天津“新苗三幼”一不满三岁幼女死亡事件引发关注，其家属发帖质疑死因并公布遗体照片。中国网事记者从天津有关方面获悉，警方初步调查显示，女童是被遗忘在校车内高温闷死，但负责接送的司机确在女童死前对其进行过猥亵。警方已控制多名嫌疑人，案件正在侦办中。天津警方主要领导表示必将依法严惩。(9月19日新华网)

tianjin"Bud three young"A less than three years old girl deaths caused concern,Their family members to post question remains the cause of death and published photos.China net matter reporters from tianjin the learned,An initial investigation showed,Girl is forgotten car in high temperature suffocated,But is responsible for pick-up driver are girl died before they made obscene.The police have control the number of suspects,The case is under the investigation.Tianjin police main leaders say will be severely punished according to law.(On September 19 xinhua net)

　　上面这段话就是今天的新闻《3岁女童下身带血被闷死死前遭接送司机猥亵》的全部。其实这事件在初发新闻《3岁女童幼儿园死亡下身带血警方称校车内闷死》前一天就披露过。前一天的新闻中说，小青青2岁10个月零11天，也是她上“新苗三幼”幼儿园的第三天，下午4点半妈妈再见到小青青时惊呆了：光着上身，内裤反穿着，脸上、身上都有伤；小手紧握、身体僵硬，胸部有七八个洞，已没有呼吸；下半身有血迹，貌似遭遇过性侵。但是警察说孩子是在接送车里闷死的，不具“性侵”可能。

The above paragraph is today's news[3 years old girl para with blood was boring before and by shuttle driver obscene]all.In fact, this event in its primary news[3 years old girl's kindergarten death para with blood police say the school bus in suffocation]The day before is a disclosure.The day before the news said,Small green 2 years old 10 months, 11 days,Is her"Bud three young"The third day of the kindergarten,At half past four in the afternoon to see the little green mother when startled:Bare to the waist,Against wearing underwear,face/Body all wound;Hands hold/stiff,Chest have hole,Has not breathing;Have lower blood,Seemingly encountered sex abuse.But the police said the child is in the shuttle in the suffocation,Do not have"Sexual harassment"may.

　　过了一夜，新闻说，警方初步调查显示，女童是被遗忘在校车内高温闷死，但负责接送的司机确在女童死前对其进行过猥亵。然而这一行文字的新闻，还是给读者留下3个疑点。第一个疑点，前一天警方说“不具性侵可能”，是根据什么证据下的结论？过了一夜警方说“对其进行过猥亵”，又是根据什么证据下的结论？第二个结论的证据，是什么时候发现的？换言之，下第二个结论的证据，在下第一个结论时是否已经被发现？

overnight,News said,An initial investigation showed,Girl is forgotten car in high temperature suffocated,But is responsible for pick-up driver are girl died before they made obscene.However, this one text line of news,Still give the reader left three points.The first points,The day before the police said"Do not have sexual harassment may",What evidence is based on the conclusion?After a night police said"The made obscene",It is also based on any evidence of the conclusion?The second conclusion evidence,When I found?In other words,The first two conclusions of evidence,In the first a conclusion whether have been found?

　　第二个疑点，负责接送的司机在女童死前对其进行过猥亵，这表达很含糊。猥亵，闷车，死亡，是什么时间顺序？是女孩先被司机猥亵，再被故意锁在车里，再被闷死，还是先被失误锁在车里，发现昏迷而猥亵，再导致死亡？显然，这两种情况，对于犯罪嫌疑人的问罪，可能是不一样的。前者是预谋作案，后者临时作案。不过两者都是极其凶残的。

The second doubtful points,Responsible for pick-up driver in the girl's death before they made obscene,This expression is very ambiguous.obscene,Stuffy car,death,What is the time sequence?Is a girl be driver obscene,Be intentionally lock in the car,Be suffocated,Or be mistakes lock in the car,Find coma and obscene,To cause death?obviously,The two kinds of cases,For the criminal suspect arrives,May not be the same.The former is premeditated crime,The latter temporary crime.But both are extremely brutal.

　　第三个疑点，“天津警方主要领导表示必将依法严惩”。这个案件显然已经不是《中华人民共和国治安管理处罚法》的范畴，警方哪里来的权力对犯罪嫌疑人“依法严惩”？这是刑事案件，适用于刑法，怎样惩罚是法院的权力。警方的职责，是严谨侦查犯罪嫌疑人的作案证据，弄清楚幼女死亡的前前后后，把经得起检验的案卷移交检察院。是不是这样？(柏文学)

The third doubt,"Tianjin police main leaders say will be severely punished according to law".The case have apparently not[Public security administration punishment law of the People's Republic of China]category,The police where come of power to the criminal suspect"Severely punished according to law"?This is a criminal case,Suitable for criminal law,How to punish is the court's power.The police duties,Is rigorous investigation of a crime suspect's crime evidence,Make it clear that infant daughter death of up and down,The verifiable files over procuratorate.Is this?(Cypress literature)

　　(来源:红网)

(Sources: rednet ()