作为全国首批重点大学，复旦大学享有很高声誉，8月16日，有外地行人在复旦大学门口前拍照留念。

As the first batch of national key university，Fudan university enjoys a high reputation，On August 16,，Have foreign pedestrian in fudan university, before the door of pictures。

　　

认为连续三年在职称评审中遭受不公正对待 Think three years in a row in the title appraisal from injustice

　　

复旦副教授状告母校讨职称 Fudan associate professor sued Alma mater for the title

　　1992年，陈云以优异成绩从复旦大学国际政治系本科毕业、并直升为本校研究生继续深造时，肯定不会想到，二十年后自己会将“有着特殊感情”的母校，告上法庭。

In 1992,，Chen yun with excellent grades from fudan university international department of political science undergraduate course graduation、And for the helicopter graduate students to further my study in，Won't think of，Twenty years later his will“Has special feelings”Alma mater，court。

　　今年7月，已经在复旦大学任职副教授十年的陈云，认定自己在连续三次的教授职称评审中遭遇了不公正的待遇，并且涉及严重的人事腐败。此前她向学校申请公开同时申报者的材料等信息，复旦大学答复称，已经还给了申报者，拒绝公开。于是，一纸诉状将她和母校对立在了原告和被告席上。

July，Have been in fudan university associate professor in ten years of Chen yun，That you are three consecutive professor title appraisal by the unjust treatment，And involves serious personnel corruption。After her to the school for application for public and declarer materials information，Fudan university reply said，Has returned to the declarer，Refuses to open。so，A paper complaint will be she and Alma mater opposition in the plaintiff and the dock。

　　

突兀增加的选票 Abrupt increase of the vote

　　这是一个历时五年的冗长故事。对于这其中的点滴细节，留着短发、干练的陈云记忆深刻，她用颇快的语速将一切倾诉。

This is a long story over the past five years。For the drop details，Have short hair、Capable of Chen yun deep memory，She used a quick speed will pour out all。

　　2001年9月，在日本广岛大学获得博士学位的陈云申请回母校复旦大学工作，并于2002年2月回复旦任教。同年12月，她顺利晋升为副教授。谈及那段经历，陈云感慨良多，她说自己留学之前，就规划着早日回国。“申请回复旦，毕竟是我的母校，有着特殊的情感。”

In September of 2001，On the Japanese city of Hiroshima and a doctorate from the university of Chen yun applied to return to his Alma mater fudan university work，And in February 2002 at fudan back。In December，She successfully promoted to associate professor。About that experience，Chen yun feeling a lot，She said she before study，Is planning a home as soon as possible。“Applied to return to fudan，After all my Alma mater，Has a special emotion。”

　　波折始于2008年。已经任职副教授多年的陈云，第一次申请正教授职称折戟。事后她才知道，在资格预审环节，她遭受了双重标准。有人的学术成果在申报时并未出版，以“期货”的形式申报成果并通过了，而她却被告知，必须是“正式出版物”。“那是第一次遭遇不公平，当时真的没有多想，也没有太在意。但没有想到后来这种不公会愈演愈烈。”五年后，陈云感慨道。

Twists and turns began in 2008。For many years has been an associate professor of Chen yun，For the first time is professor title folding halberd。Afterwards she didn't know，In the prequalification link，She suffered a double standard。Someone's academic achievements in the declaration by not published，to“futures”Declaration in the form of results and passed，While she was told，Must be“Official publications”。“It is the first time undergo unfair，At that time really don't want to think more，Also does not have the too care about。But no thought of later this conference intensified。”Five years later，Chen yun regrets way。

　　2009年下半年，陈云再次提出正教授职称申请。2010年1月22日，她所任职的复旦大学国际关系与公共事务学院按照惯例召开了教授会，进行了首轮资格预审投票。几天后陈云得知，她没有通过此次的资格评定。

The second half of 2009，Chen yun was put forward again professor title application。On January 22, 2010，She in fudan university international relations and public affairs college by convention held the professor will，The first prequalification vote。A few days later learned that Chen yun，She didn't pass the qualification assessment。

　　“我事后逐一给所有教授打了电话，询问当时的投票程序。在学院拥有投票权的22名教授中，当天17人出席，5名教授因故缺席。沟通中，好几个教授都告知我得了11票。”陈云介绍说。

“I later by professor to all had a phone call，Ask the voting procedure。In the college can vote in 22 professors，The day 17 people attend，5 for professor absent。communication，Several professors are told that I had 11 ticket。”Chen yun said。

　　按照规定，得票超过2/3者可过关通过资格预审。几天后，陈云向学院提出了自己的质疑：即17票的2/3应该是11.3票，按照四舍五入，基点票数应为11票，自己可以通过预审。

According to the regulation，More than two-thirds of the votes can be pass through the prequalification。After a few days，Chen yun to college puts forward his own question：That two-thirds of 17 ticket should be 11.3 ticket，According to rounding off，Base votes should be 11 ticket，You can through the trial。

　　她的质疑并未使结果更改。“我对这样的结果十分讶异，因为我2008年度申报时就通过了资格预审，2009年度的申报成果增加了，却为何连资格都没有了？”带着这种疑问，她要求申诉。

Her question did not make the change。“I to such result is very surprised，Because I 2008 annual declaration when he passed the prequalification，2009 annual reporting results increased，But why even qualification all have no？”With this question，She asked the。

　　事情并未在纠缠中止步，很快她有了新的发现。陈云告诉记者，在继续向学院领导反映过程中，她从其任教学院的党总支书记沈兰芳那了解到，当天实际共有18人投票，其中一名是“委托投票”。按照18票计算，陈云所获得的11票便不及2/3的过关标准。在今年三月底，复旦大学信息公开办公室答复陈云的信息公开请求时，也明确答复“2009年度参加教授会的教授人数为18人，其中委托投票一人。”同时回复给陈云的一份手书的“委托书”中，委托内容为“因本人另外有事不能参加本院的高级职务资格评审会议，委托沈兰芳老师投票”，落款樊勇明，时间是2010年1月20日。

Things did not in the entanglement of walking，Soon she had the new findings。Chen yun told reporters，In the continue to reflect college leadership in the process，She taught from the institute of general party branch secretary ShenLanFang that to know，The actual there are 18 people vote，One of them is“A proxy vote”。According to the 18 ticket calculation，Chen yun received 11 ticket was less than two-thirds of the pass standard。In march this year，Fudan university information public office reply Chen yun thought of public information request，Also a definite reply“2009 year to professor will professor number 18 people，A proxy vote of a man。”At the same time back to Chen yun thought of a calligraphy“Power of attorney”in，Entrust content for the“Because I am also have something can't attend our senior position qualification review meeting，Entrust ShenLanFang teacher vote”，Badging FanYongMing，Time is on January 20, 2010。

　　陈云说，出现了这个突兀的第18票后，她就此问题一直找学院领导、人事处甚至校领导反映，但依旧无果。事实上，对于这个突然产生的18票，也让一些参加了投票的教授心生疑惑。当天就在投票现场的浦兴祖教授在接受采访时曾表示：“我记得很清楚，没有听到任何人提到过委托投票的事情。当时宣布的时候也只说总票数是17票，陈云得了11票。”“事实上，根据相关法规，高级职称评审各个环节，都禁止委托投票，所以，即使暂时撇开第18票的真实性，这张突然出现的‘委托投票’也是非法的。”向记者还原了那段曲折后，陈云已是口干舌燥。

Chen yun said，Have this abrupt 18th after ticket，Her question has been looking for college leadership、The personnel department and even the school leader reflect，But still ended。In fact，For this sudden 18 ticket，Also let some took part in the vote professor mind doubt。The vote in the PuXingZu professor had said in an interview：“I remember very clearly，Did not hear anyone mentioned a proxy vote things。At the time when the only announced also said the total number is 17 ticket，Chen yun was 11 ticket。”“In fact，According to relevant regulations，Senior title appraisal each link，A proxy vote is prohibited，so，Even temporarily put aside the 18th the authenticity of the ticket，This piece of suddenly appear‘A proxy vote’Is illegal。”The reduction to reporters after that twists and turns，Chen yun is thirsty。

　　8月18日，本报记者分别向投票委托人樊勇明和被委托人沈兰芳求证了解此事，但二人均拒绝接受采访。

August 18,，Our reporter to vote respectively FanYongMing client and the client ShenLanFang verification know about the matter，But two per capita refused to accept an interview。

　　

外审评议风波 Outside careful evaluation storm

　　感觉连续两年遭受了不公正待遇，陈云觉得“憋屈”。尽管如此，她选择了忍耐甚至包括父母在内的至亲，她都没有告知诉说。

Feeling for two years suffered unfair treatment，Chen yun think“humbled”。Even so，She chose to patience even include parents' close relative，She didn't tell told。

　　时移世易，转眼到了又一年的教授职称评选。2011年6月，复旦大学国际关系与公共事务学院启动了“2010年度的高级职称聘任”工作，这一次，包括陈云在内的五名申请人，均通过了第一轮投票。

Time shift the easy，Turn to another year professor title selection。In June 2011，Fudan university international relations and public affairs college launched“2010 year's senior professional title appointment”work，This time，Chen yun, including five applicants，All through the first round of voting。

　　但事情似乎总要有些风浪。原本以为“终于能通过正教授”评审的陈云，在时隔半年后的12月底，被告知自己在评选的外审环节中，没能通过。“我的成果是最突出的。”陈云觉得愤怒而委屈。事发当天，她递交了申诉书，并直言自己的申报无论是数量还是质量，都在高级职称申报者中名列前茅，出现这样一个反常的结果，“要么是外审专家给出了不恰当结论，要么就是受到了外部干扰或暗示。”但复旦大学人事处却并不这样认为。有工作人员介绍说，外审是盲审，即审与被审的双方都不认识，“选上了就高兴，选不上就不高兴。三年都没上，我只能说她的对手太强了。”

But things always seems to want to some waves。thought“Finally can through the full professor”Review of Chen yun，In the after half a year after the end of December，Was told himself in the selection of the judge in the link，You can't pass。“My achievement is the most outstanding。”Chen yun feel angry and injustice。The day，She handed in declaration，And the truth own declaration regardless of being quantity or the quality，In the senior professional title declarant is one of the top，Such a freak result，“Or is careful outside experts gave an inappropriate conclusion，Or it's affected by the external interference or implied。”But the personnel department of fudan university but don't think so。The staff member said，Outside careful is blind trial，That is careful and be careful of both parties do not know，“Choose up happy，Choose not they will not be happy。Three years are not on，I can only say that her opponent is too strong。”

　　在陈云向记者提供的一众教授名单中，的确有人认为陈云外审未通过，其原因来自她自身竞争力不够。“评选教授，大家的水平都很高。而且考验的是参选者的综合素质和水平。”而对于是否如陈云所言，她在连续三年的高级职称评选中都遭受了不公正待遇，该教授并不愿发表意见。

Chen yun told reporters in provide a list of all the professor，Indeed some people think that Chen yun outside careful not through，Its reason from her own competitive power is not enough。“Selection professor，Everyone's level is very high。But the test is a candidate's comprehensive quality and level。”For whether such as Chen yun said，In her for three consecutive years of senior professional title selection in all suffered unfair treatment，The professor does not want to comment。

　　也有人为陈云叫屈。有专门嘱咐记者不要提及姓名的教授，在接受采访时表示，很多学校在送外审材料的时候，都会给外审专家一些暗示，“外审虽然叫盲审，但实际上评审材料拿出去的时候都是有对方的单位和名字的，彼此之间打招呼也是经常的事，这算是高校的行内潜规则。”

Also some people cry foul for Chen yun。A special charge reporters don't mention of the name of the professor，In an interview said，A lot of schools in to the trial materials，Will give careful outside experts some suggestive，“Careful outside although called blind trial，But in fact review material take out are each other's unit and name，Greet each other is often things，This is the university row latent rules。”

　　为了给自己要个说法，陈云向复旦大学申请公开每位外审专家的评审意见和结论，以及外审专家的基本情况。今年3月底，校方答复了陈云，但内容却让她沮丧。在答复内容中，五名专家被分别以数字1至5代替，“不予公开评审专家的个人信息”。五人中仅有三人同意其申报教授职称，一名专家的反对理由是，“三份代表作，日文版与英文版是相同内容……遗憾的是，代表作均为两人合作，而不是申请人个人的成果。”

In order to give myself to a statement，Chen yun to fudan university for application for public each careful outside of the evaluation opinions of experts and conclusion，And the basic situation of careful outside experts。By the end of march this year，The school reply to the suggestion，But content but let her depression。In the reply of the content，Five experts were Numbers for 1 to 5 instead of，“Not to public evaluation expert personal information”。Among the five only three people agree to the declaration professor title，An expert's objection was，“Three copies of the masterpiece，Chinese and English are the same content……It is a pity that，Magnum opus are two people cooperation，Not the applicant personal achievement。”

　　而在陈云看来，参加外审的专家基本情况(主要是专业背景)并不应成为秘密。尤其是目前的外审专家的客观公正性理应受到严重质疑，校方理应公开相关信息。

And in Chen yun looks，To participate in the review of experts basic situation(Basically be professional background)Shall not become a secret。Especially the current outside careful expert objective deserves serious questions，The university should be open related information。

　　在校方的答复中，同样拒绝公开的还有连续三年教授职称评审中，各申报人的申报材料。复旦大学的回复称，“学院已经进行了公示，评审结束后，申报材料已经退还了申请者本人。因此，学校无法提供该三项信息”。对于校方的这一答复，陈云感到了彻底的失望。她决定寻找新的途径，为自己寻求公正。

In the response，Also refused to open and three years in a row in professor title appraisal，Should the declaration materials。Fudan university reply said，“College have been public，After the review，Filing materials has returned to the applicant。therefore，The school cannot provide the three information”。For the school this reply，Chen yun was bitterly disappointed。She decided to look for new ways，For seeking justice。

　　

高校信息 公开第一案？ The first case information openness？

　　陈云决定起诉母校。终于知晓了实情的父母，从绍兴老家急匆匆赶到上海，听完女儿的讲述后，两位老人目瞪口呆，“在他们看来，复旦大学毕竟是我的母校，是我成长的地方，是我应该感恩的地方。”可冷静下来，他们又支持女儿这种有理有节为自己讨说法的行为。

Chen yun decided to bring a suit against his Alma mater。Finally know the whole truth parents，From shaoxing hometown hurried to the Shanghai，After hearing daughter after about，Two old men stunned，“In their eyes，After all, fudan university is my Alma mater，Is the place where I grew up，Is the place where I should be thankful。”Can calm down，And they support for his daughter this rational nodulation for saying behavior。

　　其实矛盾的并非只有父母，陈云自己也曾经为此纠结。在她看来，起诉母校，既是为了自己的权益，也是为了挽救母校的声誉，“过多的忍让，就成了纵容，只能让这种不公变本加厉。”

In fact the contradiction is not only parents，Chen yun oneself also have therefore ravel。In her eyes，Prosecution Alma mater，Is not only for their own rights，Also in order to save the Alma mater reputation，“Too much tolerance，Became indulge，Can only let this injustice be further intensified。”

　　而在校园内，陈云也处于夹缝之中。有人在陈云博客中留言质疑甚至指责，也有她自己的学生为她举手支持，当然，更少不了前来劝慰的同事陈云将他们称为“说客”。

And in the campus，Also at the crack of Chen yun。Someone in the blog in Chen yun message questioned even accused，Also has her own students for her hands up support，Of course，More not to try to tell colleagues will they called Chen yun“lobbyists”。

　　在陈云转发给记者的一封邮件中，有同事表示“理解你作为一名人民教师，三次没有上教授被逼到墙角的感受，以及你个人尊严受到的挫折。但任何一个旁观者都清楚，现在你在墙角，其实校和院也在墙角，到了这一步，棋都很难下，甚至根本下不下去。有和才有解，所以，我觉得僵下去，最后问题还是解决不了。所以，你退一步能赢得主动，进一步则可能永远难解无解。”

Chen yun in forward to reporters in an email，A colleague said“Understand you as a people's teacher，Three times did not have the professor was forced to corner feelings，And your personal dignity has been setbacks。But any a bystander are clear，Now you in the corner，In fact the school and court also in the corner，At this stage，Chess under it is difficult to，Don't even go down。Have and to have the solution，so，I felt stiff down，The last problem I still can't work it out。so，You step back to win the initiative，Further may never be solution without solution。”

　　但已然感到筋疲力尽甚至窒息的陈云显然不打算退一步了事。

But already exhausted even asphyxial Chen yun obviously not going to step back and over with。

　　7月18日，她向上海市杨浦区人民法院递交了诉状，继续要求被告复旦大学向她公开连续三年正高级职称申报人的相关材料、2009年度评审会议记录以及2010年度外审专家的基本情况。

On July 18,，She told Shanghai yangpu district people's court to submit a complaint，Continue to ask the defendant fudan university public to her for three consecutive years is senior professional title of the relevant materials should、2009 annual review meeting record and 2010 year careful outside the basic situation of experts。

　　在另一份同时提起、递交由北京市第一中级人民法院的诉状中，她也同时起诉了教育部，理由是希望能对复旦大学在教授职称评审中的违法行为进行查处。

In another mentioned at the same time、Submitted by the Beijing first intermediate people's court in the complaint，She also filed a lawsuit against the ministry of education，Reason is the hope of fudan university professor title appraisal in the illegal behavior in the investigation。

　　作为国内知名的行政诉讼律师，袁裕来代理了陈云起诉母校及教育部的案件。如果顺利开庭，此案将成为全国高校信息公开诉讼第一案。“这是高校教师职称评审中比较典型的授权组织的行政行为。”

As a famous domestic administrative litigation law，YuanYu agent to Sue Chen yun Alma mater and the case of the ministry of education。If the smooth opening，The case will be one of the university information public litigation first case。“This is the university teachers' title appraisal is the typical authorized organization of administrative behavior。”

　　袁裕来说，在高校中这是个很普遍的事情，这就好像黑幕里的黑洞一样，需要被人揭开。“陈云在这个事情上是非常有勇气的，只有更多的人去争取自己的权益，社会才会进步。每个人争取自己的权益，不仅是公民的义务，也是对社会和国家的义务。”

YuanYu for，In the colleges and universities in the this is a very common thing，It was like a black hole in the shady as，Need to be uncovered。“Chen yun in the matter it is courage，Only more people to fight for their own rights and interests，Society can progress。Everyone for their own rights and interests，Not only is a citizen's obligation，Also is to the society and the state compulsory。”

　　截至记者发稿时，北京市第一中级人民法院已经退回了陈云的诉状；上海市杨浦区人民法院尚未作出任何回应。尽管有律师界人士，对此案是否能够开庭表示并不乐观，但仍在等待的陈云表示，自己申请的信息公开，仅仅是前戏，重点是这其中的腐败和不公，并希望能够达到正本清源的效果。“不管结果如何，该走的程序我一定会走完。”

At press time，The Beijing first intermediate people's court has rejected Chen yun thought of complaint；Shanghai yangpu district people's court has not made any response。Although there are legal persons，For the case whether can session said is not optimistic，But is still waiting for the said Chen yun，Apply for their own information publicly，Is only the first play，Focus is the corruption and injustice，And hope to be able to reach the right effect。“Regardless of the outcome，Should go program I will go out。”

　　在自己的博客中，陈云说复旦大学已经有超过一百年的历史，无论是创始人，还是历任校长，抑或一名学生、一个老师，我们都只是她生命中的一个过客而已。“希望所有她的有缘人，都能对得起煌煌校史。”(记者 冀强)

In his own blog，Chen yun said fudan university has more than one hundred years of history，Whether it is the founder of the，Or successive principals，Or a student、A teacher，We are all just her life just a passer-by stops。“Hope that all her is predestined friends the human，Can rise, the history of the tyger。”(Reporter JiJiang)