近来不断出现的幼女被性侵案件，大多被定性为“嫖宿幼女”。嫖宿幼女罪是否应该废除引发讨论。中国政法大学刑法学教授阮齐林称，“嫖宿幼女刑罚过轻”是个伪命题，“司法实践中，99%的嫖宿幼女罪判得比强奸罪重。”(7月20日《中国青年报》)

Recent appear constantly maidens were the sex abuse cases，Mostly by qualitative for“whoring”。Whoring is discussed by sin should be abolished。China university of politics and law of punishment law professor RuanJiLin says，“Whoring is too light punishment”Is a false statement，“Judicial practice，99% of whoring to sin than rape heavy。”(July 20,《China youth daily》)

　　与不满14周岁的幼女发生性行为，最为明显的特征和最不得人心之处在于，14周岁以下的幼女，并不具备“性同意能力”，甚至有的较小的幼女，连最起码的性认识都没有。而所谓的“嫖宿”，则明显带有性交易的意思。其至少有两个构成要素，即一是被“嫖宿”者主观愿意，二是双方之间存在给付财物事实，俗称“给钱”。

The age of 14 and discontent pet of sex，The most obvious of the characteristics and the most unpopular in the，The girl under the age of 14，Don't have“Sex agree with ability”，Even some of the smaller girl，Even at the very least, sexual know all have no。The so-called“whoring”，Is marked with a sex trade mean。Its has at least two elements，Namely is a“whoring”Subjective to the，2 is there between the two pay property facts，Commonly known as“Give money”。

　　很明显，“与不满14周岁的幼女发生性行为”这一行为中，幼女并不具备答应被“嫖宿”的资格，也不具备财物与发生性行为之间关系的判别能力。基于此，所谓的“嫖宿幼女罪”首先从法律根本和基础上，就有了保护幼女不力的嫌疑。它假定了并不具备同意能力的幼女已经同意性行为的前提，是一个建立在假设基础上的罪名。

obviously，“The age of 14 and discontent pet of sex”This behavior，Girl did not have promised to be“whoring”qualifications，Also do not have property and sex of the relationship between the discrimination ability。Based on this，The so-called“Whoring sin”First from the legal basic and basis，Have the protection of the poor girl suspicion。It is assumed that the does not have agreed to ability maidens have agreed to sexual behavior of premise，Is an establishment in based on the assumption of crime。

　　或许，“司法实践中，99%的嫖宿幼女罪判得比强奸罪重”确实是一个事实，但这并不能成为“嫖宿幼女罪”冠冕堂皇地存在的理由，更不能成为其存在的辩护词。这其间的区别也很明显：强奸罪一般侵犯的对象是成年人；而嫖宿幼女罪的侵犯对象则无一例外是幼女。一边是与成年人发生性关系，一边是与幼女发生性关系，这其间根本就没有可比性，又何来“99%判得比强奸重”一说？

perhaps，“Judicial practice，99% of whoring to sin than rape heavy”Really is a fact，But it can't be“Whoring sin”Impressive-looking to reason to exist，More can't become its existence defense。In the meantime difference is obvious：Rape of the object is adults general infringement；And the sin of whoring infringement is without exception object is's infant daughter。On one side is having sex with adults，On one side is having sex with the girl，In the meantime no comparable，And there can be no“99% sentenced to better than rape heavy”said？

　　事实上，民众所质疑的，是“嫖宿幼女罪”这个罪名，以及其普遍较低的量刑。如果硬拿对象是幼女的“嫖宿幼女罪”的量刑与对象是成人的强奸罪相比，显然有偷换概念、误导人们的法律认识之嫌。

In fact，People in question，is“Whoring sin”The charges，And it is generally low of sentencing。If the object is hard and's infant daughter“Whoring sin”Sentencing and object is adult than rape，There is clearly tick the concept、Mislead people legal know too。

　　为了保护未成年人，体现法律的尊严与威慑力，“与不满14周岁的幼女发生性行为”应统一视为强奸。至于在罪名上，为了与普通的发生在成人之间的强奸犯罪有所区别，不妨统一归于“强奸幼女罪”，然后参照强奸罪量刑标准从重、从严惩罚。

In order to protect minors，Reflect the dignity of law and deterrence，“The age of 14 and discontent pet of sex”Should be unified as rape。As for in charges，In order to and ordinary happened in adult rape crime between different，Might as well be unified“Rape removal sin”，And then the sentencing of the standard reference to rape a heavier、Severely punish。

　　(刘 鹏)

(Liu peng)