邹恒甫，1962年出生，湖南岳阳人，经济学家，1998年至2007年5月在北京大学任教，现为世界银行研究部终身高级经济学家。
ZouHengFu，Born in 1962，Hunan YueYangRen，economists，1998 to May 2007 in Beijing university，Now for the world bank senior economist at life。
新京报讯 北京大学决定起诉邹恒甫，并于昨日将起诉书递交法院，相关工作正式进入法律程序。昨天，北大新闻中心发布了关于“邹恒甫微博”所涉内容的第三次声明。声明中称，邹恒甫的表现越来越成为一场“闹剧”，“时至今日，邹恒甫未能提供任何证据，其言行前后矛盾、出尔反尔、表里不一。”
The Beijing news - Beijing university decided to bring a suit against ZouHengFu，And in the indictment to submit court yesterday，Related working officially enters the legal procedure。yesterday，Peking University press center released about“ZouHengFu micro bo”The content involved the third statement。Said in a statement，ZouHengFu performance becomes more and more become a“farce”，“today，ZouHengFu failed to produce any evidence，Their words and deeds inconsistent、Back and fill、duplicity。”
北大称“决不能容忍”邹恒甫行为
Peking University says“Will not tolerate”ZouHengFu behavior
8月21日，邹恒甫在实名认证微博发布内容称“北大院长在梦桃源北大医疗室吃饭时只要看到漂亮服务员就必然下手把她们奸淫。北大教授系主任也不例外。所以，梦桃源生意火爆。除了邹恒甫，北大淫棍太多”。
August 21，ZouHengFu rule in authentication micro Po release content says“Peking University dean in the dream taoyuan north treatment room when having a meal as long as see beautiful waiter will inevitably be laid hands on him the they commit adultery。Peking University professor dean is no exception。so，Dream taoyuan business is hot。In addition to ZouHengFu，North immoral man too much”。
北大纪委监察室为此成立了专门调查组，并“以最大耐心期待邹恒甫提供具体证据”。
Peking University discipline inspection commission JianChaShi therefore has established a special investigation team，and“With the maximum patience looking forward to ZouHengFu provide specific evidence”。
北大认为，这一事件的发展过程中，邹恒甫的表现越来越成为一场“闹剧”，继续期望他提供所谓“证据”来全面彻底查清事件真相，不仅不切实际，而且毫无意义。
Peking University think，This event during the process of development，ZouHengFu performance becomes more and more become a“farce”，Continue to expect him to provide the so-called“evidence”To find out the truth thorough events，Not only unrealistic，And there is no significance。
这份声明指责邹恒甫“歪曲事实、蒙蔽真相，欺骗隐身、误导舆论，转移视线、混淆视听。这种无视法律、愚弄公众的拙劣行径，不仅是极端不负责任的，而且破坏了现代文明社会的基本行为准则”，并认为邹恒甫的这些做法是“决不能容忍的”。
The statement ZouHengFu accused“Distorted the facts、Hoodwink the truth，Cheat stealth、Mislead public opinion，Transfer line of sight、Confusing the public。This kind of ignoring the law、Fool the public's bad behavior，Is not only extremely irresponsible，And destroy the modern civilized society the basic code of conduct”，And that ZouHengFu these measures is“Must not be tolerated”。
北大欢迎负责任地反映问题
North welcome responsibly reflect problems
北大新闻中心的声明称，这一罕见的恶劣事件严重损害了北大的声誉和教师队伍的形象，严重践踏了北大院长、系主任和教授们的尊严，严重伤害了北大师生员工和校友们的感情，也伤及了梦桃源餐厅的无辜员工。
Peking University press center said in a statement，This rare severe event seriously damage the north's reputation and image of teachers，Serious trample on the north dean、The dean and professors dignity，Serious hurt Peking University staff and students and alumni feelings，Also injury and the dream of the restaurant's innocent staff。
北大纪委监察室有关负责人此前曾表示，梦桃源餐厅是独立于北大的单位，其所有工作人员均与北大没有任何劳动人事关系。
Peking University discipline inspection commission JianChaShi officials had earlier said，Dream taoyuan restaurant is independent of north unit，All its staff with Peking University are no labor human relations。
北大还在声明中提到，北大纪委监察室一如既往欢迎社会各界（包括邹恒甫）继续以负责任的态度依法依规反映问题，但同时“正告仍在侵害北京大学声誉的其他个人或机构，立即停止违法行为”。
Peking University is still in statement，Peking University discipline inspection commission JianChaShi as always welcome the social from all walks of life（Including ZouHengFu）To continue in a responsible manner in accordance with the rules in accordance with law reflects the problem，But at the same time“Warn is still in the enroach on Beijing university the reputation of the other individual or institution，Immediately stop the illegal behavior”。
这是北大在8月23日以来作出的第三次声明。北大新闻中心称，“如无特殊情况，不再对此事件做出进一步回应。”
This is on August 23,, Peking University since the third statement to make。Peking University press center said，“Barring special circumstances，This event will no longer make further response。”
当事人
The parties
邹恒甫：不希望打官司 不害怕吃官司
ZouHengFu：Don't want to engage in a lawsuit is not afraid be sued
表示其对北大还是有感情的，不认为自己构成诽谤
Said the north still have feelings，Don't think of myself constitute defamation
邹恒甫将如何回应北大的起诉？截至昨晚9时，邹恒甫未回复本报的约访邮件。
ZouHengFu will how to respond to north of action？As of 9 PM last night，ZouHengFu did not reply to our YaoFang of mail。
8月30日凌晨，在接受本报电话专访时，邹恒甫曾表示，自己对北大还是有感情的，“我不希望和北大打官司，但是我也不害怕吃官司。”邹恒甫说，他愿意为中国教育事业上法庭。
In the morning on August 30,，In an interview with the telephone，ZouHengFu said，To Peking University still have feelings，“I don't hope and north engage in a lawsuit，But I will not be afraid be sued。”ZouHengFu said，Him would like to for China's education cause in court。
北京汉卓律师事务所律师郭聪称，邹恒甫如若应诉，在法庭上需履行自己的举证责任，公布相关举报证据。
Beijing han zhuo law firm lawyers GuoCong says，ZouHengFu if appearance，In court should perform their burden，Publish the report evidence。
8月30日，邹恒甫曾将部分转至北大纪委监察室的举报材料发给本报。记者发现，这些材料均为网友转发给邹恒甫的，未涉及“梦桃源事件”，其余大部分材料邹恒甫均未公布在网上。
On August 30,，ZouHengFu had transferred to north part of JianChaShi discipline inspection commission report material to our newspaper。Reporter discovery，These materials are all net friend forward to the ZouHengFu，Did not involve“Dream taoyuan events”，Most of the rest of the material ZouHengFu were not published on the Internet。
对于这些材料的真实性，邹恒甫认为，他不可能一一去核实，而应由北大纪委监察室去查，自己也只是转发别人提交的材料，“我不认为自己构成诽谤”。
For these the authenticity of material，ZouHengFu think，He is impossible to verify，And should by Peking University discipline inspection commission JianChaShi to check，Oneself also just forward others the materials submitted，“I don't think they constitute defamation”。
声音
voice
@石扉客：起诉邹恒甫是北大的权利，但我实在不赞成这一招。邹先生自己一手葬送自己的公信力，作为学者已经付出了代价。北大作为儒林领袖，对邹不负责任的言论表明态度即可，还应表态欢迎公众的批评与监督。所谓清者自清，浊者自浊。真正有必要诉诸法律的，不是北大，而是梦桃源饭店以及该店女服务员。
@ stone leaf guest：Sue ZouHengFu is the rights of Peking University，But I really don't approve of this recruit。Mr. Zou mega-church he ruin their credibility，As scholars have paid the price。Peking University as the scholars' circle leader，To zou irresponsible remarks suggest attitude can，Still should declare welcome the public criticism and supervision。The so-called clear person since qing dynasty，Turbidity person since the turbidity。Really necessary to resort to the law，Peking University is not，But the dream taoyuan hotel and the restaurant waitress。
@五七：零成本的微博造谣可以休矣。北大有疾，但不能被私怨绑架，更非泼污可以治也。
@ jiao tone：Zero cost micro bo rumormongering can Sue yi。Peking University have disease，But cannot be SiYuan kidnapping，More than spilled pollution can treat also。
@胡舒立：既然起诉，下一步法院是否受理，官司如何发展，整个事件是否可循法治轨道发展，成为值得关注的案例。
@ HuShuLi：Since the prosecution，The next court whether or not to accept the，Case how to develop，The whole event whether to follow the rule of law development orbit，Become a notable case。
新京报记者 萧辉 许路阳 （记者郭少峰）
The Beijing news reporter XiaoHui xu Yang road （Reporter GuoShaoFeng）
