“烟草院士”现身工程院官网再引争议，有人提出质疑新证据—— "Tobacco academician"Appeared academy of engineering's official website to cause the dispute,Someone questioned new evidence --

　　“国际上已证实降焦不等于减害”(热点解读) "International has confirmed that drop coke is not equal to reduce harm"(Hot reading)

　　核心阅读 Core reading

　　近日，广受质疑的“烟草院士”谢剑平的名字出现在中国工程院官方网站，再引争议。

recently,Is widely questioned"Tobacco academician"XieJianPing name appeared in the Chinese academy of engineering's official website,To cause the dispute.

　　1月15日，中国医学科学院基础医学研究所和新探健康发展研究中心联合举办研讨会，与会者认为“减害降焦”研究误导公众，并称国际上已证实“降焦减害”是骗局。

On January 15,,Chinese academy of medical sciences institute of basic medicine and new research centre for health development joint seminar,Participants believed that"Harm reduction of reducing tar"Research of misleading the public,Said the international has confirmed"Drop focus on reducing"Is fraud.

　　15日，记者在中国工程院官网上看到，在“走近院士”栏目中，谢剑平位列43位“环境与轻纺工程学部”院士名单中，并称“2011年当选中国工程院院士”。

15,Reporters in the Chinese academy of engineering official website to see,in"Approached academician"Column of,XieJianPing was 43"Environment and textile engineering division"Academician list,said"In 2011 was elected member of Chinese academy of engineering".

　　在15日召开的研讨会上，多位专家提出质疑“烟草院士”的新证据，并认为其研究成果为烟草业利益服务，刻意隐瞒吸烟导致的危害，其所行所言不符合“提倡科学精神，维护科学道德”的院士义务。

In the 15 a seminar,Many experts questioned"Tobacco academician"New evidence,And that the results of the tobacco industry interests service,Deliberately hide about the dangerous of tobacco,The line is not in conformity with the said"Advocate the spirit of science,Maintenance scientific moral"Academician of the obligation.

　　烟草专家当选中国工程院院士，遭受多方质疑 Tobacco experts elected member of Chinese academy of engineering,Suffered many question

　　2011年12月，郑州烟草研究院副院长谢剑平被列入中国工程院增选院士名单，引发控烟人士、公共卫生界乃至卫生部和世界卫生组织的广泛质疑。2012年5月，中国工程院4个学部近百位院士联名致函工程院主席团，请求尽快复议，重审烟草专家谢剑平当选工程院院士的资格。

In December of 2011,Zhengzhou tobacco research institute, vice President of the Chinese academy of engineering XieJianPing was included in the list of add choose,Cause smoke control people/Public WeiShengJie and the ministry of health and the world health organization's widely questioned.In May 2012,The Chinese academy of engineering four divisions of nearly a joint letter to the presidium of the academy of engineering,Reconsideration request as soon as possible,Review tobacco experts XieJianPing elected academy of engineering qualifications.

　　中国工程院院士秦伯益是当时联名的院士之一，他认为，谢剑平违背了科学道德、国家法规和社会伦理。秦伯益曾在一个会议上当面问谢剑平：“人用3天的产品，(临床实验)要做一个月的时间，人用一个月的产品，要做终生的实验，你做什么了？”谢剑平没有回答。

Chinese academy of engineering QinBoYi was one of the member of the joint,He thinks,XieJianPing against the scientific moral/National laws, regulations and social ethics.QinBoYi was in a meeting face to face XieJianPing asked:"People use 3 days of the product,(Clinical trials)To do a month's time,People use a month of products,To do a lifetime experiment,What did you do?"XieJianPing didn't answer.

　　中国工程院院士陈君石说，谢剑平的成果在科学上是站不住脚的，而且还有欺骗性，要对他所获得的几项国家科技进步奖进行分析。

Chinese academy of engineering ChenJunShi said,XieJianPing results in science is untenable,And there are deceptive,For he received several national progress prize in science and technology to carry on the analysis.

　　中国工程院院士王陇德说，去年两会期间，工程院领导曾找他谈话，说第一谢剑平没有作假，第二工程院评审程序是完整的，没有违反评审程序，所以不能取消。

Chinese academy of engineering WangLongDe said,During the last two,Academy of engineering leadership was looking for him to talk,Said the first XieJianPing not false,The second academy of engineering review process is complete,Did not violate the review process,So cannot cancel the.

　　然而，王陇德却对谢剑平院士的评审程序提出质疑。他说，把一个对人健康有害的研究成果放到了环境轻纺学部，这就是评审程序上的一个严重错误。他建议科技部和中国工程院反省科技奖的评审和院士评审工作的相关规定，尽快提出对谢剑平科技进步奖和他院士资格的重新复议。

however,WangLongDe but XieJianPing academician of the process of questioning.He said,Put a to be harmful to human health research results on the environment light textile divisions,This is the process of a serious mistake.He suggested that ministry of science and technology and the Chinese academy of engineering () reflect the review and evaluation of the relevant provisions of the work,Put forward as soon as possible to XieJianPing progress prize in science and technology and his qualification of the member to review.

　　中国疾控中心控烟办原主任杨功焕说，关于谢剑平院士资格的争议，并非简单的学术水平高下之争，而是关系到科学方向、科学伦理，是控烟和反控烟之争，要烟草还是要健康之争，是要履行《烟草控制框架公约》还是要违背公约原则之争。

The Chinese CDC smoke control to do original director YangGongHuan said,About XieJianPing qualification of the dispute,Is simply not the academic level of the struggle against,But related to scientific direction/Scientific ethics,Is smoking and tobacco control against the struggle,To tobacco or health rivalry,Is to perform[The framework convention on tobacco control]Or to go against convention for the principle.