N秦淮川

N beside qinhuai sichuan

　　今日人物：方舟子

Today's figures：fang

　　上榜理由：他炮轰厦大教授傅瑾博士文凭造假，目前傅瑾被校方辞退

List reasons：He FuJin at xiamen university professor dr under false diploma，At present FuJin was the school dismissal

　　近日，厦门大学医学院教授傅瑾被方舟子炮轰，指其哥伦比亚大学博士文凭造假。7月25日，厦大公布调查结果，称傅瑾应聘厦大提供的是一份“完全假的”哥伦比亚大学博士文凭。傅瑾本人已承认造假行为，厦大对她作出辞退处理，并坦承自己工作失误，表示歉意。（7月26日人民网）

recently，Xiamen university medical school professor fang shelling FuJin was，Refers to the Columbia University diploma of dr. False。July 25,，Xiamen university announced the results of the survey，Apply for FuJin says offer is a at xiamen university“Completely false”Dr. Columbia University diploma。FuJin I have admitted frauds，For her to resign treatment at xiamen university，And admitted his mistakes in the work，apology。（July 26, people net）

　　应该说，厦大处理果断，不留情面地立马辞退造假教授，同时向公众道歉。动作迅速，不掩盖丑闻，相比某些高校遭遇学者造假时态度暧昧，敷衍搪塞，可谓天壤之别。

Should say，Xiamen university processing decisive，Myself immediately to dismiss fraud professor，Simultaneous public apology。Action quick，Don't cover up the scandal，Some scholars fraud in college than attitude when ambiguous，Perfunctory prevarication，Difference is。

　　不过，在赞赏厦大的“危机公关”之余，有些问题还值得进一步反思。傅瑾的博士文凭“完全是假的”，为何等到方舟子出手才被揭穿？一个没什么技术含量的造假，居然蒙混过关这么长时间，太让人不安了。对傅瑾的造假，证伪并不难，只要让她提供所谓的博士文凭原件，或检索她所谓的博士论文，想必就可查出原形。遗憾的是，8年时间里，校方都没有求证高校学术甄别与审查机制可谓漏洞多多。

but，In praise of xiamen university“Crisis public relations”More than the，Some problem is worth further reflection。FuJin Ph.D certificate“Is totally false”，Why wait until it is exposed shots？A no technical content of fraud，Incredibly smooth it so long，So to the unrest。To FuJin damage，Card false is not difficult，Just let her so-called Ph.D certificate provided the original，Or retrieval what she called a PhD thesis，Presumably you can find out prototype。unfortunately，Eight years，The school is no verification university discrimination and review mechanism is many loopholes。

　　方舟子学术打假的成功率极高，一个个学者被弄得灰头土脸，究其原因不外乎两点，一是造假者多，造假行为没什么技术含量；二是方舟子证伪的逻辑链经得起推敲。可方舟子再厉害，终究是“一个人在战斗”，如果相关部门和高校“守土有责”，甄别机制高效发挥作用，还需要他出手吗？

Fang academic dozen false success rate is extremely high，A scholar get dusty，Investigate its reason is nothing more than two points，One is how fraudsters，No technical content frauds；2 it is false logic chains fang card withstand scrutiny。But how much again，Eventually is“A man in the battle”，If the relevant departments and university“ShouTu duty”，Identify mechanism efficient work，Need he shot？

　　说到底，学术打假不能依赖“个人英雄主义”，还得靠规章制度发挥作用清理造假土壤，让造假者付出更多的道德成本乃至法律代价，造假者还敢那么猖狂吗？

In the final analysis，Academic dozen false can't depend on“Personal heroism”，Still have to depend on rules work cleaning fraud soil，Let the fraudsters pay more moral cost and even legal cost，Fraudsters still dare so rampant？