一个同时有着43个收费培训班的少年宫,同期却只有4个免费班,其公益性是令人怀疑的。根据天桥区少年宫方面的解释,培训收费主要是为现实所迫,“运行的资金缺口肯定要靠收培训费来补偿”。有资金缺口或是现实,但能否以此作为收费理由,大有疑问。

A at the same time has 43 fees training children's palace,During the same period but only four free class,The public welfare is suspect.According to the days of flyover children's palace to explain,Training fee is mainly for forced by reality,"Operation of the financing gap must want to rely on the training to compensate for".Have the funds gap or reality,But whether this as a reason for charge,Great doubt.

　　要撇清质疑,就必须有严格的账务公开,尤其是对财政拨款的少年宫而言,收费的依据是什么?每年收了多少,又用在哪里?这些问题都应该对学生家长有个明确说法,绝不能以一句模棱两可的资金缺口,就偏离了公益的宗旨。

Be left clear question,We must have the strict account open,Especially for fiscal appropriation for the children's palace,Fees are based on what?The year how much,And where?These problems should be parents of students have a clear view,Can never with a equivocal financing gap,Is deviated from the purpose of public welfare.

　　另一方面,即便确实存在资金缺口问题,也不能成为违规收费的挡箭牌。少年宫存在的意义,就是要通过这样的公益机构,给青少年提供一个学习娱乐的场所。政府部门对收费标准的严格限定,就是为了确保公益的底线。如果一边打着公益的牌子,一边收取市场的价格,只会毁了公众对少年宫的期待和信任。

On the other hand,Even really exist financing gap problem,Also can't become illegal charge shield.Children's palace the meaning of existence,Is to through such public welfare institutions,For teenagers to provide a learning place of entertainment.The government departments to strictly limit the charging standard,In order to ensure that the public welfare is the bottom line.If one side under the brand of public welfare,Side collection market price,Can only ruin the public children's palace expectations and trust.

　　少年宫事业的发展,不能靠培训市场的盈利来推动。让公益的归公益,市场的归市场,少年宫不能两头通吃。(石念军)

The development of the cause of children's palace,Can't rely on training market profit to promote.Let the public welfare the return to public welfare,The market to market,Children's palace can't two armored head.(ShiNianJun)