长江商报消息 Yangtze river commercial daily news

　　重庆男孩小凌(化名)11岁时父母协议离婚，把价值数百万的房产给了他。今年小凌14岁，父亲突然反悔，状告儿子要求撤销赠与。法院认为，在双方婚姻关系事实上因离婚协议得以解除的情况下，赠与财产的目的已经实现。法院最终驳回小凌父亲的诉讼请求。

Chongqing boy small ling(aliases)11 years old when parents divorce agreement，The value of the property to his millions。Small ling 14 years old this year，Father suddenly back，Against the son asks revoke the gift。The court said that，Both sides in the marriage in fact for divorce agreement to remove，The purpose of the gift property has been realized。The court ultimately rejected small ling father's lawsuit。

　　2009年初，小凌11岁时，父母因为感情不和，协议离婚。“为了保证他健康成长，我们约定把夫妻的共同财产都给儿子。即在江北区、渝北区、北部新区，大大小小一共有6处房产的全部或部分产权。”小凌的母亲说，小凌一直跟母亲生活在一起。还在读书的小凌俨然是一个手握数百万的富翁。其实3年来，财产一直没过户到他的名下。

In early 2009，Small ling 11 years old，Parents don't because of affection，Divorce agreement。“In order to ensure his healthy growth，We agreed to the common property of husband and wife to son。Namely in the jiangbei、YuBeiOu、Chongqing new north zone (CNNZ，Greatly small six homes, all or part of the property。”Small ling's mother said，Small ling has been with the mother life together。Also in the small study has a mellow hand millions of millionaire。Actually 3 years，Property hasn't been transfer ownership to his name。

　　离婚3年后，父亲后悔了。“我离婚后，身无分文，生活困难。赠与的财产在交付前，可以撤销。”这是父亲起诉小凌的理由。

Divorced three years later，Father regret the。“I got divorced，penniless，Life difficult。The gift property before delivery，May be revoked。”This is the reason for small father sues bullying。

　　江北区法院审理此案后，日前作出一审判决。法院认为，在双方婚姻关系事实上因离婚协议得以解除的情况下，赠与财产的目的已经实现。相关财产是否办理变更登记，并不影响协议的效力和赠与的效力。此外，对小凌父亲提出已无任何财产，严重影响生活的理由，因为缺乏事实依据，法院没有采信。法院最终驳回小凌父亲的诉讼请求。据重庆晨报

Jiangbei court after the case，Make a verdict。The court said that，Both sides in the marriage in fact for divorce agreement to remove，The purpose of the gift property has been realized。Whether related property deals with change to register，Does not affect the validity of the agreement and the effectiveness of the gift。In addition，For small ling father raised has no property，The serious influence reason for living，Because of the lack of facts，Court disallowed。The court ultimately rejected small ling father's lawsuit。According to chongqing morning paper