白血病男童夭折引发“拒捐”话题 Leukemia boy's aborted cause"Refused to donate"topic

　　10月21日，在5岁男孩帅帅的葬礼上，一群网友送了这个非亲非故的孩子最后一程。

On October 21,,In 5 years old boy Derek's funeral,A group of net friend sent this be neither kith nor kin child finally a ride.

　　10月17日零时55分，帅帅走完了他短短的人生。由于没能及时接受造血干细胞移植，身患白血病的帅帅失去了生存的机会。而他本来是有合适供体的，那就是他的亲生父亲，但遗憾的是，

On October 17 zero hour and 55 minutes,Derek covered his short life.Because can't timely accept hematopoietic stem cell transplantation,Suffering from leukemia dressed lost the chance of survival.And he would have had the right of the donor,It's his own father,But it is a pity that,

　　父亲拒绝了。对拒绝的原因，帅帅父母各执一词，但由这场争议引发的“拒捐”话题却发人深思。

My father refused to.For the reasons for the refusal,Derek parents each sticks to his argument,But by the controversy triggered"Refused to donate"Topic however.

白血病患儿夭折，被曝因父亲拒捐骨髓 Leukemia children aborted,Be exposed to the father rejected because donate marrow

　　去年8月，帅帅被发现罹患急性双表型白血病，只能通过造血干细胞移植才有可能康复。配型检查结果表明，帅帅的父母都能为他配型。由于父亲和帅帅血型相同、性别相同，且身体素质较好，医院确定他为首选供体。然而在治疗期间，父母双方就最佳移植时间存在很大分歧，同时由于长期化疗导致肝脏受损，帅帅一直没有进仓移植。

Last August,Derek was found suffering from acute double phenotypic leukemia,Only through the hematopoietic stem cell transplantation can be rehabilitation.Inspection results show that matches,Derek parents can he matches.Due to the father and Derek share the same blood type/Same sex,And the body quality is good,Hospital sure he is first selection donor.However, in the period of treatment,Both parents best transplant time there is a big difference,At the same time as a result of long-term chemotherapy cause liver damage,Derek has not yet come into bin transplantation.

　　今年5月，帅帅的病情进一步恶化，母亲决定放手一搏，但父亲不同意，拒绝提供造血干细胞。之后，双方矛盾进入了白热化。

In may this year,Derek was further deterioration,My mother decided to try,But the father does not agree with,Refuses to provide hematopoietic stem cells.after,The contradictions into white-hot.

　　事件经媒体曝光后在网上引起很大反响，网友们纷纷指责父亲的无情无义，并发起了名为“帅帅的100个心愿”的微公益活动。然而，无数好心人的善举终究没能挽留住这条小生命。人们开始指责甚至谩骂他的父亲。

The media events after exposure on the Internet has caused great sensation,Net friends have accused father's heartless,And launched called"Derek 100 a wish"Micro public welfare activities.however,Countless man after all the good deeds can't keep living a small life.People began to accuse even abuse his father.

　　面对巨大的舆论压力，此前一直保持沉默的父亲在孩子葬礼当天发表博文，称自己蒙受了巨大的痛苦和屈辱。

In the face of the huge pressure of public opinion,Had been keep silent father in the child funeral published bowen,Say I suffered a great pain and humiliation.

反悔拒捐应否担责，现行法律没有规定 Pull back from should bear the responsibility to donate,The current not required by law

　　近年来，有关造血干细胞捐献者“临时变卦”的事件并不少见。2011年，云南一名捐献者在受捐者已做好充分准备后反悔拒捐，使受捐者面临加速死亡的危险。在此之前，还出现过受捐者家属将拒捐者告上法庭的案例。

In recent years,The hemopoietic stem cell donor"Temporary backpedal"The event is not rare.In 2011,,Yunnan a donor in ShouJuanZhe already fully prepared from regret to donate,Make ShouJuanZhe face accelerated the risk of death.Before this,Also appeared ShouJuanZhe families will refuse to donate the court case.

　　造血干细胞捐献者反悔拒捐应该被追究法律责任吗？江苏省新沂市法院副院长魏志名告诉记者，刑法没有明确规定造血干细胞捐献者反悔构成犯罪；而且，反悔者主观上并没有非法剥夺他人生命或者伤害他人身体的故意，客观上也没有实施非法剥夺他人生命或者伤害他人身体的行为，因此不构成刑事犯罪，不需要承担刑事责任。

Hematopoietic stem cell donor back refused to donate should be investigated for legal responsibility?The paper selects xinyi city in jiangsu province, vice President of the court WeiZhi name told reporters,There is no specific provision in the criminal law hematopoietic stem cell donor back constitute a crime;and,The cop out on subjective did not rob others life or hurt others body intentionally,Objectively speaking, it also did not carry out illegal deprivation others life or hurt others the practices of the body,So does not constitute a criminal offence,Need not bear criminal responsibility.

　　“民事法律责任同样无从谈起。”魏志名说，民法调整的是平等主体的公民之间、法人之间、公民与法人之间的财产关系和人身关系。但我国法律上并不把造血干细胞视为财产，因此造血干细胞不属于民法的调整范畴。即使捐赠双方存在赠与合同，那这份合同在民法上也是无效的。更何况造血干细胞捐赠是无偿的，捐献者反悔后也不应承担民事责任。

"The civil legal liability also mentioned."WeiZhi name,Civil law is to adjust the equality between the subject of citizens/Between legal person/Between citizen and the legal person property relationships and personal relationships.But our country the law is not the hematopoietic stem cells as property,Therefore hematopoietic stem cells do not belong to the adjustment of civil law category.Even if the donation contract between the two sides gift,That this contract in civil law is also invalid.Besides hemopoietic stem cell donations are free,Donors after back nor shall bear civil liability.

　　记者了解到，无论是献血法、公益事业捐赠法，还是《人体器官移植条例》，均没有对拒捐行为所应承担的法律责任作出规定。相反，这3部法律法规均明确了捐献自愿的原则，其中《人体器官移植条例》第7条专门规定：“公民享有捐献或者不捐献其人体器官的权利。”

The reporter understands,Whether broaden/JuanZengFa public welfare undertakings,or[The human organ transplant regulations],All did not to refuse to donate actions should bear the legal liability stipulated.instead,This part 3 laws and regulations are defined contribution on the principle of voluntary participation,the[The human organ transplant regulations]Article 7 the special provisions:"Citizens enjoy contribution or not to donate their organs rights."

　　对此，有学者认为，造血干细胞捐赠是一种应当鼓励的善举，如果法律对一种善举要求过于苛刻，势必打击捐献人的捐献积极性，这势必影响到捐赠活动本身的存在和发展。

this,Some scholars think,Hematopoietic stem cell donation is an act of kindness should be encouraged,If the law of a benignity request too harsh,Certainly will blow donor contribution enthusiasm,This will inevitably affect the donation activity itself of existence and development.

亲属间捐献，可否立法规定责任义务 Between relative contributions,Can you legislation duty

　　帅帅不幸离世后，舆论的矛头直指帅帅父亲。相对于其他反悔的捐赠者来说，他的拒捐显得更加“不可原谅”。有人甚至质疑他触犯遗弃罪，要求追究他的法律责任。

Derek unfortunately after from the world,Public opinion were directed at Derek father.Relative to other back for the donors,He refused to donate more"unforgivable".Some have even questioned his beyond the crime of abandonment,Requirements shall be investigated for his legal responsibility.

　　对此，中国政法大学教授何俊萍告诉记者，我国婚姻法和未成年人保护法中均有规定，父母对于未成年子女负有抚养的义务，禁止家庭成员间的遗弃行为。对这起事件来说，帅帅的父母各执一词，个中内情比较复杂，外人对于放弃移植的原因无法判定，因此帅帅的父亲是否构成遗弃目前还难以断定。但是从家庭伦理道德上讲，父母应该对孩子进行积极的、无私的救助和照料。从各种报道中来看，帅帅父亲在治疗后期没有尽到看护的责任，这一点是应该被谴责的。

this,A professor at China university of political HeJunPing told reporters,Our marriage law and the law on the protection of minors are in regulation,The parents to have the obligation of minor child raising,Prohibited between family members left behavior.To this incident is,Derek parents each sticks to his argument,The inside is more complex,A stranger to give up the cause of transplantation unable to determine,Therefore Derek's father is a left is still difficult to judge.But in the family ethics speaking,Parents should undertake to the child positive/Selfless aid and care.From all kinds of report to see,Derek father in the treatment of late haven't done nurse responsibility,It is should be to blame.

　　几年前，山西长治人赵云亮为了救治患肝癌的父亲，瞒着父亲捐出了自己60%的肝脏。此事被传为美谈，赵云亮也被当地评为道德楷模。这样的事例更多体现的是道德层面上的认可，但对于家庭成员间是否有义务进行器官或造血干细胞移植，目前法律上还没有明确规定。

A few years ago,Shanxi changzhi people ZhaoYunLiang for treatment of liver cancer's father,From father donated 60% of his liver.The matter was 传为美谈,ZhaoYunLiang also by local named moral models.This case more reflects the moral level of recognition,But for between family members have the duty to make organs or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation,At present the law also did not make clear a regulation.

　　是否有立法必要？针对这一问题，记者采访了北京市西城区检察院未成年人犯罪案件检察处检察官王媛媛。她认为，从情感上，立法规定父母的捐献义务和责任自然好，但法律保护的是所有公民的合法权益，自然也包括孩子父母的个人权益。“为了保护孩子的利益就要牺牲其父母的个人权益？这似乎并不符合法律精神。如果真要对这一问题立法，必须要经过一个长期、深入的立法调研，在两者的利益方面法律必须作出平衡。”

If there is a necessary legislation?In order to solve this problem,The reporter interviewed the Beijing xicheng district procuratorate minor crime cases in procuratorial WangYuanYuan prosecutors.She thinks,From the emotional,Legislation stipulates parents contribution obligation and liability of nature,But the law to protect all the lawful rights and interests of citizens,Nature also include the child parents' personal rights."In order to protect the interests of the child to sacrifice their parents' personal rights?This does not seem to conform to the legal spirit.If true to this legislation,Must go through a long-term/Further legislation research,In the interests of the law must make balance."

　　中国政法大学刑法学教授邬明安则认为，我国刑法第261条规定：“对于年老、年幼、患病或其他没有独立生活能力的人，负有扶养义务而拒绝扶养，情节恶劣的，处五年以下有期徒刑、拘役或者管制。”这里的“扶养义务”应该作合理的扩大解释，在这种亲属身患重病且凭一己之力能够挽救的情势下，家庭成员有义务提供最大的帮助。将这种力所能及的救助纳入到扶养的范畴之内，才符合立法本意。

China university of politics and law professor WuMingAn punishment law is considered,Prescribed in article 261 of the criminal law in our country:"For old/young/Sick or any other person who cannot live independently,Fulfill his duty and refused to support,If the circumstances are flagrant,Place five years imprisonment/Criminal detention or public surveillance."here"The obligation of supporting the"Should make a reasonable explanation to expand,In this family suffering from serious illness and by on my own can save conditions,Family members have the obligation to provide the greatest help.Will this can rescue into the category of support within,To conform to the legislative intention.

　　“其实，保护身患白血病的患者的最好办法，是加强造血干细胞捐献的相关知识宣传，调动起全社会的力量，不断健全和完善治疗白血病的配套措施。”王媛媛说，“在法律方面，有必要出台规范造血干细胞移植行为的法律法规，对造血干细胞捐献、移植行为的法律性质、法律效力进行规范，对医院、患者、捐赠者的责任进行明确的规定，以免因过分随意而给受捐者造成难以弥补的损失。”(杨波 李钰之)

"In fact,Protection of patients suffering from leukemia the best way,Is to strengthen hemopoietic stem cell donor related knowledge propaganda,To mobilize the whole social strength,Constantly improve and perfect the treatment for leukemia supporting measures."WangYuanYuan said,"In the legal aspects,It is necessary to guidelines to regulate the behavior of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation of laws and regulations,Contributions of hematopoietic stem cells/The legal nature of the action of transplantation/In order to regulate the legal effect,On hospital/patients/The responsibility of the donors are clear rules,To avoid excessive optional and give ShouJuanZhe caused difficult to make up for the loss of."(YangBo LiYu of)