福州的张女士在一家培训机构报考职业资格考试后，因为在考试前四天才获悉报名失败，和培训机构产生了纠纷。于是，张女士在网上发帖表达自己的不满，可没想到，这家培训机构竟在回帖时公布了她的个人信息，这让她颇为不满。

Ms. Zhang fuzhou in a training institutions to enter oneself for an examination after the exam of the professional qualification,Because in the examination of the first four genius failure to enroll,And training mechanism has the dispute.so,Ms. Zhang on the net post express their dissatisfaction,However,,The training institutions in reply that released her personal information,This let her rather discontent.

报名后一番苦读 考前方知没报成 After signing up, take an examination of a swot ahead to know not to

　　在福州工作的张女士昨日向本报反映称，自己想报考二级企业人力资源管理师资格考试，但工作年限没有达到报名要求，就在今年9月份向福州博思达教育培训机构咨询报考事宜(下文简称博思达)。当时工作人员告诉她，虽然没有达到条件，但如果通过机构报名，并参加培训班，他们可以通过“关系”帮她成功报名。

In fuzhou work yesterday to ms. Zhang to our reflect says,You want to enter oneself for an examination secondary enterprise human resources management division qualification test,But life does not meet the requirements,In September this year to fuzhou bo da education training institution consultation to enter oneself for an examination matters(Hereinafter referred to as the "bo da).When staff told her,Although there is no achieve conditions,But if through the agency registration,And participate in training,They can through the"relationship"Help her successful registration.

　　张女士称，自己随后交了1067元的报名费，并参加机构组织的一些培训课程。然而，在11月14日，也就是考试前4天，她才知道自己因为条件不符，根本没有报上名。

Ms. Zhang said,Then his pay 1067 yuan fee signing up,And to participate in the organization of some of the training course.however,On November 14,,Before the exam is 4 days,She didn't know I not because of the condition,No name in the newspaper.

　　张女士称，自己随后跟博思达方面产生了纠纷，虽然多番交涉后，对方返还了自己900多元的报名费，但是自己之前的一番辛苦备考却白费了，感觉被培训机构忽悠了，于是就在网络上发帖表达对博思达的不满。

Ms. Zhang said,His later with bo da aspects to have the dispute,Although repeated after negotiations,The other party returned to his 900 multiple entry fee,But my previous a hard for reference but in vain,Feeling is a cheat training institutions,Then on the network post express the bo da dissatisfaction.

网上发帖表不满个人信息被曝光 Online post table dissatisfaction personal information is exposure

　　张女士称，自己在网络上发帖后，博思达方面多次拨打她的电话，要求删帖，在遭到拒绝后，博思达竟然在网帖留言中公布了自己一系列的个人信息。

Ms. Zhang said,Yourself on the network after Posting,Bo da aspects multiple call her telephone,Request delete,In the after being rejected by the,Bo da unexpectedly in the net for the message by his series of personal information.

　　昨日上午，记者在福州小猪网张女士所发的帖子中，看到博思达在网帖的留言中对张女士反映的情况进行澄清。而留言信息中，公布了张女士的姓名、身份证信息、手机号码、工作单位等一系列的个人信息。

Yesterday morning,Reporter in fuzhou pig to ms. Zhang and issued by the posts,See bo da in the net post message to ms. Zhang reflect the condition of clarification.And the message information,Announced ms. Zhang's name/Id information/Mobile phone number/Work unit and so on a series of personal information.

　　张女士称，自己事后多次联系博思达方面，要求对方删除网帖上的信息，但是却没有成功，“他们说除非我把帖子给删除了。”

Ms. Zhang said,His many times after contact bo da aspects,Demand the other party to delete the information on the net post,But without success,"They say unless I have to delete the posts."

　　记者昨日联系了张女士在博思达所报培训班的班主任谭老师。谭老师称，张女士在网上反映的情况并不属实，所以机构的工作人员特地在上面回帖进行澄清。而对于公布张女士个人信息的情况，谭老师称工作人员当时的确没有征得对方的同意，将会联系网站管理员，将张女士个人信息删除，但是澄清内容将会保留。

Contact reporters yesterday in the ms. Zhang bo da the training class teacher in charge teacher tan.Tan teacher says,Ms. Zhang in the online reflects is not true,So agency staff specially above reply for clarification.For ms. Zhang published personal information situation,Tan teacher said staff did not consent to each other,Will contact the webmaster,Ms. Zhang personal information will be deleted,But clarified content will be retained.

　　记者昨晚再次登录网帖时看到，博思达的留言内容已经被修改，张女士的个人信息已经被隐去。

Reporter last night and see when they log on again for,Bo da message content have been modified,Ms. Zhang personal information has been hidden to.

律师：泄露个人信息涉嫌侵害学员隐私 lawyer:Reveal personal information suspected violations students privacy

　　福建创元律师事务所蔡思斌律师表示：培训机构和学员之间实际上建立了服务合同关系，作为合同主体，双方本应如实按约履行相应义务，如培训机构随意更改计划等做法，已经构成违约，本应承担相应的违约责任。现培训机构非但无诚意道歉，相反却擅自泄露学员的身份信息，此做法侵害了学员的隐私权。

Fujian and yuan CaiSiBin law firm lawyers said:Training institutions and students actually between established service contract relationship,As the contract,Both sides should be according to the corresponding obligations according to the facts about performance,Such as training institutions optional change plan and practice,Has constituted a breach of contract,This shall bear corresponding liability for breach of contract.Now training institutions not only insincerity apology,But contrary to reveal the identity of the students without information,This way the infringement of the students' right of privacy.

　　蔡律师表示，所谓隐私权是指自然人享有的私人生活安宁与私人信息秘密依法受到保护，不被他人非法侵扰、知悉、收集、利用和公开的一种人格权。根据我国《侵权责任法》第二条规定，侵害隐私权的，应依法承担侵权责任。故学员可依法要求培训机构承担侵权责任。(海峡都市报 记者 施建华)

Choi lawyer says,The so-called privacy is refers to the natural person enjoy private life peace and private information secret are protected by law,Don't be other illegal intrusion/Aware of/collection/Use and open a right of personality.According to our country[Tort liability law]The provisions of article 2,Invasion of privacy of,Should assume tort responsibility according to law.It may, in accordance with law students for training institutions assume tort responsibility.(Channel metropolis daily reporter ShiJianHua)