郑州遭开除女大学生称“被替考”状告学校 Zhengzhou was fired from the female university students said“Was TiKao”Sued the school

　　

法院一审判决学校撤销处分决定 Court verdict school decided to cancel sanctions

　　郑州航空工业管理学院(以下简称“郑州航院”)教师在期末考试中，现场抓到一男生以一名女生李莉(化名)的名字参加考试。学校遂以“找人替考”为由，将李莉开除学籍。但是，李莉却称，自己在考试时请假在家，根本没有找人替考，是“被替考”了，并将郑州航院诉至法院。

Zhengzhou aviation industry management institute(Hereinafter referred to as“Zhengzhou navigation court”)Teachers in the final exam，The scene caught a boy with a girl lily(aliases)Name for the exam。Depending on the school“For someone to TiKao”for，Lily will be expelled from school。but，Li li has said，Himself in the exam to leave the house，No TiKao for someone，is“Was TiKao”the，And the court of appeal will zhengzhou navigation。

　　近日，郑州市二七区人民法院一审审理认为，学校没有充分证据证明李莉与被抓男生之间存在替考行为，判决撤销郑州航院对李莉的开除学籍处分决定。

recently，Erqi district people's court trial of zhengzhou city that trial，Schools have no sufficient evidence to prove lily and caught between boys TiKao behavior，Decision to revoke the zhengzhou navigation of lily expelled from school to sanctions。

　　

女大学生：“被替考”是有人故意报复 Female college students：“Was TiKao”Is someone deliberately revenge

　　今年22岁的李莉，2006年9月考入郑州航院法律系。2007年6月因在校内参加体育活动时摔伤需要长期康复治疗，就休学了一段时间。

This year, at the age of 22, lily，In September 2006 the school of law, admitted to zhengzhou navigation。In June 2007 in the school sports activities because when need long-term rehabilitation fall，Just out of school for a short time。

　　2011年12月下旬，读大四的李莉因找工作回到老家周口市。春节假期后返校的李莉接到了学校的一纸开除学籍处罚决定。郑州航院以李莉于2011年12月29日上午参加《马克思主义基本原理概论》考试时找他人替考为由，给予她开除学籍处分。

In late December of 2011，Read a senior job back to hometown for lily zhoukou city。After the Spring Festival holiday school lily of school received paper expelled the penalty decision。Zhengzhou air courtyard to lily on December 29, 2011 in the morning《An introduction to the basic principle of marxism》When the exam find another person TiKao grounds，Give her expelled disciplinary action。

　　李莉认为，按学校规定，参加考试必须携带身份证、准考证，经过监考老师认真审查核对无异议后方可进入考场。可她在《马克思主义基本原理概论》考试前已回老家周口市，本人的身份证、准考证也是随身携带，不可能由他人代替考试。

Li li think，According to the regulation of the school，For the exam must carry identity CARDS、Your admission ticket，After the supervisor carefully check without objection rear can into the examination room。But she in《An introduction to the basic principle of marxism》Before the exam, already back to zhoukou city，His id card、Your admission ticket and carry，Can't replace by other test。

　　郑州市二七区人民法院经审理确认这样的事实：2011年12月29日上午，在郑州航院组织的《马克思主义基本原理概论》考试中，一名自称叫“王帅”的男生持名为“李莉”的学生证以“李莉”的名字到该校参加该科考试。监考老师发现后当即报告了学校。当日，“王帅”出具一份说明，内容为“我由同学介绍，到此校考试，考生李莉”。学校即以李莉有由他人代替考试行为为由，于2011年12月30日向李莉家人送达《郑州航院学生违规处理告知书》。

Erqi district people's court trial of zhengzhou city by the confirmation to the fact：December 29, 2011 morning，In the organization of zhengzhou navigation《An introduction to the basic principle of marxism》Examination of，A purported that“WangShuai”The boy called“lily”Student to“lily”Name to the school to the exam。The supervisor immediately after the school report found。On that day，“WangShuai”Issue a description，Content for the“I introduced by students，To this school examination，Examinee lily”。The school is to LiLiYou replace by other examination on the behavior，On December 30, 2011 to the lily family delivered《Zhengzhou air courtyard students illegal processing told book》。

　　2012年1月5日，学校召开院长办公会，研究决定给予李莉开除学籍处分，并于1月7日作出《关于给予李莉开除学籍处分的决定》。

Jan. 5, 2012，The school of BanGongHui held，Research decided to give lily expelled disciplinary action，And in January 7 made《About giving lily expelled dispose of the decision》。

　　李莉立即向学校申诉并要求组织听证。3月13日学校院长办公会议研究决定，维持给予原告开除学籍处分的决定，并随后将结果向李莉进行送达。

Li li immediately to the school and asked the organize a hearing。March 13, school dean office conference decision research，To maintain the plaintiff expelled dispose of the decision，And then will the results to lily are delivered。

　　因在校期间与其他同学闹过矛盾，李莉怀疑系有人故意报复，使她遭遇了“被替考”。

Because during the period of school and other students make conflict，Lily is suspected was deliberately revenge，Expose her to the“Was TiKao”。

　　李莉称，学校最终没有组织听证，直接维持了开除学籍的处分。李莉认为学校作出的开除学籍处分的决定，明显认定事实不清，证据不足，且程序严重违法，请求法院判令撤销学校对自己开除学籍处分的决定。

Li li says，The school ultimately no organize a hearing，Maintain the expulsion of direct disciplinary action。Li li think the school to dispose of the expulsion decision，Obvious fact that is not clear，Insufficient evidence，And serious illegal program，Requesting the court to judge to cancel school expelled dispose of the decision。

　　

法院：校方不能证明女大学生与“替考”男生间存在委托关系 The court：The school can't prove with female college students“TiKao”The boy to exist between the principal-agent relationship

　　李莉对校方行为提出一连串质疑：替考人的身份情况是否属实？替考人进入考场携带的是什么证件？怎么证明自己与替考人存在委托代为考试关系？有没有现场监控录像等。

The school puts forward a series of lily behavior question：TiKao of status whether this is true？TiKao people into the examination room can carry what certificate？How to prove himself and TiKao people have entrusted to test the relationship？Have the surveillance video, etc。

　　在审理中，被告郑州航院辩称，替考人明确承认是由同学介绍替李莉考试的，且有替考试卷以及《郑州航院考试违纪情况说明表》相互印证，因此李莉由他人代替考试的证据充分。另外，该院将学校的各种规章制度汇编成《学生手册》，人手一册向新生发放并组织学习，故每个学生对考试作弊的处罚规定都是清楚的。当查明李莉由他人代替考试这一严重考试作弊行为后，学校根据相关规定作出开除学籍的处分决定，依据是充分的。

In the trial，The defendant zhengzhou air courtyard argued，TiKao clearly acknowledged by students who is introduced for lily the exam，And TiKao papers and《Zhengzhou air courtyard exam discipline case table》By each other，So li li replace by other test evidence fully。In addition，The school will be compiled into various rules and regulations《Student handbook》，Beginning to a new release and organizational learning，So each student to cheat in the exam of the punishment of the provisions are clear。When found by others instead of the exam this lily a serious cheating on exams，According to the relevant provisions of the school to the sanctions expulsion decision，Basis was full。

　　对于李莉所说的学校没有组织听证，郑州航院表示，李莉提出申辩后，学校召开院长办公会议，听取了院学生申诉处理委员会对学生违纪听证与处理意见的汇报，决定维持原决定。

For li li says schools did not organize a hearing，Zhengzhou navigation court said，Li li put forward after arguing，The school of meeting held office，Listen to the court of appeal commission students discipline and processing opinion students hearing the report，Decided to maintain the original decision。

　　法院经审理认为，被告提供的证据中自称“王帅”的男生持有的学生证性别为男性，而原告李莉的性别为女性，被告未提供“王帅”的相关身份证明，其提供的“王帅”的照片不能据以认定此人的身份，“王帅”所写的说明亦不能证明其身份，不能证明原告与“王帅”之间存在替考行为。

The court trial think，The evidence of the defendant in claims“WangShuai”The boy held for the male gender student id card，And the plaintiff lily gender for women，The defendant did not provide a“WangShuai”The relevant identification，The offer“WangShuai”Photos of the man's identity which can't recognized，“WangShuai”The show also cannot be written to prove his identity，Can't prove the plaintiff and“WangShuai”TiKao between behavior。

　　法院以此认定，郑州航院认为原告有由他人代替考试的行为证据不足，所作出的开除学籍处分决定缺乏事实依据，遂一审判决撤销郑州航院对李莉开除学籍的处分。

In court that，Zhengzhou navigation court considered the plaintiff is replace by other test behavior insufficient evidence，Expelled from school to the punishment decision unsubstantiated，Hence the decision to revoke the zhengzhou air expelled from school lily of the sanctions。

　　据悉，郑州航院不服一审判决已提出上诉。

It is reported，Zhengzhou navigation court verdict has not appeal。

　　

专家：对学校管理提出新挑战 experts：Put new challenges for school management

　　从事行政法研究的河南政法干部管理学院副教授马明华认为，在该案中，学校的管理权和学生的受教育权发生了冲突，当学校行使管理权，对学生作出不利处分时，应当遵循正当程序原则。

Engaged in the study of politics and law of administrative cadre management associate professor at college of henan MaMingHua think，In the case of，The management of the school and students' right to education clashed，When school exercise of power，To the student make the adverse actions，Shall follow the principle of due process。

　　“如果程序正当，学校是听取了学生的申辩后才作出了处罚决定，则并无太大问题。”马明华说，但关于李莉是否有作弊行为的认定上，还需校方拿出更有说服力的证据。

“If the program as，The school is to listen to the students to make the penalty after court decision，It do not have too big problems。”MaMingHua said，But about lily cheated if that，Still need to take out the more persuasive evidence。

　　郑州大学法学院教授宋四辈说，近年来，教育部先后颁布了《普通高等学校学生管理规定》和《国家教育考试违规处理办法》两部法规，让学校对作弊的处罚有法可依。可是，法律不能解决所有问题，比如《国家教育考试违规处理办法》中虽然明确规定了考生哪些行为属于考试违规，哪些行为属于考试作弊，却没有详细规定需要怎样的证据和程序来进行认定，这就给学校的管理制度提出了新挑战。

Zhengzhou university law school professor song four generation said，In recent years，The ministry of education issued《Common higher school students management regulations》and《National education examination illegal processing method》Two regulations，Let the school to cheat on the barriers of punishment。but，The law can't solve all problems，For example《National education examination illegal processing method》Although clearly define the examinee which belongs to the exam illegal behavior，What activities to be cheating in the exam，But no detailed regulations need to evidence and process to maintain，This will give the school management system puts forward new challenges。

　　“有些学校为严格考试纪律，对考试作弊‘零容忍’，一旦发现作弊就处以‘极刑’，直接取消学位、开除学籍。”宋四辈说，“极刑”处罚对学生的受教育权有非常严重的影响，应该非常慎重，不仅必须遵守权限、条件、时限要求和遵循告知、送达等正当程序，还要充分尊重学生申诉的权利。

“Some schools for strict examination discipline，Cheating on exams‘Zero tolerance’，Once found cheating will impose‘Capital punishment’，Directly cancel degree、expelled。”Song four generation said，“Capital punishment”The right to education for students punishment have very serious effect，Should be very careful，Not only must abide by the authority、conditions、Time limits and follow told、To due process, etc，To fully respect the rights of the students。

　　“学生状告学校的案件虽然诉讼的内容各不相同，但基本上可以归纳为学生对学校管理制度的质疑。学校的规章制度如何贯彻，国家的法律如何细化，实际中怎样去具体实施，是学校管理中应该多多思考的问题，这样或许可以减少此类案件的发生。”宋四辈说。(记者 韩俊杰 通讯员 辛爽 张玉甫)

“The case of the school students sued the content of the lawsuit although each are not identical，But basically can be concluded to students in the school management system to the question。How to implement the rules and regulations of the school，The legislation of the country of refined how，Practice how to specific implementation，Is the school management should look to thinking of problem，That might reduce such cases。”Song four generation said。(Reporter HanJunJie correspondent XinShuang ZhangYuFu)