近日，国务院发展研究中心下属的中国发展研究基金会发布报告称，当前保障房建设中存在顶层设计不够、供需矛盾突出、地方政府不够积极、管理工作亟待规范等四大突出问题。

recently，The state council development research center of the subordinate the China development research foundation released the report says，The current security room existing in the construction of the top design is not enough、Outstanding contradiction between supply and demand、The local government is not positive、Management work to regulate and so on four big problems。

　　参与调研的北京大学经济学院教授平新乔称，“去年建设的保障房有一半能落到实处就不错了。由于地方保障房资金一直处于紧缺状态，所以在各地方上报的保障房数量中，至少有一半以上是由国企和企业员工福利房组成的。”

Participate in the research of the Beijing university school of economics professor flat new Joe says，“The construction of last year guarantee room half can into effect is good。Because the local security room funds has been in a state of shortage，So in the local reported security room number in，At least more than half is by the state-owned enterprise and enterprise employee benefits of room。”

　　截至2011年底，约3000万户将近1亿人受惠于保障房建设。这3000万户中，有2650万户城镇低收入和中等偏下收入家庭的住房困难通过实物解决，此外还有近450万户通过货币补贴形式受益。这是不久前住建部公布的保障房受益者统计。与之对比，“一半保障房实为福利房”的机构调研结论，两者反差之巨大实在让人感到震惊。

By the end of 2011，About 30 million households nearly 100 million people benefit from the security room construction。This in 30 million households，There are 26.5 million households urban low and middle rdi income family housing difficulties through the real solution，In addition there are nearly 4.5 million households through the monetary subsidies benefit form。This is not long ago live JianBu published safeguard room beneficiaries statistics。By contrast，“Half safeguard room actually welfare room”Organization research conclusion，The contrast of giant really let a person feel shocked。

　　令人困惑的是，公众究竟应该相信哪个数据呢？住建部公布的相关数据，是否只是地方上报数据的简单汇总，有没有认真调查过这么多保障房究竟都保障了谁？

Confusing is，The public should believe what? Which data？Live JianBu published related data，If just place the simple summary report data，Have earnest investigation have so many security room what have safeguard the who？

　　“十二五”期间全国规划建设的3600万套保障房建设，一直引发巨大争议，甚至有人称之为另一种“大跃进”。可是，这两年的建设实践表明，尽管质量低劣之类的事故频发，但在数量上至少是基本完成了。

“1025”The national planning and construction during the 36 million sets of security housing construction，Has been caused great controversy，Even someone called another“Great leap forward”。but，The two years of practice showed that the construction，Although such as poor quality of frequent accidents，But in the quantity is at least basic completed。

　　如今我们才恍然大悟，原来是“保障房不够，福利房来凑”！机关单位、国有企业等面向内部的自建福利分房，竟然也被计算为保障房建设任务，实在是荒谬至极。“一半保障房实为福利房”不仅完全背离了保障房建设的初衷，而且事实上反而给既得利益者第二次福利分房创造了绝好的机会和借口。

Now we just take a tumble，It is“Safeguard room is not enough，Welfare room to add”！Agency unit、The state-owned enterprise internal self-built housing benefits，Should also be calculated to ensure room construction task，It is absurd to extremely。“Half safeguard room actually welfare room”Not only completely deviated from the original intention of the construction of the safeguard room，And in fact but give vested interest second welfare time created a great opportunity and an excuse。

　　福利房冒充保障房，让这项民生政策落实到最后，等于是弱势群体只拿到被保障的虚名，既得利益者却拿到被保障的实利。这不仅是极度不公平的，而且已然是住房改革的倒退，公众当然无法接受。单位集资建房也好，自建福利房也罢，都是被现行法律所禁止的，所谓保障房就应该是由财政补贴兴建并且面向中低收入群体公开分配，拿单位内部福利分房来凑数，不仅是对中央政府和社会公众的欺骗敷衍，更是对各种垄断福利的直接鼓励和支持，会愈发加剧社会的不公和贫富的差距。

Welfare house posing as safeguard room，Let the people's livelihood policies have been implemented to the end，The vulnerable groups and got only guaranteed reclame，Vested interest but to be security net profit。This is not only very unfair，And already is the housing reform back，The public of course can't accept it。Unit fund raising house all right，Self-built or welfare house，Are the current which is prohibited by the laws，The so-called security room should be built by the financial subsidies for low-income groups and the public distribution，Take unit interior welfare housing to dine，Not only for the central government and social public cheat play，But for all kinds of monopoly benefits directly to encourage and support，Will increasingly intensifies social inequality and the gap between rich and poor。

　　用来给弱势群体兜底的保障房，与作为垄断福利存在的福利房，两者本来是完全对立的概念，前者要支持后者该打击；可是，当保障房建设成为一项量化任务，追究政绩的官员居然神奇地将两者合二为一。

Used to give out the vulnerable groups of safeguard room，And as a monopoly welfare existing welfare room，Both was contrary concepts，The former to support the latter this strike；but，When security room construction become a quantitative task，The officials shall be investigated for achievements that magically will both close 2 for one。

　　政府的责任、中央的要求、公众的期待，在那一刻都是虚伪的，完成任务得到政绩的冲动，让政府官员完全忘了“为了什么而建保障房”。弱者住有所居的根本需求，不应该成为官员的政绩游戏。

The government's responsibility、The requirements of the central、Public expectations，At that moment are false，Complete the task for the impulse of achievements，Let the government officials completely forget“For the sake of what and build security room”。The weak live in somewhat the fundamental demand，Should not become officials achievements game。

　　“一半保障房实为福利房”，不仅是保障房建设的失职渎职，同时更是一种很过分的公开欺骗，理当被严格追究责任。与此同时，不合法的福利分房同样应该得到彻查，慷全体公众之慨谋既得群体之利，不是建设保障房而是瓜分国有资产。

“Half safeguard room actually welfare room”，Not only is the guarantee of the construction of the room dereliction of duty，It is a kind of very excessive public cheating，Should be the strict responsibility。meanwhile，Illegal welfare housing should also get investigate，Be generous at the expense of the public for have group of the，Not construction security room but divide up the state-owned assets。