认为超市销售苦丁茶存在欺诈，刘先生诉北京某超市要求双倍赔偿。记者昨天获悉，经市二中院调解，双方达成协议，超市同意赔偿刘先生货款及损失共计2.1万元，同时刘先生需返还所购茶叶。

Think the supermarket sales bitter tea in fraud,Mr. Liu appeals to a supermarket in Beijing to double compensation.The reporter learns yesterday,The lu guoqiang mediation,Both sides reach an agreement,Supermarket agree to compensate liu payment and losses totaling 21000 yuan,At the same time Mr Liu to return purchased tea.

　　去年1月4日，刘先生在被告超市购买了8盒金碧春小叶苦丁茶极品，价款共计12528元。刘先生诉至一审法院称，超市销售人员说盒盖内介绍了苦丁茶有许多保健功能和治疗预防疾病的功效，但他回去饮用后感觉有点头晕，经查询得知苦丁茶只是一种普通食品，根本不具有产品宣传的保健和治疗等功效。此外，包装上标注“极品”也是广告法中禁用的绝对化用语。原告起诉要求超市双倍赔偿。超市答辩称，涉案商品虽有功效描述，但并未作为产品标识标签使用，故不同意双倍赔偿的诉讼请求。一审法院判决超市返还货款并赔偿损失，刘先生返还所购茶叶。超市上诉后，双方达成调解协议。(记者 颜斐)

Last year on January 4,,Mr Liu in the defendant supermarket bought eight box resplendent spring lobular bitter tea,The price $12528.Mr. Liu appeal the court said,Supermarket sales staff said that the lid is introduced in bitter tea has a lot of health care function and treatment effect of how to prevent disease,But he went back to drinking after feeling a little dizzy,The inquires that bitter tea is a kind of common food,Don't have the product publicity of health care and treatment, etc.In addition,Mark on the packing"gourmet"Also is in the advertisement law banned the principle.The plaintiff sued for supermarket double compensation.Supermarket defense says,Involving commodities although have effect,But not as a product identification tags,So don't agree with double compensation claims.The court judgment supermarket return the purchase price and compensate for the losses,Mr. Liu return purchased tea.After the supermarket appeal,Both parties reach a mediation agreement.(The reporter YanFei)