一把手直属专用:01056292228转800   舆论引导:01056292228转802   综合治理:01056292228转805   品牌安全与提升:01056292228转808
您当前的位置:亲稳网 > 中国亲稳 > 亲稳行业 > 医疗卫生 >

即刻使用亲民维稳解决方案!

发掘汇报软件

使用亲民维稳全套解决方案邀请

亲稳发掘汇报系统

打造亲民维稳之格局,以便稳中求进,是每一个基层领导的光荣使命与重要责任!是为官一任,造福一方的不二途径!是守住已有成果的必要前提,是继续前进的必要根基!

医生称工伤“48小时之限”不符合医理--亲稳网络舆情监控室
2012-11-03

  保命还是保工伤待遇,这实在是个残酷抉择。

Life or insurance inductrial injury treatment,It is a cruel choices.

  据《经济参考报》11月2日报道,山东济宁一男子在单位加班时,突发脑出血身亡。由于在医院抢救超过48小时,因此不能视同工伤。这起案例引发了网民及法律界的极大关注,并对工伤认定“48小时之限”进行了热烈讨论。

According to[Economic reference to]On November 2, reported,Shandong jining a man in the unit work overtime,Sudden cerebral hemorrhage died.Because in hospital more than 48 hours,Therefore cannot be regarded as inductrial injury.The case sparked netizens and the profession's great attention,And the ascertainment of a work-related injury"48 hours limit"Had a heated discussion.

  工伤设定“48小时之限”,抢救时间超过48小时不能被认定为视同工伤,站在医学角度看,很不合理。

Inductrial injury set"48 hours limit",Save time more than 48 hours cannot be regarded as shall be regarded as inductrial injury,Standing in the medical point of view,Is not reasonable.

  因为不同的疾病有着不同的特点和规律,一般而言,心血管疾病容易致人猝死,会出现“在工作时间和工作岗位,突发疾病死亡”的情况。但脑血管疾病(脑出血便是其中之一)却不大容易致人猝死,其最危险的时候往往是发病后的72小时前后,对于这类病人以48小时作为一个其病情程度的判断节点,显然是不合适的。

Because different disease have different characteristics and laws,Generally speaking,Cardiovascular disease easily cause sudden death,Will appear"In work time and work,Sudden disease death"situation.But cerebrovascular disease(Cerebral hemorrhage is one of them)But not easy to cause sudden death,The most dangerous time is often disease before and after the 72 hours after,For such patients to 48 hours as a its illness degree of judgment node,Obviously is not appropriate.

  而且,一个人在患病后,是不是48小时内死亡,除了和自己的疾病有关外,还和很多外部因素有关,如送往抢救的时机,当值医院以及医生的技术水平,相关人员的抢救态度等,在存在诸多变量的情况下,单单将一个48小时作为严格的标准,实在缺乏说服力。

and,A man in the sick,If death within 48 hours,In addition to and their diseases outside,And many external factors,If taken to save time,The hospital and the doctor's technical level,Relevant personnel of the rescue attitude,There are many variables in the case,Just put a 48 hours as a strict standards,Is the lack of convincing.

  此外,随着医学的发展,死亡的过程也在发生变化,特别是很多生命支持手段的应用,常常会令一些病人的死亡时间明显延后,轻易突破48小时的时间限定,但这能成为认定员工的疾病不够“重”,因此不够“工伤”的理由吗?

In addition,With the development of medical science,The process of death also is in produce change,Especially the application of many life support means,Often can make some patients significantly delayed the time of death,Easily break through 48 hours time limit,But this can be recognized staff's disease is not enough"heavy",So not enough"Inductrial injury"Reason??

  除了在医理上“48小时”的限定不尽合理外,于人情上,这样的规定也实在难令人接受。这样的规定,很可能逼迫一些家庭在员工刚开始抢救的同时,就需要面对应该积极抢救还是尽快放弃的残酷抉择。

In addition to the principles of medical science"48 hours"The limited not reasonable,In the human,Such regulation also true difficult acceptable.The provisions of this,Probably persecuted some families in staff started rescue at the same time,Will need to face should be actively rescue as soon as possible to give up or cruel choices.

  员工是企业的财富,不管是什么原因,当一个员工在自己的工作岗位上发病了,都应该认为这个员工对工作尽了责。死亡对于个人和家庭已是不幸,还要压迫在48小时内死亡才给工伤待遇,这无疑就是一种苛刻了。

The staff is enterprise's wealth,No matter what reason be,When an employee in their work become ill,Should think the staff to work all the responsibility.Death for personal and family is unfortunate,And oppression in 48 hours before death to inductrial injury treatment,This undoubtedly is a kind of hard.

  □郑山海(医生)

- zheng mountain(The doctor)



亲稳链接:链接亲民维稳,践行稳中求进!