被夸大了的男孩危机 The boy crisis are exaggerated

　　面对“女高男低的分数线”，人们在讨论是否涉及性别歧视，有损公正的同时，还有一个声音反复出现：这是“男孩危机”的又一面镜子。提高女生分数线、限制录取女生的做法，或许就是与此种观点一脉相通的制度设计。

face“Since the fractional line of the low man”，People talk about whether to involve gender discrimination，Harm justice at the same time，And a voice appeared again and again：This is“Boy crisis”And a mirror。Improve the girl fractional line、Limit the practice of girls admitted，Perhaps is the idea of the system with tang design。

　　男孩危机真的来了吗?到了需要制度善意给予特别救济的程度？

Boy crisis here?To give special relief system the extent of goodwill？

　　调查数据显示，上海市的中小学生，从小学三年级到初中三年级，女生每一个科目的平均成绩几乎都高于男生。2006~2007年，拿到国家奖学金的学生中超过65%是女生；2010年，考上大学的女生数量比男生多33万。

Survey data show，The primary and middle school students in Shanghai，From the primary school is grade three to junior middle school three year，The girl every subject average scores are almost higher than that of male students。2006 ~ 2007，To get the national scholarship students more than 65% is a girl；2010 years，College girls than boys number more than 330000。

　　甚至，在刚刚结束的高考中，江苏、广东、福建、云南、辽宁、吉林、天津、新疆、广西的文理科“状元”，全部被女生夺得。

even，In the college entrance examination in just finished，jiangsu、guangdong、fujian、yunnan、liaoning、jilin、tianjin、xinjiang、Guangxi arts and sciences of“top”，Are all girls won。

　　这些数据似乎都在支撑着一个有力的结论：男生正在被女生全面超越。这也是近几年得到不少媒体和学者支持的一个观点。

These data seems to be in support of the a powerful conclusion：The boy is being girl full beyond。This is also get a lot of media and scholars in recent years to support a point。

　　不过，在“悬殊差异”面前，女生也不全然是获益者。离开象牙塔，迈入社会之后，女生的优势很快消失。许多单位还是偏向于招收男生，尽管现在毕业的女生已经越来越多。

but，in“Differences between”before，The girl is not wholly a gainer。Leave the ivory tower，Entering society when，The girl advantage disappear very quickly。Many units or prefer to recruit boys，Although graduate now girls have been more and more。

　　许多学校在某些女生考分高的专业，通常在20%~40%的自主选择中“惠男抑女”，这已是圈内人众所周知的“合乎情理”的潜规则，也是未被公众所监督的教育不公正的客观事实。

Many schools in some girls high test scores of professional，Usually in 20% to 40% of the independent choice“Hui male or female”，This is known as the man“logical”Rules underlying，Also is not the public education not just the supervision of the objective facts。

　　上海社会科学院社会学所研究员徐安琪经调查发现，尽管女生入学率上升较快，但仍然显现出教育层次越高，女生比例越低的现象。2009年女生在大专、本科、硕士和博士生中所占的比例分别为52.4%、48.9%、49.3和34.9%。许多女生考分高的专业(文科为主)，都给予男生降低入学标准的优惠待遇。一些学校认为女生比例在50%以上就达到了性别平等(但实际上该专业的女生考分高于男生的占60%~90%)，或借口女性死读书、创造性思维差、后劲不足、毕业分配难，甚至以学生宿舍中厕所等设置无法让更多的女生入住等各种理由限制或少招女生。

The Shanghai academy of social sciences of the sociology XuAnQi the study found，Although the girl enrollment rate rise faster，But still show the higher education level，The lower the proportion of girls phenomenon。2009 girls in college、Bachelor degree、Master's and doctoral theses in the proportion of 52.4% respectively、48.9%、49.3 and 34.9%。Many girls high test scores of professional(Mainly liberal arts)，All give a boy reduce admission standards of preferential treatment。Some schools that girl in proportion to reach more than 50% of gender equality(But in fact the professional girl test scores higher than that of male students accounted for 60% ~ 90%)，Or excuses women die reading、Creative thinking difference、Staying power shortage、Graduation distribution difficult，Even with the student's dormitory toilet etc to be let in setting the girl of in more or less reason to limit for girls。

　　徐安琪指出：“我们不能只看到城市女孩在学业上的进步和优势，而忽略了她们同样是应试教育和性别角色刻板化的受害者。”

XuAnQi points out that：“We can not only see city girl in academic progress and advantage，And they also ignore the education and gender role is takes an exam the stereotypes of the victim。”

　　中国教育学会副会长朱永新教授也曾讲到：“女孩子的所有优势，在大学生毕业的时候，几乎‘丧失殆尽’。用人单位或者明显或者含糊，表现出重男轻女的倾向。其中，除了对于女性需要经历生育、哺乳等事情外，往往体现出男性价值观支配下社会对于女孩子的总体认识与评价。所以，我说，需要拯救的不仅是男孩，女孩子同样需要拯救。”

China's education society vice-chairman ZhuYongXin professor had said：“The girls all advantage，In college graduation，almost‘lost’。Unit of choose and employ persons or obvious or vague，Show the tendency of boys。Among them，Except for the women need to experience the birth、Breastfeeding as it, etc，Often reflects the male domination for girls social values of the overall understanding and evaluation。so，I said，Not only is the need to save the boy，Girls also need to save。”

　　有学者指出，没有经过科学考证，甚至没有足够公开透明的录取分数线女高男低，显然不是纾解高校一些专业男女比例失调的良方，公平公正是任何时候都不能戕害的。（记者 于忠宁）

Some scholars pointed out that，No scientifically proven，Not even enough openly admit fractional line since male low，Obviously not ease the university some professional men and women out of proportion to splurge，Fair justice is any time cannot kill。（Reporter YuZhong better）