通讯员欣慰 记者王翔

As wang xiang reporter correspondent gratified

　　宣传单和样板房均有标注，邻居家也户户都有，却唯独徐女士买的12楼房屋没有安装“飘窗”，恼怒之下，徐女士将开发商告上法庭，要求对方补偿损失3万元。日前，因为合同未约定，徐女士的诉讼遭到宝山法院判决驳回。

Flyer and example room have the mark，Neighbors and family all have，But ms xu buy the 12th floor houses not installed“Wave window”，Under wrath，Xu lady will developers to court，Demand the other party to compensate for the loss of 30000 yuan。a，Because the contract did not agree，Xu lady's suit was baoshan court rejected。

　　2010年7月29日，徐女士经过不断比较，看中了宝山区莲花山路上的一套12层小高层顶楼房屋，暂测面积为 88.41平方米，每平方米单价16966.41元，总房价款为150万元，与开发商签订了《预售合同》后，预付了定金。

On July 29th, 2010，Ms xu through continuous comparison，Take a fancy to the lotus road baoshan district a set of 12 layer small high-rise attic building，Temporary measuring area of 88.41 square meters，Unit price 16966.41 yuan per square metre，Total house money for 1.5 million yuan，With the developers signed《Open to booking a contract》after，Advance the deposit。

　　今年1月4日交接房屋，双方确认，该房屋的实测建筑面积为比预测面积少了0.18平方米，总房价款也少了3000元，徐女士付清了全部房款，并在一份《房屋验收交接表》上签字确认，载明：兹确认系争房屋验收合格，予以接收。

January 4, houses handover，Both sides affirm，The building of the building area is less than forecast area 0.18 square meters，Total house money also less 3000 yuan，Xu lady paid all house money，And in a《Building acceptance handover table》sign，stated：We confirm system for building acceptance，To receive。

　　一个月后，徐女士发现南面卧室的窗是朝内凹进的，但合同附件上房屋建筑设计及平面图中，南面卧室的窗与外墙面是平行的，窗未向内凹进，即有开发商所宣称的“飘窗”，遂再次找到开发商要求补偿合理费用，但遭到开发商拒绝。

After a month，Xu woman found south of the bedroom window is the ChaoNa indenting，But the contract accessory buildings in design and plan，South of the bedroom window and outside is parallel，Window not inward indenting，There is a developer said“Wave window”，Hence again find developers for compensation reasonable expenses，But was refused to developers。

　　3月底，徐女士向宝山法院起诉，认为开发商在售房时，拿出来的该房型房屋销售宣传资料以及该房型样板房中，南面卧室窗户和外墙面均是平行的，窗户均未向内凹进，都有 “飘窗”。飘窗的面积虽然不计入房屋建筑面积，但是其他楼层都有这个附赠的面积，所以要求参照房屋的实际单价计算损失。鉴于南面卧室窗户朝内凹进0.75米，窗户的宽度为1.75米，所以减少的飘窗面积为1.3125平方米，再乘以系争房屋每平方米16966.41元的单价，总价是22000多元，再考虑到采光视野受限，整个房屋的格局有影响，所以用3万元计算损失。

By the end of march，Ms xu to baoshan court，Think that development business is in when housing，Out of the room in the housing sales promotional material and the room in example room，South the bedroom window and outside are parallel，The Windows were not inward indenting，have “Wave window”。Wave the area of the window while not included in the housing area，But other floor has the bonus area，So the requirement with reference to the actual housing price calculation loss。In view of the south the bedroom window ChaoNa indenting 0.75 meters，The window width is 1.75 meters，So reduce the window covers an area of 1.3125 square meters，Then multiplied by the system for building the unit price of 16966.41 yuan per square metre，Total price is 22000 yuan，Then considering the daylighting limited vision，The whole building pattern have influence，So with $30000 loss calculation。

　　庭审中被告开发商辩称，预售合同附件只是标示了系争房屋的基本位置，不能看出具体窗户的问题。签约时，销售人员告知过原告该是顶层，不是标准层，样板房是根据2至11楼的标准层来设计的。原告购房时知道顶层比10楼、11楼的单价优惠很多，10楼、11楼的单价是18300元，系争房屋的单价不到17000元。

Hearing the defendant argued that developers，Open to booking a contract accessory just marking the system for building the basic position，Can't see the problem of specific window。When signing，Sales staff told over the plaintiff this is top，Not standard layer，Example room is based on two to 11 floor of the standard layer to design。The plaintiff when buying know than the top 10 floor、11 floor of a lot of more favourable price，10 floor、11 floor of the unit price is 18300 yuan，Is the house price for less than 17000 yuan。

　　同时认为，预售合同补充条款约定，样板房及售楼资料仅供参考，系争房屋情况应当以预售合同为准。交房时，原告验收了房屋且签收了房屋验收表，原告当时对南面卧室窗户也未提出异议。系争房屋南面卧室窗户凹进去的部分是不计算建筑面积的，故建筑面积并未因此减少，不同意原告的诉讼请求。

At the same time that，Open to booking a contract supplementary provisions prescribed，Example room and sales information is only for reference，System for housing conditions should be open to booking a contract shall prevail。When making a room，The plaintiff acceptance the house and sign in the house acceptance list，The plaintiff was south of bedroom window was not to raise an objection。System for building the south bedroom window dent part is not calculated floor area，The construction area of not so reduce，Don't agree to the plaintiff's litigation request。

　　法庭经过调查得知，该房屋南面卧室窗户和外墙是在一个平面上，而墙的外立面向外凸出，与空调架在一个平面上，由此显得窗户向内凹进，即没有“飘窗”。而该建筑的2至11楼南面卧室窗户和外墙不在一个平面上，与空调架却在一个平面上，由此显得有“飘窗”。

The court that through investigation，This house south bedroom window and exterior wall is in a plane，And made of wall facing the bulge，And air conditioning rack in a plane，This is the window inward indenting，There is no“Wave window”。And the building two to 11 south building bedroom window and exterior wall is not a plane，And air conditioning rack is in a plane，This appears to have“Wave window”。

　　法院认为，合同附件及平面图是标示墙体中心线的单线图，并未标示南面卧室窗户的具体位置，仅确认系争房屋建筑面积为88.41平方米，且根据《房屋交接书》，系争房屋的实测建筑面积为88.23平方米，两者相差0.18平方米，双方又以该实测建筑面积为依据结算了房款。鉴于被告交付的系争房屋建筑面积经过原、被告双方认可，且上述合同中又未约定被告赠送原告不计入建筑面积的南面卧室“飘窗”，故原告的相关主张缺乏依据。

The court said that，The attachment of the contract and the plan is to show wall of the center line of the single line diagram，Did not mark the location of the south the bedroom window，Only confirmed system for housing construction area of 88.41 square meters，And according to《Housing transfer book》，System for the house the floor area is 88.23 square meters，The difference of 0.18 square meters，Both sides and the construction area of the measured settlement based on the house money。In view of the defendant delivery system for housing construction area after the original、The accused by both parties，And the above contract and have no agreement on the term of the defendant present the plaintiff not included in the construction area of the south of the bedroom“Wave window”，So the plaintiff's claims related to lack of basis。

　　原告主张系争房屋南面卧室窗体状况与房屋销售宣传资料不符、与购房时被告展示的该房型实物样板房不符，但根据双方签订的《预售合同》补充条款第3条的约定，被告所购房屋面积、结构、装修设备标准均以合同及其附件为准，样板房及其样板区域以及售楼资料仅供展示、参考，故对原告以此主张被告违约亦不予支持。

The plaintiff claims system for building the south bedroom form status and housing sales promotional material discrepancy、And when buying the defendant show the room with real example room，But according to signed by both parties《Open to booking a contract》Article 3 the terms of the supplementary conditions，The defendant purchased housing area、structure、Decorate equipment standards are in the contract and its accessories shall prevail，Model and example room area and sales information is only for display、reference，Subject to the plaintiff to advocate the defendant breach of contract will also not support。

　　此案承办法官提醒，购买房屋等大宗商品，一定要以合同为准，要分清宣传单或样品与实物的区别，特别是房屋的楼层、位置、环境不同，就可能造成房屋整体结构或部分结构的差别，这些差别必须在合同中予以体现。

The judge reminded the case，Buy a house and other commodities，Must to the contract shall prevail，Want to distinguish flyer or samples and physical difference，Especially the house floor、position、Environment different，They might create housing overall structure or part of the structure of the difference，These differences must be reflected in the contract。