美国当地时间5日下午，记者收到美国塔夫茨大学公共关系部副主任珍妮弗·克里兹发来的声明，表示塔夫茨大学正在对2008年在中国开展的研究所遵循的协议进行全面审查，进一步信息将在审查完成后提供。这是塔夫茨大学方面第二次就此事件发表声明。

The United States in the afternoon local time, 5,,Reporter received the United States tufts public relations, deputy director of the Jennifer kerry from this statement,Said tufts was carried out in China in 2008 the institute follow protocol comprehensive review,Further information will be provided after completion of examination.This is tufts second statement on the event.

　　声明说，塔夫茨大学对最近有关2008年在中国所做研究的质疑深为关切。“我们一直将人的健康置于最高位置，并采取一切措施确保人体研究对象的安全。我们一直并且将继续在研究中坚持最高伦理标准。”

Statement said,Tufts of recent relevant in China in 2008 questions do deeply concern."We have been men's health at the highest position,And take all measures to ensure that the human body the research object of safety.We have been and will continue to insist on the highest in the study ethical standard."

　　声明说，塔夫茨大学是世界上领先的研究型大学之一，在许多国家开展研究。塔夫茨大学尊重研究者在其中开展工作或者有合作项目的所有国家的法律、法规和文化，中国也不例外。

Statement said,Tufts is one of the world's leading research universities,In many countries research.Tufts respect in which researchers work or a cooperation project all state laws/Regulations and culture,China is no exception.

　　声明说，2008年在中国开展的试验的目的是，在此前美国进行的研究的基础上，了解“黄金大米”作为一种维生素A来源的可行性。

Statement said,In China in 2008 to the purpose of the experiment is,Before the United States on the basis of the research,understand"Golden rice"As A source of vitamin A feasibility.

　　声明说：“鉴于我们正在对这项研究中遵守的协议进行全面审查，以确保最严格的标准得到遵守，因此，在此时针对此事做进一步的猜测是不恰当的。我们将在完成审查后提供进一步的信息。”

Statement said:"In view of our is in this study abide by the agreement on comprehensive review,To ensure the compliance with the most stringent standards,therefore,At this time the matter for further speculation is not appropriate.We will complete the examination in after provide further information."

　　截至记者发稿时，塔夫茨大学研究员汤光文本人仍未回复记者。

At press time,Tufts researchers ShangGuang text people still did not reply reporter.

新闻回放 News playback

　　9月5日，本报“求证”栏目刊登报道《“黄金大米试验”疑云调查》。调查发现，美国刊发的一篇“黄金大米试验”论文内容与论文中方作者的陈述以及“求证”栏目记者在湖南实地调查情况存在矛盾之处。针对调查中存在的诸多疑问，本报驻美国记者采访该论文第一作者汤光文所在机构——美国塔夫茨大学，校方表示将调查了解相关情况。

On September 5,,the"verification"Column published reports["Golden rice test"The survey].Survey found,The United States hae a"Golden rice test"The paper content and paper China the author's statement and"verification"Column reporter in hunan field investigation situation exists discrepancies.In view of the investigation of the existing in many questions,Our newspaper reporter to interview in the United States, this paper first the author ShangGuangWen institution -- the United States tufts,The school said it will investigating related cases.

　　9月6日，本报“求证”栏目刊登报道《相关部门回应“黄金大米试验”疑云》。湖南省农业厅表示，湖南从未批准转基因大米试验。论文第三作者所在机构——中国疾控中心声明表示，该机构未组织参与美国有关“黄金大米人体试验”。（记者吴成良）

On September 6,,the"verification"Column published reports[Related departments response"Golden rice test"the].Hunan provincial bureau of animal husbandry said,Hunan never approved genetically modified rice test.The paper third author institution -- China CDC statement said,The agency organizations to participate in the United States is not relevant"Golden rice human trials".(Reporter WuChengLiang)