本报讯 自从2011年当选以来，社会有关方面和部分院士对“烟草院士”的争议就一直没有平息。昨天，中国工程院副院长、院士增选政策委员会主任旭日干接受媒体采访时表示，今后，中国工程院院士增选不再受理烟草科技领域的候选人的提名或推荐。

Report from our correspondent since 2011 since the election,The relevant social aspects and part of academician"Tobacco academician"The dispute has been not calm.yesterday,Vice President of the Chinese academy of engineering/Academician add choose policy committee director XuRiGan accepted the media interview said,In the future,Chinese academy of engineering add choose no longer accept tobacco technology candidate nomination or recommended.

　　

称号现在不能撤销 Title now can't cancel

　　旭日干介绍，最近中国工程院《中国工程院院士增选工作实施办法》做了两点重要修订。一是规定，对交叉学科候选人的评审需征求相关学部意见，由候选人所在学部和相关学部共同评审，做出全面客观评价。二是删除了“烟草科学与工程”学科。至于谢剑平的院士称号，旭日干认为，“现在还不能撤销”。院士评审和选举是严格按照章程规定的民主选举程序进行的。对谢剑平当选院士争议的处理也要严格按章程规定进行。

XuRiGan introduced,Recently the Chinese academy of engineering[Chinese academy of engineering add choose the measures for the implementation of the work]Do two important revision.One is the provisions,To interdisciplinary candidates to review from relevant divisions opinion,By the candidate in divisions and related divisions common evaluation,A comprehensive objective evaluation.The second is deleted"Tobacco science and engineering"subject.As for the title of academician XieJianPing,XuRiGan think,"Now can't cancel".Academician review and election is in strict accordance with the provisions of the articles of association of the democratic election procedures.To XieJianPing elected academician dispute will strictly in accordance with the provisions of the articles of association.

　　

烟草院士评审合格 Tobacco academician review qualification

　　旭日干表示，面对各界对“烟草院士”的质疑，中国工程院召开会议专门研究，并组织开展深度调查。调研组认真审阅核实了提名材料及评审过程认为，提名书中提到的主要工作和成果，属于基础性研究工作。谢剑平所承担的相关课题经国家有关部门批准立项，提名材料提及的各类奖励奖项，未发现造假；提名、评审过程严格按照要求进行，经过了环境与轻纺工程学部全体院士充分讨论、投票，履行了审核和法定程序，当选有效。

XuRiGan said,In the face of the from all walks of life to"Tobacco academician"questions,The Chinese academy of engineering meeting special study,And the organization carries out the depth investigation.Research group of carefully verify the nomination materials and review process think,The nomination in the book of the main work and achievements,Belong to the basic research work.XieJianPing related subject to approval by the relevant departments of the state,The nomination materials mentioned all kinds of bonus award,Not found cheating;nomination/Review process in strict accordance with the requirements,After the environment and textile engineering division of the full discussion/vote,To perform the audit and the legal procedures,Elected effective.

　　

评审期间无人反对 During the review) there is no opposition

　　旭日干说，2011年院士增选工作历时近一年，先后两次公示和两轮评审。评审期间无人从控烟角度提出异议，这点值得认真思考。我国对烟草科研成果的评价存在以经济效益为主要标准的倾向。科研立项、成果鉴定、奖励评审各个环节都强调“减害降焦”研究成果带来的巨额新增利税。评审院士过程一定程度也有类似倾向。

XuRiGan said,2011 academicians add choose work lasted nearly a year,Has two public and two rounds of review.No one from the Angle of tobacco control during the objection,It is worth consideration.Our country to tobacco scientific research evaluation is economic benefit as the main standard tendency.Scientific research project/Achievements appraisal/Reward review all links stressed"Harm reduction of reducing tar"Research results bring huge profits increased.Review the process of a certain degree also had a similar tendency.

　　

各方反应 Parties reaction

　　

调查报告不予公开 Investigation report will not be open 不能撤销院士称号 Can't cancel the title of academician

　　旭日干

XuRiGan

　　针对调查报告未公开的质疑，中国工程院副院长旭日干昨晚对本报记者表示，调查报告不会公开。旭日干表示，谢剑平的当选符合程序，对其处理也要严格按照程序。

In view of the investigation report did not open question,Vice President of the Chinese academy of engineering XuRiGan to our reporter said last night,Investigation report won't open.XuRiGan said,XieJianPing election conform to the program,The treatment will strictly in accordance with the procedures.

　　根据中国工程院章程规定，院士当前有两种“退出”方式，一是当其“个人行为涉及触犯国家法律，危害国家利益或涉及丧失科学道德，背离了院士标准时”，经提议由所在学部调查核实后审议并投票，参与投票院士满三分之二，且赞同撤销的院士满三分之二方可。另一“退出”途径是院士本人提出辞呈，经院主席团会议审查认可后生效。

According to the articles of association of the Chinese academy of engineering,There are two of the current"exit"way,When the"Individual behavior involves the national laws,Harm the interests of the state or the loss of morality in science,The standard deviation of",The proposal by the division after investigation to verify the deliberation and vote,Vote of two-thirds full,And agree with the cancellation of two-thirds full of may.another"exit"Way is academician I resigned,The presidium scholastic review shall come into force after approval.

　　“那是针对犯错误的，比如说犯罪，才是那样的”，旭日干昨天表示，谢剑平不符合第一种撤销院士称号的情况。昨天本报记者从晚上6点直至10点多次拨打谢剑平的手机试图联系，听取其本人的看法，均被挂断，并发来短信称“会议中”。

"That is to make mistakes,Such as crime,Is that",XuRiGan said yesterday,XieJianPing does not conform to the first kind of cancellation of the title.Yesterday, our reporter from 6 PM till 10 times call XieJianPing phone trying to contact,I listen to the views,Were hung up,Concurrent to message says"The meeting".

　　

希望公开评审报告 Hope public review report 谢剑平当本人请辞 XieJianPing when I resignation

　　秦伯益

QinBoYi

　　中国工程院院士秦伯益此前与钟南山、巴德年院士联合103名院士，上书工程院要求取消谢剑平的院士资格。昨天秦伯益表示，工程院领导的这次表态是一个进步，对此表示欢迎。

Chinese academy of engineering, and this is QinBoYi zhong nanshan/BaDeNian academician joint 103 academicians,Submits to cancel an academician of the Chinese academy of engineering XieJianPing qualification.QinBoYi said yesterday,The leadership of the Chinese academy of engineering the gesture is a progress,welcomed.

　　调查结论称，谢剑平参评院士的材料未发现造假。秦伯益对此持有异议，他希望工程院进一步深度调查，并公布调查结果。

Investigation concludes that,XieJianPing submit the materials of fraud was not found.QinBoYi disagree,He hopes to academy of engineering investigation further depth,And published the results of the survey.

　　“谢剑平自己退，是大家都能接受的办法”，秦伯益说：“工程院领导曾说过谢剑平本人请辞是唯一能被各个学部接受的办法，我说，如果袁隆平、钟南山自己说要退，大家会同意吗？说明支持谢剑平的人也拿不出过硬的理由，只要他愿意退大家都同意。”

"XieJianPing himself back,Is everyone can accept the way",QinBoYi said:"Academy of engineering leadership has said XieJianPing I resignation is the only can be all the way to accept,I said,Yuan longping, if/Zhong nanshan myself want to retreat,Everyone will agree?That support XieJianPing also don't have good reason,As long as he is willing to back we all agree."

　　秦伯益称，在去年2月8日工程院组织的一次会议上，他曾当面问谢剑平关于毒理和减害效价等问题，谢剑平“没有回答一句”。工程院领导曾几次劝过谢剑平本人请辞，但谢未接受。“谢剑平自己退，是现在大家都能接受的过程”，秦伯益说，工程院领导表示这是唯一能被各个学部认可的。

QinBoYi says,In the last 2 August academy of engineering organization a conference,He had to ask XieJianPing about toxicology and reduce harm valence problems,XieJianPing"Did not answer a word".Academy of engineering lead times XieJianPing advised to my resignation,But xie did not receive."XieJianPing himself back,Now everyone can accept process",QinBoYi said,Academy of engineering leaders say this is the only each division can be approved.

　　如果谢剑平本人不请辞，秦伯益建议工程院在今年6月的院士大会上对章程进行修改，再根据完善后的新章程，对一个已经是院士的人启动撤销程序。

If XieJianPing I do not resignation,QinBoYi suggest academy of engineering in the June meeting of the articles of association of the amendment,Then according to perfect the new articles of association,For a is academician people start the cancellation procedure.

　　

观点 view

　　

院士非神人 Academician not man 有错当纠正 Is wrong when the correct

　　中华预防医学会伤害预防与控制分委会副主委、新探健康发展研究中心副主任吴宜群表示，旭日干称2011年院士增选工作历时近一年，先后两次公示和两轮评审。评审期间没有人从控烟角度提出异议，这点非常值得认真思考。谢剑平的减害降焦伪科学误导的不仅仅是公众，还误导了那么多的院士，院士不是万能的，不懂就是不懂，错了就应认错。顾及面子决不是不撤销烟草院士的理由。

The preventive medicine association injury prevention and control board vice chairman/New research centre for health development, deputy director of the WuYiQun said,XuRiGan says 2011 academicians add choose work lasted nearly a year,Has two public and two rounds of review.Review period was not from the smoke control Angle to raise an objection,This is worthy of serious consideration.XieJianPing reducing harm drop focal pseudoscience misleading is not only the public,Also misled the so many academicians,Academician is not everything,Don't understand just don't understand,Wrong should be mistake.Not to face is not the reason of cancellation of tobacco.

　　在谢剑平当选之初就站出来质疑的协和医科大学教授杨功焕昨天表示，烟草院士之争已持续一年多，工程院昨天终于公开表态，从其宣布删除“烟草科学与工程”学科、今后不再评烟草院士看，工程院已知道评选谢剑平为院士做错了。

In the beginning of the XieJianPing was out of the question union medical university professor YangGongHuan said yesterday,Tobacco academician rivalry has lasted more than a year,Academy of engineering finally public comment yesterday,From its announced delete"Tobacco science and engineering"subject/In the future no longer see evaluation of tobacco,Academy of engineering already know XieJianPing for selection of doing wrong.

　　杨功焕指出，在今年1月15日“降焦减害是科学还是骗局”的研讨会上，多名院士、专家用材料明确得出结论：谢剑平没有证据证明其研究实现卷烟“减害”，因此是骗局， “谢剑平当选院士，不是他一个人的事情，是中国烟草业借以推行减害降焦骗局的重要环节。我们把材料都提交给工程院了，工程院置这么多证据不顾，继续做出不能撤销的宣传，客观效果是替烟草业做帮凶，希望三思。”

YangGongHuan pointed out that,On January 15,"Reducing tar reduction harm is science or fraud"seminar,Many academicians/Experts materials clear conclusions:XieJianPing there is no evidence that the research to realize cigarette"Harm reduction",So is fraud, "XieJianPing elected academicians,Is not he a person's things,Is China's tobacco industry so as to implement harm reduction reducing tar fraud important link.We put the materials submitted to the academy of engineering,Academy of engineering buy so much evidence regardless,Continue to make can't cancel the propaganda,Objective effect for the tobacco industry is doing an accomplice,Hope to think twice."

　　本报记者 商西 李秋萌

Our reporter business LiQiuMeng west

　　综合新华社

Comprehensive xinhua news agency