近日，一条内容为“冒死揭露高考阅卷内幕”的帖子在天涯论坛上引人关注。笔者查证后发现，这一帖子在2006年就曾出现过，且此后多次在高校招生录取时期“现身”网络。今年，它又成“新料”。

recently，A content for the“Expose the university entrance exam read die inside”Post in the BBS that attention。The author found after verification，This post in 2006 has seen，And since then many times in college enrollment period“appeared”network。This year，It into“The new material”。

　　7月16日，网友“sqlx66”在天涯论坛发帖，题为：“北京高考阅卷师冒死揭露内幕：学生的前途就这样被耽误！(转载)”

July 16,，the“sqlx66”In the BBS Posting，titled：“Beijing the university entrance exam read die division expose inside：The student's future was delay！(reproduced)”

　　在一周时间内，该贴凭借54442人次的点击率、828条回帖成为热门话题。

In one week，Stick with 54442 people of hits、Article 828 return card be hot topic。

　　该文的作者自称是一名中学教师，参加了高考阅卷。他揭露了自己亲身经历的一些黑幕：比如某位阅卷女研究生水平低下，学生解题方法正确，却因不是标准答案上的解法而不能得分；本来规定每道题有两人复查，但复查时一些老师为追求进度，不判定题目正确与否，只看分数累加是否正确；甚至在阅卷最后一天，已经完成任务的物理组老师被要求去支援生物组进行复查。

The author of this paper claiming to be a high school teacher，Attended the university entrance exam read。He has uncovered his experience some shady decision-making：Such as a reading female graduates level is low，Students problem solving method is correct，But because of the standard answer is not on solutions and can't score；Each question originally provisions with two people review，But when the teacher as the pursuit of some progress，Don't judge subject is correct or not，Only see score accumulate is correct；Even in reading at the end of the day，The teacher has been completed tasks ahlstroms_konsult_&_dataservice was asked to support biological group for review。

　　众多网友骂声一片，网友“一朵花乱乱飞”说：“真没想到，这太不负责任了，让人无法容忍。” 有网友继续爆料说自己的母亲在参与过一次高考阅卷后，就因为“不公正”而不愿再参与阅卷。而也有一部分网友发现：这是一张几乎年年都会被再次“翻新”的旧帖。

Many users to a piece of gearing，the“A flower a disorderly fly”said：“I didn't know that，It's irresponsible，Let people can stand。” Netizens to continue his mother in leaks said in a college entrance examination after reading，Just because“Don't just”And don't want to participate in reading。And also have part of the Internet found that：This is a almost every year are again“renovation”Old post。

　　根据笔者的调查，该帖是一篇早在2006年便出现过的老帖子。爆料者是谁已经无从考证。而文中提到的所谓高考阅卷“内幕”，是否存在呢？笔者向一位曾多次参与高考阅卷的北京某高中老师求证。

According to the author's investigation，Defer is a in early 2006 he appeared old post。A person who is already no looking。And the so-called the university entrance exam read mentioned in the text“insider”，? If there？The author to a has repeatedly involved in the university entrance exam read some of the Beijing high school teacher and verification。

　　该教师向笔者介绍说，高考阅卷中间会有多次复查程序，“前期判卷的时候有初查和大组检查，后期核分的时候也有审查。”

The teacher to the author introduced said，The university entrance exam read will have multiple reexamination among program，“Early, when ChuZha have to check and large groups，Later when the nuclear points review。”

　　笔者了解到，北京地区从两三年前开始逐步推行“无纸化”阅卷，所有的判卷活动都在电脑上进行。每个老师只批改一张卷子中的某一两个题目，每一题最少有两个老师批改。“老师在判卷的时候都是随机的，不知道别的老师改这道题的时候给了几分。如果我们两个人给的分数之间相差超过3分，这道题就要交给第三个人重新批改。”

The author understands，Beijing began gradually carried out from two or three years ago“paperless”reading，All the activities to roll on the computer。Each teacher corrects a examination paper only one of the two questions，Every problem has at least two the teachers mark。“The teacher in the convicted, when are random，Don't know the other teacher changes this problem to some of the time。If our two people to score difference between more than three points，This problem will be to the third person to correcting。”

　　关于帖子上网友指责的“物理组支援生物组”，这位老师说“根本不可能”。在北京地区，各个科目的判卷地点是不同的，比如语文在北大改，数学在清华批，文理科综合中不同科目都在不同的地方改卷。

On the Internet about post accused“Ahlstroms_konsult_&_dataservice support biological group”，The teacher said“May not”。In the Beijing area，Each subject to roll the place is different，Such as Chinese in the north to change，Mathematics in tsinghua group，Different subjects in the comprehensive arts and sciences in different places change book。

　　高考判卷的人员构成不同，包括中学老师、大学老师和一些在校研究生。“我认为这是正常的现象，毕竟考生的价值观是多元的，应该让不同的人评判。如果说担心阅卷研究生只拿钱不负责任，我觉得还是个别现象，毕竟他们也是从高考时期过来的。”老师说。

The university entrance exam sentenced to volume of the different personnel structure，Including high school teacher、University teachers and some college graduate student。“I think this is normal phenomenon，After all the examinee values is multiple，Should let different people judge。If read only take money to graduate students worry about being irresponsible，I feel or individual phenomenon，After all, they also come from the university entrance exam period。”The teacher said。

　　这位老师同时表示，高考阅卷确实还存在一些问题，但就自己二三十年的感受看已经在慢慢进步了。“从考试到出分数只有短短两周时间，留给我们判卷的时间最多一周。7天，7万多份考卷。我们都知道高考的重要性，只能尽力做到最好。”

The teacher also said，The university entrance exam read there still exist some problems，But is the feeling of the two hundred and thirty already in progress slowly see......。“From the test scores to out two weeks is only a short time，We found the time to roll up a week。7 days，More than 70000 papers。We all know the importance of the university entrance exam，Can only do the best。”

　　其实老帖被“翻新”再度成为话题的情况时有发生。“翻旧账”的现象到底为何时有发生？记者采访了南京大学新闻传播学院副教授胡翼青。

Actually the old post was“renovation”Once again become the topic has happened。“Bring up”The phenomenon of exactly why do often happened？The reporter interviewed news spread of nanjing university assistant professor HuYiQing。

　　他认为这是信息传播的正常现象。“人们喜欢翻的问题基本上都是实际并未解决、能引起普遍担忧的事情。拿曾经的帖子说事，主要是希望这个问题能够再次引起重视，进而使得问题进一步解决。”胡翼青说。

He thinks that this is the information transmission of normal phenomenon。“People like to turn the problem basically is not actually solve、Can arouse common worried about things。And once the post move，Main is hope the problem can once again take seriously，And then make the problem further solved。”HuYiQing said。

　　但这并不意味着所有被翻出来的帖子都是真实的。胡翼青说，网民们在转发帖子的时候不会特别求证内容的真实性，而是寻找能引起关注的兴奋点。以这次高考阅卷公平问题为例，跟帖转发量多只是意味着社会在关注、督促高考公平，并不代表网友们认同帖子的真实。

But this does not mean that all interpret the posts are real。HuYiQing said，Internet users in forwarding post will be special confirmed the authenticity of the contents，But looking for excitement of concern。To the university entrance exam read fair as an example，The placard forward more than just means that society is in focus、Urged the university entrance exam fair，Doesn't mean net friends identity card of truth。

　　清华大学新闻与传播学院副教授王君超认为，有些网友关心某一方面的问题，上网搜索后可以轻易地发现相关信息。出于与人分享和获得共鸣的需要，在重新发布时，往往会有意无意地淡化其发布的时间。如果网友因为“旧帖”最初发布时间的虚化而被误导，就会在一定程度上导致信息紊乱，引起舆论偏差。

Tsinghua university, associate professor at the school of journalism and communication WangJunChao think，Some users care about one aspect of the problem，After searching the Internet can easily find related information。For sharing and get the need of resonance，In the new release，Often unintentionally desalination released its time。If net friend because“Old post”Originally published in time and throw the misguided，Will resulted in a degree information disorders，Deviation caused by public opinion。

　　“有时，这种情况会引起‘谣言’的发生。不过，‘旧帖新翻’、‘旧帖新炒’现象在一定程度上表达了公民对教育公平等社会热点问题的关注。”他说。

“sometimes，This condition can lead to‘rumors’happened。but，‘Old post new turn’、‘Old post new fry’Phenomenon in a certain degree of education fairness express the citizen society such as hot issues。”He said。

　　实习生 徐牧宇 崔慧莹

Interns XuMuYu CuiHuiYing