosis“Foreign body suction asphyxia”。

　　而3名被告则辩称，医院出具的病历，只显示“因异物吸入窒息”，这个“异物”并不能证明就是“磨牙棒”(尚未进行尸检)，况且小豪是在窒息之后20分钟才被送到医院的，这说明是家属原因导致死亡结果发生。

And three of the defendants is argued，Issued by the hospital medical records，Display only“For foreign body suction asphyxia”，this“Foreign body”Doesn't prove that is“Grind one's teeth bar”(Has not carried out an autopsy)，Besides small house is in after asphyxia 20 minutes to be sent to the hospital，This shows that is family causes death results。

　　双方争辩不下，最终一致同意，由法院指定鉴定机构，对小豪进行死因鉴定。

Both sides can argue，Finally agreed to，The court designated appraisal institutions，The little house on the cause of death appraisal。

　　

生产商、经销商和婴幼儿用品店都说婴儿的死与己无关 producers、The dealer and the baby store all say the baby's death has nothing to do with himself

　　至于产品是否存在缺陷，生厂商认为，他们的“磨牙棒”，生产和销售都是符合国家的标准。另外，“磨牙棒”是饼干配方，只是比普通饼干硬一点，不算特殊膳食。

As for whether the product defects，Manufacturers think，their“Grind one's teeth bar”，Production and sale are accord with national standard。In addition，“Grind one's teeth bar”Is biscuit formula，Just a bit better than ordinary cookies，Not special dietary。

　　经销商提出，如果家长喂养不当，任何食品都有可能造成食用危险。

Dealer puts forward，If parents improper feeding，Any food may cause edible risk。

　　他们要求小豪的母亲，还原当时的场景。

They asked for little Howe's mother，Reduction of the scene at that time。

　　小豪的母亲做了一个左手抱孩子，右手喂食“磨牙棒”的动作。“我当时就让儿子坐在我腿上，我就喂他，没过一会儿，他就噎住了……”她说。

Small house mother made a left hand holding the baby，Right hand feeding“Grind one's teeth bar”action。“I was let son to sit on my lap，I will feed his，Not long after，He choke up......”She said。

　　这时，“磨牙棒”的生厂商又质疑，婴儿的母亲当时可能就没有抱住婴儿，让婴儿自己躺着食用磨牙棒，造成这个结果。

At this time，“Grind one's teeth bar”The manufacturers and questioned，The baby's mother was there might be no hold the baby，Let the baby himself lying with edible grind one's teeth bar，Cause the result。

　　对于这样的辩解，徐某夫妇显得非常气愤。

For such excuse，XuMou couples appear very angry。

　　至于“磨牙棒”的产品包装，以及婴幼儿用品店销售时，有没有尽到说明义务，双方也是各持己见。

As for“Grind one's teeth bar”Product packaging，And baby shop sales，Have done demonstrative obligation，Both sides also were at sixes and sevens。

　　徐某一方认为，经销商没有在产品外包装上标明食用方法及注意事项等；而婴幼儿用品店在销售时，也没有尽到相应的告知义务。

XuMou party think，The distributor shall have no in product outer packing marked on the edible method and the matters needing attention, etc；And baby shop in sales，Nor do the corresponding tell obligation。

　　经销商拿出一盒新的“磨牙棒”饼干，指着饼干盒底部说，“这里已经很明确标明了注意事项，磨牙饼干适宜4-10个月大的婴儿使用，我们没有任何过错。”

The dealer took out a box of new“Grind one's teeth bar”cookies，Pointing to biscuit at the end department said，“Here has a clear mark the matters needing attention，Molar biscurt suitable for 4 to 10 months old babies use，We don't have any fault。”

　　婴幼儿用品店则拿出了徐某夫妇当天到店里购买“磨牙棒”时的监控录像，称徐某拿着“磨牙棒”饼干，看了大约半分钟，足以推断他看到了食用方法和注意事项。

Baby shop is took out XuMou couple day to the store to buy“Grind one's teeth bar”When the video monitoring，Says XuMou take“Grind one's teeth bar”cookies，See about half a minute，Enough to infer that he saw the edible method and the matters needing attention。

　　不过，监控录像只有画面并无声音，对于营业员是否已向徐某夫妇告知注意事项，婴幼儿用品店无法提供证据。

but，Surveillance video picture only and without voice，For the shop assistant is to XuMou couple told the matters needing attention，Baby shop could not provide evidence。

　　庭审结束后，法官征求了双方意见，都有调解意向，法庭决定近期组织双方调解。(通讯员 鹿轩 驻温州记者 解亮)

After the trial，The judge ask for the both sides，All have intention to mediation，The court decided to recent organization both sides mediation。(LuXuan correspondent in wenzhou XieLiang reporters)