各高校的期末考试正在紧锣密鼓地进行,网络上疯传这样一条微博：据说山大某院期末考试最后一道题，18分：选出你认为上课最积极的3名同学和翘课最多的3名同学。视与主流答案相符程度给分，完全不相符得0分。（中国之声《央广新闻》1月19日)

Each college exams are busy for,The network crazy pass such a micro bo:It is said that a hospital of shandong university, the final exam the last question,And points:Do you think the most positive elected class 3 students skip class and most 3 students.Depending on the degree of match with the mainstream of the answer to the points,Completely don't agree with 0 points.(The sound of China[Wide central news]On January 19,)

　　“检举翘课最多同学”入考题，这样的考题的确是“神题”，如果答得不与主流答案相符或是不答，那就不得分，就会影响到自己的成绩。可能为了得分，哪怕是自己就是“翘课最多同学”，也得先检举自己，这样的考题，实在令人纠结。

"Most students report to skip class"Into questions,This paper is indeed"God question",If the answer is not consistent with the mainstream of the answer or no answer,That does not score,Will affect your performance.May in order to score,Even if is himself"Most students skip class",Also have to report himself,This paper,Is very ravel.

　　出题的教师表示，这道题考核的是企业绩效管理中的同事相互评价，通过这种理想的绩效评估，被评估者不仅可以从自己、上司、部属、同事甚至顾客处获得多种角度的反馈，也可从这些不同的反馈清楚地知道自己的不足、长处与发展需求，使以后的职业发展更为顺畅。但采取检举的方式全面考核员工，恐怕只会使企业陷入互相猜疑的氛围之中。

On the teacher said,The problem is the assessment of enterprise performance management of colleague mutual evaluation,Through this ideal performance evaluation,The assessed can not only from your own/boss/subordinate/Colleagues and even the customer get a variety of Angle feedback,Also can from these different feedback clearly know my own shortcomings/Strengths and development needs,In the future career development more smoothly.But the way to report comprehensive evaluation staff,I'm afraid I will only make enterprise into the atmosphere of mutual suspicion.

　　教师考学生专业知识，不该采用检举的方式。同学之间打小报告，互相检举的方式，作为一种校园告密文化，是许多人深恶痛绝的。虽然这样的方式会让老师得益，但会使同学之间产生矛盾，伤害相互的信任。这样的考题实在不该出现。

The teacher examined the students in professional knowledge,Shouldn't the report way.Between the classmate dozen small report,Each report way,As a kind of campus peach culture,Is that many people hate.Although this way will make the teacher benefit,But can make students contradiction between,Damage of mutual trust.Such questions really shouldn't appear.

　　王军荣（教师）

WangJunRong(The teacher)

　　相关阅读： readings:

　　怪题>>国外高校招生面试考题：人为什么有两只眼睛 Strange questions>>Foreign universities and colleges admissions interview questions:Why people have two eyes

　　"人为什么有两只眼睛？""诗歌是否一定很难懂？""动物有思想吗？""你会如何设计一座水坝？""你倾向于挽救雨林还是珊瑚礁？"……这些看起来让人"摸不着头脑"的问题，都是国外高校的招生面试考题。

"Why people have two eyes?""Poetry is must be very hard to understand?""Animals have thought?""How would you design a dam?""You tend to save the rainforests or coral reefs?"……These look let a person"confused"problem,Are foreign university admissions interview questions.

　　怪题>>南科大另类考题从1写到300 学生喊易校方称难 Strange questions>>South university alternative questions from 1 wrote 300 students shout easy to university officials said

　　第一套题要求7分钟就得上交，而题目也让人"大跌眼镜"：从1写到300，不得有修改。一位考生考后称，第一道题就印证了朱校长说的考察要求：测试注意力。

The first set of questions for 7 minutes have to hand in,And the topic also let a person"levels":From 1 wrote 300,There shall be no change.A test after the said,The first question is proved and the principal said inspection requirements:Test attention.

　　神题>>高二历史试卷现“神题”：本班历史地理老师是谁 God question>>Senior high school history try book now"God question":This historical geography teacher who is

　　"高二理科班的历史、地理老师分别是？"在佛山市高明四中上周进行的第二次大考中，这道被学生称为"神一样的题目"出现在理科班的历史试卷中。昨日，出题的历史老师回应称，此举是为了防止有学生不看题目，随便乱填答案。

"The history of the school science class/The geography teacher are respectively?"In the fourth salgado_garcia last week for the second time in a big exam,This way is called students"God the same topic"In the history of the reasonable regular professional training in the paper.yesterday,On history teacher response said,This is to prevent students from a topic,Fill out the answer at random.