观察家

observers

　　美国大学已承认该转基因试验，湖南方面为何用另一试验来否认呢？原因只有两个：一是故意隐瞒，掩盖真相；二是有关部门根本不知晓有这个试验。

The university has admitted that the transgenic test,Why hunan aspects with another test to deny?Two reasons only:One is deliberately hide,Cover up the truth;The second is the relevant departments didn't know have this test.

　　近日，“美国科研机构利用中国儿童进行转基因大米试验”事件引发轩然大波。日前，美国塔夫茨大学的华裔教授唐广文承认进行了该试验，但湖南衡阳此前“辟谣”称，在衡南进行的“类胡萝卜素在儿童体内转化成为维生素A的效率研究”试验，未与美国及境外的任何机构发生直接关系。

recently,"The United States scientific research institutions use Chinese children in genetically modified rice test"Events caused a storm in a teacup.a,The United States tufts professor of Chinese TangGuangWen had acknowledged this test,But after hunan hengyang"deny"says,In the HengNa"Carotenoids in children's body into vitamin A efficiency research"test,With the United States and abroad not any orgnaization happening direct relation.

　　很多人猜测衡阳方面的“辟谣”造假，不过，在湖南省疾控中心网站上，去年6月27日就有该“效率研究”的新闻，新闻图片显示，孩子们吃的并非转基因金大米。而且，无论是试验时间，还是试验人数，都与唐广文的试验对应不上。

A lot of people guess in hengyang"deny"misconducts,but,In hunan province CDC web site,Last June 27 have this"Efficiency research"news,News pictures showed,The children eat is not genetically modified golden rice.and,Whether test time,Or test number,And the test TangGuangWen corresponding don't.

　　此外，该“效率研究”是国家自然科学基金研究资助项目，而浙江省某小学也做过类似研究，其试验方法是让儿童食用胡萝卜素胶囊和菠菜包子，并比较儿童的维生素A膳食营养状况，与转基因技术并无关联。

In addition,this"Efficiency research"Is the national natural science foundation research project funding,Zhejiang province and a primary school also made similar research,The test method is to make the children eat carotene capsule and spinach steamed stuffed bun,And compare children's vitamin A dietary nutrition status,And transgenic technology and no relevance.

　　如此看来，双方“辟谣”和“承认”的，是两个不同的试验。

So it seems,Both sides"deny"and"admit"of,Are two different test.

　　但据唐广文的论文描述，其试验也是在“湖南某农村地区”展开的。湖南方面为何用公开的“效率研究”试验，来否认信息不透明的转基因试验？原因或许只有两个：一是故意隐瞒，有关部门掩盖事实真相、欺瞒公众；二是有关部门不知晓唐广文的这个试验，此事或系学术丑闻。

But according to TangGuangWen paper description,The test is in"Some rural areas in hunan province"expanded.Hunan aspects with public why"Efficiency research"test,To deny information opaque transgenic test?Reason perhaps only two:One is deliberately hide,The relevant departments concealed the fact/Beguilement public;The second is the relevant departments do not know TangGuangWen of this test,This matter or system academic scandals.

　　但在唐广文的论文中，第二作者是胡余明，即湖南省疾控中心主任助理，也就是在衡阳县江口中心小学进行“效率研究”的总督导；论文第四作者是王茵，即浙江省医学科学院保健食品研究所副所长，也就是在浙江某农村小学进行“效率研究”的主要参与者；论文第三作者是荫士安，即中国疾控中心妇幼营养室主任，他既和胡余明一起申报过国家自然科学基金，又与王茵等同为浙江“效率研究”的参与者。更关键的是，唐广文的论文显示本次试验是受“国家科技支撑计划”拨款的，而荫士安正是这一计划的重要相关人。

But in TangGuangWen paper,The second author is YuMing hu,Hunan province is assistant director of the center for disease control,It is in HengYangXian estuary center primary schools"Efficiency research"Total supervision;The paper fourth the writer is WangYin,Namely zhejiang academy of medical sciences, deputy director of the institute of health food,Is a rural primary schools in zhejiang"Efficiency research"The main participants in the;The paper third author is shadow and Ann,That is the Chinese CDC maternal and child nutrition leadership,He is and hu YuMing together a declaration of the national natural science funds,And with WangYin equate to zhejiang"Efficiency research"participants.More key is,TangGuangWen paper shows that this test is affected by"National science and technology support plan"Appropriation of,And the shadow and Ann is the plan of the important relevant people.

　　这个复杂的学术关系网，似乎可以解释，唐广文为何拿到的是浙江省医学科学院伦理审核委员会的审核，却在湖南做的试验。之前提到，湖南和浙江都利用儿童做过“效率研究”，会不会与唐广文的试验有什么瓜葛？更重要的是，唐广文在2008年7月试验即将开始时，将之前报告中有关中国的内容全部抹去，并在接下来几年中一直宣称试验是在美国开展的，直到本次新闻曝光。

This complex academic relationships,Seems to explain,Why get TangGuangWen is zhejiang academy of medical sciences ethical review committee,But in hunan do test.Mentioned before,Hunan and zhejiang were done by children"Efficiency research",Will and TangGuangWen test what connection?More important is,TangGuangWen in July 2008 when test is about to begin,Before will be in the report on China's entire contents erase,And in the next few years has been declared test is carried out in the United States,Until this news exposure.

　　这不禁让人产生如下疑问：这个项目如何通过了浙江省医学科学院伦理审核委员会的审核，何以在湖南进行，又怎样获得了国家经费的支持？在整个过程中，论文的几位作者胡余明、荫士安、王茵，又扮演了怎样的角色？

This can not help but make the person produces the question:This project how to through the zhejiang academy of medical sciences ethical review committee,Why in hunan,And how to attain the national funding support?In the whole process,The paper, several of the authors YuMing hu/Shadow and Ann/WangYin,And what is the role of the play?

　　单纯追求结果表达而忽略过程正义，让这项试验充满了争议。

Simple to pursue the results express and ignores the procedural justice,Let the test full of controversy.

　　因此，湖南方面应彻查2008年7月前后，与“效率研究”相关的当事各方；浙江方面亦应调查省医学科学院伦理审核委员会的审核过程；中国疾控中心和湖南疾控中心应就此事给社会公众一个明确的回应。在这个“政府欺瞒或学术丑闻”的多选问题中，公众都在等待答案。

therefore,Hunan should investigate before and after July 2008,and"Efficiency research"Relevant parties;Zhejiang aspects should also be survey province academy of medical sciences ethical review committee of the audit process;The Chinese CDC and hunan CDC should be on the matter to the social public a clear response.In this"The government beguilement or academic scandals"Propagation of problems,The public is waiting for the answer.

　　李慧翔（媒体人）

LiHuiXiang(Media people)