穆先生曾先后两次为姐姐捐献骨髓，称捐献未救活姐姐，自己也未得到商定的90万补偿款。

Mr Jose has twice for sister to donate bone marrow,According to contribution did not save her sister,Oneself also has not been agreed 900000 bonuses.

　　于是，穆先生起诉姐夫索要补偿款。

so,Mr Jose, Sue brother-in-law ask for compensation.

　　昨天上午，怀柔法院开庭审理此案。被告方表示，补偿协议是在原告“拒捐”胁迫下签署的，协议应无效。

Yesterday morning,Huairou court hearing the case.The defendant said,Compensation agreement is on the plaintiff"Refuse to donate"Signed under duress,Agreement shall be null and void.

原告 The plaintiff

姐姐去世姐夫毁约 Sister brother-in-law died to break

　　昨天庭审时，原告穆先生称，因自己身体残疾干不了重活，都是姐姐照顾他，所以姐弟俩关系很好。但没想到，一直身体很好的姐姐突然被查出得了白血病。

When the trial yesterday,The plaintiff Mr Jose said,Because of his physical disabilities do heavy work,Is the elder sister take care of him,So the sister and the relationship is very good.But I didn't think,Body has been very good elder sister suddenly was diagnosed with leukemia.

　　“我50多岁了，身体也不好，但要救姐姐，我还是到医院做了配型检查，准备捐献。”穆先生称，配型成功后，2010年12月10日，他第一次为姐姐捐献5袋骨髓，每袋200CC、干细胞300CC，血液600CC。但术后姐姐病情并没见好。2011年4月11日，他再次为姐姐捐骨髓。

"I am more than 50 years old,The body is not good,But to save elder sister,I was made over to the hospital to check,Ready to donate."Mr Jose said,After the match,On December 10th, 2010,He donation of 5 bags of the bone marrow to sister for the first time,Each bag 200 cc/Stem 300 cc,Blood 600 cc.But I can't meet sister illness and postoperative.On April 11, 2011,He again for sister to donate bone marrow.

　　“第一次捐得很多，第二次移植前，我跟姐夫签订经济补偿协议，约定15年给90万经济补偿。但第二次捐献后，姐姐病情恶化去世，姐夫拒绝付补偿金。”穆先生表示，为此，他起诉姐夫索要商定好的补偿款。

"Contribute a lot for the first time,A second before transplantation,Brother-in-law and I signed the agreement on economic compensation,15 years in a 900000 economic compensation.But the second time after donation,My sister died deterioration,Brother-in-law refused to pay compensation."Mr Jose,To do this,He sued him for agreed good compensation.

被告 The defendant

不签协议原告不捐 Don't sign the agreement the plaintiffs don't donate

　　“协议是不平等条约。”死者穆女士的女婿张先生代表被告方称，对于穆先生2010年首次捐骨髓，全家人不仅感动，还给了10万多元。第二次捐献前，原告的媳妇不让原告捐，说不签协议就不捐。由于原告用拒捐作为要挟，因此协议不应具有法律效力，“协议不合法，所以我们不同意支付”。

"Protocol is unequal treaties."The dead jose's son-in-law on behalf of the defendants said Mr Zhang,For Mr Jose to donate bone marrow for the first time in 2010,Not only moved the whole family,Back to more than 100000 yuan.The second contribution before,The plaintiff's daughter-in-law don't donate to the plaintiff,Said don't sign the agreement don't donate.Due to the plaintiff refused to donate as blackmail,So the agreement should not be legally binding,"Agreement is not legally,So we don't agree to pay".

　　同时，张先生称，正是原告拖延捐献时间，导致岳母第二次受捐后没两天就死了。

At the same time,Mr Zhang said,Delay time is the plaintiff,Cause my mother-in-law died two days after the second donor.

　　庭审时，死者穆女士的另外两个弟弟都来到法院作证。

When the trial,The dead jose's two other brother to court to testify.

　　最小的四弟称，他们姐弟共4人，姐姐是老大，原告是老三。“姐姐病了，我们兄弟3人都想捐骨髓，并都去医院做了检查，结果医生说我80%匹配，原告100%匹配。原告第二次捐献前签协议时，我在现场，90万元金额由原告媳妇提议。”

A minimum of four brother said,They are siblings, a total of four people,My sister is the boss,The plaintiff is old."My sister is ill,We brother three people want to donate bone marrow,And went to the hospital for check,The doctor said I 80% matching results,The plaintiff 100% matching.The plaintiff second contribution before sign the agreement,I at the scene,The amount of 900000 yuan daughter-in-law proposal."

　　针对协议是自愿签署，还是迫于原告拒绝捐献而签署，四弟想了半天称：“两者都有。”

According to agreement is voluntary to sign,Or signed by the plaintiff refused to donate,Four brother think along while, said:"both."

　　该案尚在审理中。

The case is still pending.