信息时报讯 （记者 魏徽徽 实习生 李昕通讯员 周征远） 广州实行限购房产政策后，两名买家签了合同后过户不了，拒付中介费被告上法庭。一审法院判决促成合同即要给中介费，而广州市中院则对两案进行了改判，认为根据购房数量不同等情节，是否应当支付中介费、支付多少应区别对待。

Information times dispatch （Reporter WeiHuiHui interns li xin correspondent ZhouZheng far） Guangzhou 限购 property after the policy，Two buyers signed the contract after the transfer，Refuse to pay in court accused of intermediary fee。I. the first-instance court ruling that contributed to the contract to give commission，And then the two case of guangzhou was adjudged，According to different circumstances purchase quantity，Whether they should pay commission、How much should pay discrimination。

　　案例1 二套被限 中介讨费未成功

Case 1 of two sets of be limit for intermediary fee without success

　　来自广宁县的梁先生并无广州市本地户籍，2011年1月13日，他通过广州市汇河房地产公司（下称汇河公司）签订了房屋买卖合同。其后，梁先生因已购买房产而无法完成过户手续，并以此为由拒绝向汇河公司支付中介代理费。汇河公司于是将梁某诉至海珠区法院。

Guangning county from the Mr. Liang and guangzhou this locality census register without，On January 13, 2011，He through the guangzhou collect river real estate company（The company said the remit）Signed the sale and purchase contract。after，Mr. Liang for already buying property and can not complete transfer procedures，And denied to collect river company pay intermediary agency fees。The company will then send LiangMou hai court appeal。

　　海珠区法院一审认为，汇河公司作为经纪方，为梁先生提供了订立合同的媒介服务，促成买卖双方签订合同，已履行居间人的义务，梁先生因此应支付中介代理费。梁某不服上诉到广州市中院。

Hai court first thought，The company as a broker square remit，For Mr. Liang provides enter into a contract of media services，Buying and selling to signing the contract，Already perform the obligation of the broker，Mr. Liang therefore shall pay fees intermediary。LiangMou refuses to appeal to the guangzhou then。

　　广州市中院则认为，梁先生并无本市户籍，汇河公司在广州限购二套房之前已促成梁先生成功新购一套广州市商品住房，其后限购政策出台，梁先生再购买房屋，无法办理房地产登记手续是必然的。而汇河公司并无证据证明其有将本市相关房屋限购政策告知梁先生，故梁先生称汇河公司故意隐瞒订立合同重要事项的理由成立。

Guangzhou is considered then，Mr. Liang and without the city census register，Collect river in guangzhou 限购 two suites company before Mr. Liang success has to buy a set of guangzhou new commodity housing，Behind 限购 policies，Mr. Liang to buy a house，Can't deal with the real estate registration is inevitable。And there is no evidence the company remit to prove its related this city will 限购 policy told Mr. Liang houses，So Mr. Liang said the company remit to enter into a contract to disclose any important matters of the reason was set up。

　　据此，二审判决汇河公司不能请求梁先生支付中介代理费。

accordingly，In the course of the river company can't request judgment which Mr. Liang pay intermediary agency fees。

　　案例2 第四套房产无法过户 买家仍需支付中介费

Case 2 the fourth set of house property can't transfer ownership still need to pay the buyer commission

　　记者获悉，海珠法院有另外一宗同样因限购政策引发的中介代理费纠纷案件，但终审判决却截然不同。

The reporter learns，One other cases of haizhu court for 限购 caused by the same policy intermediary fee dispute cases，But a final decision was very different。

　　2011年3月16日，梁某娴通过广州市德启房地产公司（下称德启公司）购买海珠区滨江东路一套价值850万元的豪宅，因梁某娴已有三处房产而无法完成过户手续。梁小姐认为，德启公司在没有告知其相关规定的情况下恶意促成买卖双方签订买卖合同，导致买卖合同因相关政策无法履行，于是拒绝支付中介费。德启公司将梁某娴告上法庭。

March 16, 2011，LiangMou xian through the guangzhou tak rev. Real estate company（DE rev. The company said）Buy a riverside hai road 8.5 million yuan worth of a person of extraordinary powers curtilage，For LiangMou xian for three homes, and can not complete transfer procedures。LiangXiaoJie think，DE rev. The company didn't inform the relevant provisions in the case to both parties sign malicious and purchase contract，Lead to business contract for relevant policy to be unable to fulfill，Then refused to pay commission。The company will LiangMou DE and the xian to court。

　　海珠区法院认为，梁小姐所称的限购政策为相关部门公开发布的规范性文件，并非德启公司隐瞒政策导致合同无法履行。而德启公司已实际促成双方签订合同，故梁小姐应按约定履行支付中介服务费的义务。梁小姐不服提出上诉。

The court said that hai，LiangXiaoJie said 限购 policy for related department published normative documents，Not DE rev. Company to hide policy contract can not be carried out。And the company has contributed to the actual DE and signing the contract，So LiangXiaoJie agreement should press to perform the obligation of pay intermediary service。LiangXiaoJie refuses to appeal。

　　广州市中院则指出，德启公司的中介服务存在重大瑕疵，既无法证明其已向梁某娴告知并要求在合同中执行限购政策，也没有对梁某娴的购房资格情况进行调查核实。但是，梁小姐在本市已经拥有三套住房，显然属于限购对象，然而梁小姐仍然继续在本市购买住房，有炒房嫌疑，也存在一定的过错，应承担相应的后果。

Guangzhou then has said，Germany and the intermediary service company has a major flaws，Neither to prove its already to LiangMou xian inform and requirements in the contract 限购 policy execution，And not for LiangMou xian purchase of the qualification to carry out investigation to verify the situation。but，LiangXiaoJie already has three sets in this city housing，Is clearly 限购 object，However LiangXiaoJie still continue to buy in this city housing，ChaoFang have suspected，There are also some fault，Shall bear the corresponding consequences。

　　鉴于梁小姐与德启公司双方均有过错，法院酌情减少梁某娴支付中介服务费的数额，双方合同约定中介费8万元，法院判决只需支付3万元。

In view of LiangXiaoJie DE rev. Company and both sides are fault，The court to reduce LiangMou xian discretion to pay the amount of the intermediary service，Both sides contract intermediary costs 80000 yuan，Court decisions just to pay 30000 yuan。

　　说法

statement

　　中介均未尽告知义务为何判决不同？

Intermediary are all did not inform obligation why different sentence？

　　据悉，无本地户籍的梁先生是通过同一家中介公司在广州购买第二套房，中介公司对梁先生的情况了解。根据广州版“限购令”，2010年10月15日起，能够提供在本市1年以上纳税证明或社会保险缴纳证明的非本市户籍居民家庭，只能在本市新购买一套商品住房，违反规定的，房地产交易登记部门将不予受理。中介公司没有提供证据证实已将上述政策告知梁先生，有明显的过错。

It is reported，Without this locality census register of Mr. Liang is through the same home intermediary company in guangzhou to purchase second suite，Intermediary company to Mr. Liang understanding。According to guangzhou version“限购 make”，October 15, 2010，In this city can provide more than one year tax documents or social insurance pay proof of this city residents of the family，In this city can only buy one set of new commercial housing，Against the rules，Real estate trade registration department will not be considered。Intermediary company provided no evidence that the policy has told Mr. Liang，The fault of the obvious。

　　而因限购令腰斩的豪宅买卖合同中，中介公司同样有未告知的过错，不同的是，买家梁小姐已在广州拥有三套房。近十年，国家连续出台了抑制房价上涨调控政策，限购限贷明显，尽管全国各地地方性限购细则松紧不一，但第三套房以上的住房是明令禁止购买的。在媒体铺天盖地的宣传中，梁小姐得知自己属于限购对象并非难事。在该案中，梁小姐是否隐瞒房产权属不得而知，双方确实均有过错，因此法院各打二十大板并无不当。

And because of 限购 make the cut the sales contract in a person of extraordinary powers curtilage，Intermediary companies also have failed to inform fault，Different is，Buyers LiangXiaoJie has set up a file in the guangzhou has three suites。Nearly 10 years，Countries on the continuous rising house prices inhibition control policy，限购 credit limit is obvious，Although all over the country 限购 rules different local reasonable，But the third suite of above is banned in the housing purchase。In the intensive media coverage of the propaganda，LiangXiaoJie learned that he belongs to 限购 object is not difficult。In the case of，LiangXiaoJie conceal property ownership is known，Both sides are really fault，So the court playing big board and all 20 when。