通讯员 陈岚 记者 李胜南

Reporter correspondent ChenLan LiShengNa

　　晚报讯 一个16岁的陕西少年，在上海某工厂打工期间，屡次威胁、尾随同在本厂工作的暑期实习工，抢走他们身边的现金和手机。去年11月，奉贤区检察院以朱某犯有抢劫罪向法院提起公诉。奉贤法律援助中心指派律师，担任未成年人朱某的辩护人，不过，律师在见到了朱某之后，觉得此案更像是寻衅滋事而非抢劫。

Evening news - a 16 years old young in shaanxi province,A factory in Shanghai during the work,Repeatedly threatened/Following with the factory work summer internship work,Take their side cash and a mobile phone.Last November,It's becoming a procuratorate to ZhuMou guilty of robbery to court to Sue.Fengxian legal aid center appoint a lawyer,As ZhuMou minors the defenders,but,Lawyer in met after ZhuMou,Feel the case more like stir-up-trouble rather than robbery.

　　朱某对本厂暑期实习工的几次威胁、抢劫都发生在去年6月下旬。去年6月25日，朱某将被害人陈某骗至一小巷内，在地上捡起一块砖头威胁陈某，抢走人民币300元。6月27日，朱某同样以用语言威胁、砸石块的办法，抢走被害人罗某5元、李某350元。6月29日，朱某尾随被害人顾某到一汽车站，用石块打他的头，抢得顾某价值153元的手机一部。 7月27日，朱某因形迹可疑，被公安机关拘留，8月25日被依法逮捕，同年11月7日，奉贤区检察院以朱某犯有抢劫罪向浦东新区法院提起公诉。

In the ZhuMou summer internship work several times threat/Robbery occurred in late June last year.Last year on June 25,.,ZhuMou will work his way up the victim cheat to an alley,On the ground to pick up a piece of brick threat to work his way up,Robbed 300 yuan.June 27,ZhuMou with the same language threat/Hit rocks way,Take the victim LuoMou 5 yuan/Li mou is 350 yuan.June 29,,ZhuMou following the victim of one to a bus stop,Use stone hit him on the head,Grab the a value of RMB 153 yuan a mobile phone. July 27,,ZhuMou for doubtful,By the public security organs of detention,On August 25th was arrested according to law,On November 7,,It's becoming a procuratorate to ZhuMou guilty of robbery to pudong new district court to Sue.

　　奉贤区法律援助中心指派上海市九鼎律师事务所韦家凯律师担任朱某的辩护人，韦律师到看守所会见了朱某，详细询问了案发经过。他认为，如果按犯罪的一般构成特征和要件分析，朱某已构成抢劫罪。因为他劫取了财产、伤害了被害人，当场使用暴力、威胁。但是，如果结合朱某和几个被害人的年龄、案发地点和被劫财物的数量、价值等方面来分析，韦律师觉得这像是寻衅滋事，最终，他决定以寻衅滋事罪为被告人朱某辩护。

It's becoming a legal aid center assigned Shanghai which carries weight law firm WeiGuKai ZhuMou a lawyer acting as the defender,Wei lawyers to house of detention met with ZhuMou,Ask for details of the crime after.He thinks,If according to the crime generally constitute characteristics and requirement analysis,ZhuMou already constitute a robbery.Because he took of property/Hurt the victim,Violence on the spot/threat.but,If combined with ZhuMou and several victims of age/The location and robbed the number of goods/Value to analysis,Wei lawyers think this is like creating disturbances,finally,He decided to stir-up-trouble crime for the defendant ZhuMou defense.

　　在庭审中，韦律师发表了如下辩护意见：第一，被告人朱某案发时16周岁，是典型的未成年人犯罪心理，主观上没有危害社会的意识。第二，朱某作案的起因是因为他身在异乡，在上海无依无靠。在笔录中，办案人员问及作案目标，朱某多次都回答说：“一般是厂里那些暑期实习工，年龄小，刚到上海，没有什么社会经验，身上多少有点生活费，我上去吓他们，他们就会害怕。 ”韦律师认为，朱某侵害的人均是在厂里实习的学生，目的是倚强凌弱，要他们身上的生活费，犯罪后果显著轻微。第三，韦律师认为，被害人的身份应认定为学生，根据《审理未成年人刑事案件具体应用法律若干问题的解释》第八条规定，“已满十六周岁不满十八周岁的人出于以大欺小、以强凌弱或者寻求精神刺激，随意殴打其他未成年人、多次对其他未成年人强拿硬要或者任意损毁公私财物，扰乱学校及其他公共场所秩序，情节严重的，以寻衅滋事罪定罪处罚”。即使朱某因情节严重构成了犯罪，也应当按寻衅滋事罪论处。

During the court session,Wei lawyers published the following defenses:The first,The defendant ZhuMou the time of the crime 16 one full year of life,Is typical of minor crime psychology,The subjective no harm social consciousness.The second,The cause of the crime ZhuMou because his body is in the foreign land,Stranded in Shanghai.In the record,Investigators asked about a target,ZhuMou times said:"The factory is generally those summer internship work,Age small,Just to Shanghai,No social experience,How many a little bit on the cost of living,I frighten them up,They will be afraid. "Wei lawyers think,ZhuMou violations of per capita in the factory is the practice of students,Purpose is to lean on strong ling weak,To them with the cost of living,Criminal consequences significant minor.The third,Wei lawyers think,The victim identity shall be determined as a student,According to[To juvenile delinquency legal the explanation of some issues]The provisions of article 8,"Already full of 16 one full year of life under the age of 18 people out of bullying/Play the bully or seek to stimulate the spirit,Optional beating other minors/Many times of other minor strong take stubbornly or any public or private property damage,Disturb the schools and other public places order,If the circumstances are serious,To stir-up-trouble crime convicted and punished".Even if the circumstances are serious ZhuMou because constitutes a crime,Also ought to according to punish stir-up-trouble crime.

　　最终，法院采纳了辩护人的意见，认定被告人朱某的行为不属于抢劫行为，而是寻衅滋事行为，应当以寻衅滋事罪论处，判处其有期徒刑一年。

finally,The court adopted the defenders opinion,That the defendant ZhuMou behavior does not belong to rob behavior,But stir-up-trouble behavior,Shall punish stir-up-trouble crime,Sentenced to imprisonment of the year.