必须明确的是，在教育经费保障的问题上，政府才是第一责任人。

Must be clear is,In the education funds on the issue of security,The government is the first responsible institution.

　　“发出去1000多份邀请函，却没有一家企业或者个人肯回应我们。”日前，在接受《工人日报》记者采访时，贵州省教育厅下属的教育发展基金会负责人这样说。该基金会自2011年6月30日成立以来，遭遇“零捐助”，发出的千余封邀请函无一回应。基金会秘书长周忆江希望社会公众不要对公益慈善机构“一棒子打死”，多伸出援助之手。

"Sent more than 1000 invitation,But no one enterprise or individual will respond to our."a,In accepting[Workers' daily,]A reporter to interview,Guizhou provincial department of education development foundation of the subordinate person in charge said so.The foundation since 2011 since the establishment of June 30,,encounter"Zero donations",Out of more than seal invitation letter no response.Foundation secretary general ZhouYiJiang hope the social public not to public charity"A bonzi killed",Many lend a helping hand.

　　1000多份邀请函与零捐助，诉求与回馈之间竟然发生如此之大的反差，确实让人不是滋味。不过，劝募遇冷，似乎也没必要急着呼唤爱心，更不能简单地把“零捐助”归咎于“郭美美事件”。毕竟，爱心捐助是一种相对比较复杂的社会互动，任何简单化的归因都失之草率。

More than 1000 invitation to zero donations,Appeals and feedback were happened between so big contrast,Really let a person not the taste.but,Fundraising encounter cold,Also seems to be no need to hurry to call love,More cannot be simply"Zero donations"Blamed on"GuoMeiMei events".After all,Compassion donation is a relatively complex social interaction,Any simplify attribution has allowed the hasty.

　　社会公众为何没有积极回应贵州省教育发展基金会的劝募邀请？一种可能是基金会劝募方式的可接受性比较差，既简单，又粗放。

The social public why not actively respond to guizhou province education development foundation fundraising invitation?One possibility is to foundation fundraising way the acceptability of the poor,simple,And extensive.

　　还有一种可能则是公众对于时下慈善机构的运行依然缺乏信心。尽管贵州省教育发展基金会一再宣称，要实行“零提留管理，全透明运行”，不过，仅仅口头上的保证并不能消释公众的担忧。在信息高度垄断、公开严重不足的情况下，社会公众还很难监督慈善机构的资金运行情况。

There is a possibility of is the public for nowadays the charity's operation is still lack of confidence.Although guizhou education development foundation that again and again,To implement"Zero tiding over management,Completely transparent operation",but,Just lip guarantee and can't dispel the public concerns.In the information high monopoly/Under the condition of serious shortage of public,The social public also difficult to supervise the charity's capital operation.

　　此外，发展贵州的教育事业，帮助需要帮助的孩子，也未必总是想着从企业和社会募捐。尽管来自民间的爱心确实可能不无裨益，但捐助并不能替代政府的教育投入。必须明确的是，在教育经费保障的问题上，政府才是第一责任人。教育资源的均衡、民众贫困的治理，政府责无旁贷。民间爱心的作用，不过是一种辅助性的救济。

In addition,Development of guizhou's education career,Help children need help,Also are not always thinking about from the enterprise and social donation.Although from folk love really that may have some help,But donations and cannot replace the government's education investment.Must be clear is,In the education funds on the issue of security,The government is the first responsible institution.Education resource equilibrium/People poor management,The government is expected to help.The role of folk love,But is a kind of auxiliary relief.

　　贵州全省853万全日制学生中，家庭经济困难学生高达400多万人。这样一个比例确实让人心痛，也迫切需要各方伸出援手。但是，根本之计，还在于政府责任的兑现，即必须改变目前这种政府教育投入不足的情况。

Guizhou province 8.53 million full-time students,Family economic difficulties students up to more than 400 people.Such a proportional really make people heartache,The parties also urgent need to lend a hand.but,Foundation of the meter,Also lies in the responsibility of the government to cash,That must change the current government education investment shortage situation.

　　要之，贵州省教育发展基金会不该坐等企业上门捐款，更不应该抱怨社会公众缺乏爱心，而是应该反思工作中的不足之处。从具体的项目做起，让社会公众感受到其改善、发展贵州教育事业的诚意。即便是其正在开展的教育系统爱心捐助活动，也应该尊重民众的意愿，要想办法让人家自觉自愿地捐款，而不是依然坚持以往的刻板模式。（胡印斌）

To the,Guizhou province education development foundation shouldn't wait for enterprise the door donation,More should not complain about the social public lack of love,But should reflect on the defects of the work.From the specific project start,Let the social public to feel the improvement/The development of guizhou education career sincerity.Even if is the ongoing education system love donations,Should also respect the will of the people,To think of a way to let people voluntarily to donation,Not still adhere to the past stereotype mode.(HuYin bin)