因为发表“三聚氰胺无毒”言论，北京大学公共卫生学院教授李可基被炮轰。目前，事件以他道歉收场，但专家在食品安全评估中该扮演怎样角色的话题，引发社会强烈关注—— Because published"Melamine non-toxic"speech,Beijing university professor with the school of public health LiKeJi grins.At present,Event to apologize end,But experts in food safety assessment of how the play the role of the topic,Trigger social strong concern --

吃得放心，专家说法是否信得过？ Eat the rest assured,Expert view is trustworthy?

　　面对一起起食品安全事故，各类专家纷纷评点，甚至意见截然相反，难免有专家为企业代言乃至为利益代言，作出有失公允的评价，误导公众。那么，谁能给出一个中立的、准确的、科学的、权威的结论？专家在食品安全事故评估中究竟应当扮演什么角色？12月8日，在中央财经大学和美国耶鲁大学中国法律中心联合举办的“食品安全法中美研讨会”上，与会人员就相关问题进行了深入探讨。

In the face of YiQiQi food safety accidents,Various specialists are commented,Even opposite opinions,There is bound to be experts for enterprise endorsement and speak for interests,To be fair evaluation,Misleading the public.so,Who can give a neutral/accurate/scientific/Authoritative conclusion?Experts in food safety accident assessment of what role should be what?On August 12,In the central university of finance and economics and Yale university Chinese law center, jointly organized"China and the United States food safety seminar"on,The researchers related problem is discussed.

塑化剂风波，“专家”遭炮轰 Plasticizer storm,"experts"Was cannon

　　继苏丹红、三聚氰胺、瘦肉精之后，陌生的化学品名词塑化剂在2012年底再次进入公众视野。中国白酒塑化剂事件的曝光，令以上千年酒文明著称的中国酒业面临前所未有的信誉危机，也让食品安全问题再次成为关注焦点。

The Sudan red/melamine/Lean lean fine after,Strange chemical noun plasticizing agent at the end of 2012 is again in the public view.Chinese liquor plasticizer event exposure,More than one thousand years civilization that wine is famous for its Chinese wine industry face unprecedented credit crisis,Also let food safety problem has once again become the focus.

　　“作为权威机构，卫生部国家食品安全风险评估中心始终没有作出正式回应，应当追责。”北京大学法学院教授沈岿说。

"As the authority,The ministry of health the national food safety risk assessment center has not formally respond to,Responsibility shall be after."Beijing university law school professor ShenKui said.

　　前不久，酒鬼酒塑化剂事件发生后，消费者首先看到的是非权威机构出具的塑化剂超标260%的报告。紧接着，你方唱罢我登场，“非人为添加说”、“行业潜规则说”、“对外隐瞒说”、“股价阴谋说”等纷纷亮相，但在真相澄清的黄金时间里，消费者始终没有得到可信服的专家意见。

Not long ago,Drunkard wine plasticizing agent after the incident,Consumers first see is issued by the authority plasticizing agent exceed 260% of the report.then,You will sing me my debut,"Non-artificial add said"/"Industry latent rule says"/"Foreign hide said"/"Share price conspiracy said"Appear in succession,But in truth clarification of gold in time,Consumers are not always can be convincing expert advice.

　　12月9日晚，网友“水晶皇”在博客上公布了53度飞天茅台香港送检的检测结果，茅台酒检出塑化剂含量3.3“g/L，这个数据比中国酒业协会此前引用的国家标准高了120%。报告甫一出，立即引起轩然大波。

On December 9,,Net friend"Crystal huang"In the blog published the 53 degrees flying maotai Hong Kong inspection test results,Maotai detection plasticizing agent content of 3.3"G/L,This data than the Chinese wine industry association previously quoted national standards high 120%.The report just a,Immediately caused a sensation.

　　12月12日，茅台酒官方在贵阳召开媒体见面会，回应各方质疑。北京大学卫生学院教授李可基在会上称，塑化剂的影响并没有在人身上得到验证，塑化剂是相对安全的物质。李可基还表示，三聚氰胺基本是无毒的物质，成人继续喝下去不会损害人体。他解释的理由是，人类几百万年都没有灭绝，说明人类的排毒、解毒能力实际上是非常强大的。过去一百多年间，各种各样的有毒有害物质，如铅、砷、汞、二恶英等等这些物质都是几十倍、上百倍地在增加，但人的寿命在过去一百多年中也增加了一倍。“所以各种有毒有害的物质我们基本上都应付掉了。”

On December 12,,Maotai official press conference held in guiyang,Respond to all questions.Peking University health LiKeJi professor at the meeting said,Plasticizer influence on man and not verified,Plasticizer is relatively safe material.LiKeJi also said,Melamine basic is non-toxic material,Adult continue to drink it won't harm the human body.He explained the reason is,Human millions of years are not destroyed,That human discharge poison/Jiedu ability is actually very powerful.Over the past one hundred years,All kinds of poisonous and harmful material,Such as lead/arsenic/mercury/Dioxin and so on these matter is dozens of times/One hundred times on the increase,But the life of the people in the past one hundred years also doubled."So all kinds of poisonous and harmful material we basically all deal with off."

　　李可基的观点经媒体报道后立刻遭到炮轰，其为何登上茅台酒新闻发布会、有无收取代言费也被公众质疑。几天后，李再次面对媒体向公众道歉，但表示这些观点都是基于对相关政策的了解和自身的科学水平，“我仍然坚持自己的观点”。

LiKeJi point of view the media immediately after being cannon,They are the maotai press conference/Without charge endorsements was also questioned the public.After a few days,Lee again in the face of the media to the public apology,But said these views are based on relevant policies and their own understanding of the scientific level,"I still hold to my point of view".

　　对于专家的道歉，有人表示，“我不理解，为什么一有企业出现食品安全事件，总有专家能站出来替他们解围，他们是在为科学代言还是在为利益代言？”

For expert apology,Someone said,"I don't understand,Why a enterprise appear food safety events,There is always the experts can stand up for them to clear,They are in for science or speak for interests endorsement?"

　　白酒塑化剂危害到底有多大？目前，仍然没有权威说法，公众的这一困惑将持续多久？

Liquor plasticizing agent how much harm?At present,There is still no authoritative statement,The public this confusion will last long?