2012年高招工作尚未结束，有关高招是否公平成为人们的热点话题，与往年不同的是，今年焦点集中在录取分数线的男女分数有别以及限制男女比例。

In 2012, wise work is not yet over，The entrance is fair people become the hot topic，Unlike previous years，Focus on this year admit fractional line of men and women and limit sex ratio different points。

　　今年中国人民大学首次在提前批小语种录取时，北京地区文科的男生分数线为601分，女生分数线为614分。南京师范大学广播电视编导男生最低录取线509分，女生518分。还有媒体报道，各高校在粤提前录取一本院校第一志愿投档分数线，其中多个院校分男女划线，女生线最多高于男生44分。

This year for the first time in advance of the Chinese people's university of accepted small language，Beijing area of boy fractional line for liberal arts 601 points，The girl fractional line for 614 points。Nanjing normal university, broadcasting television playwright-director boy lowest to admit 509 points，The girl 518 points。And media reports，Various universities in guangdong admitted ahead of a college first volunteer what calm mark delivers file first fractional line，Many universities points of men and women crossed，Girls line up 44 points higher than that of male students。

　　其实，关于高招某些专业男女有别的做法，并不是肇始于今年，2005年，媒体首次曝光北京大学外国语学院小语种专业招生分数线男女有别的多年“潜规则”。

In fact，Wise about some professional men and women have the other way，And not began in this year，2005 years，The first time the media exposure Beijing university of small language specialized recruitment of men and women have other years fractional line“Unspoken rules”。

　　高校某些专业录取分数线男女有别，触动了人们的敏感神经。此举体现了性别歧视还是弱势补偿，没有经过科学考证，甚至不够公开透明的差别待遇，真的能体现设计者良好初衷么？

Some professional colleges admit fractional line is different for men，Touches people's sensitive nerve。The move reflects the gender discrimination or weak compensation，No scientifically proven，Even the transparent enough difference treatment，Really good original intention can reflect the designer？

性别歧视还是弱势补偿 Gender discrimination or weak compensation

　　孩子尚在读高一的家长卢辛行忧心地对记者讲到，“现在是一些报考小语种等专业的优秀女孩失去机会，英语、中文等文科专业也有女生占绝大多数的现象，以后是否也要限制这些专业的性别比？我的女儿高考时会不会遭遇这种不公？”

The child is still a reading of LuXin line of parents worried about reporters，“Now is some enter oneself for an examination professional small language good girl lost the chance，English、Chinese and liberal arts also have girls constitute the vast majority of the phenomenon，Whether to limit after these professional sex ratio？My daughter will not face the university entrance exam this injustice？”

　　在记者采访中，秉持这一观点的人占了大多数，认为小语种等专业分数男女有别涉及性别歧视，是在制造不公。

In an interview with reporters，This view of the people with the majority，Think small language and other professional scores male and female have differences involving gender discrimination，Is in the injustice。

　　近日，我国第一个以媒介与性别平等为关注领域的民间组织妇女传媒监测网络发表文章《好反是错？从高校分性别划线看男权布局》，指出“限招女生没有合理依据，不过是人为歧视”，“高校招生是竞争性体制，但这是人与人的竞争，不是男与女的竞争。限招女生却将焦点主观集中在性别，通过人为操作挑起性别竞争，又扮演倾向于男性的裁判，这是制造性别冲突，不利于两性和谐。”

recently，China's first to media and gender equality for attention domains of the folk organization women's media monitoring network published articles《Good except the wrong？From the gender crossed see male distribution points》，Points out that“Limit for girls no reasonable basis，But is the human discrimination”，“Enrollment is competitive system，But the competition of man against man is，Not male and female of competition。For girls, will focus only on subjective in gender，Through the artificial operation start gender competition，And the men tend to play the referee，This is manufacturing gender conflicts，Against harmony between the sexes。”

　　7月9日，长期关注性别平等的公益人士吕频向教育部申请信息公开，询问2012年的高考招生中教育部批准了哪些高校的哪些专业可以限制男女生录取比例？依据是什么？

July 9,，Long-term focused on gender equality of public welfare LvPin people to the ministry of education for public information，Asked in 2012 approved by the ministry of education in the university entrance exam of recruit students what universities can limit what professional men and women living acceptance rates？On what basis？

　　曾代理多起反歧视诉讼的公益律师黄溢智指出，依据中国加入的《消除对妇女一切形式歧视公约》和我国的教育法，高考招生中的性别限制属于国家应该消除的歧视性做法。高校招生应坚持公正原则，分数线不应该基于性别予以区分。对于高校的此类招生行为，作为行政管理机关的教育部应该负起监管责任。

Once more anti discrimination lawsuit agent on the public welfare lawyer yellow excessive wisdom said，According to the Chinese to join《To eliminate all forms of discrimination against women convention》And the education law in our country，The university entrance exam of recruit students limits should eliminate gender belong to the state of discriminatory practices。College recruit students should stick to the principles of justice，Fractional line should not be based on gender to distinguish。For the recruitment of students colleges and universities such behavior，As the ministry of education administrative authorities should take responsibility supervision。

　　与涉及性格别歧视观点相反的，为此举叫好，认为“弱势补偿”的声音也不在少数。

And contrary to claims involving character don't discrimination，For the move their，think“Vulnerable compensation”Voice is not in the minority。

　　有学者指出，对于教育弱势群体来说，仅仅强调平等对待、机会均等并不能完全实现教育公平，必须额外地进行一些“弱势补偿”。招生分数线“男女有别”饱含制度善意。坚持“性别分析”，践行弱势补偿原则，和教育公平的价值追求并不矛盾。一方面，招生机构要进一步提高“男女有别”的科学性与合理性，坚持程序正义；另一方面，公众应摘掉“有色眼镜”，对分数线“男低女高”进行理性解读。

Some scholars pointed out that，For education for vulnerable groups，Merely emphasizes the equal treatment、Equal opportunity and couldn't education fair，Must carry on the some extra“Vulnerable compensation”。Recruit students fractional line“Male and female have differences”Goodwill with system。Insist on“Gender analysis”，Practicing vulnerable to compensate a principle，And the education fair value pursuit is not contradictory。On the one hand，To further improve the recruiting institution“Male and female have differences”Scientific and reasonable，Insist on procedural justice；On the other hand，The public should be removed“Colored glasses”，For fractional line“Male low since”For rational interpretation。