厦门一“失独”家庭请人“代孕”引发抚养权官司 Xiamen a"Lost only"Family please people"surrogate"Cause custody case

　　借腹生子，是否合法？如果发生争议，孩子该归谁所有？最近在厦门发生了一起因“请人代孕”引发的官司备受关注。

Borrow abdominal son,Is legal?If a dispute,Children should be who all?Recently in xiamen happened because together"Please people surrogate"Cause of concern about the lawsuit.

　　蔡某是一家电子公司的老板，每年纳税30多万元，拥有多处房产、车库。他和大学同学结婚后，育有一女。2004年，上高中的女儿不幸遭遇车祸，被撞成植物人，3年后离世。蔡家从此成了“失独”家庭。

Choi one is an electronics company boss,Each year more than 30 tax ten thousand yuan,Has many homes/garage.He and university students after marriage,Has a female.In 2004,,In high school, the daughter of car accident unfortunately,Was smashed to vegetable,Three years from the.Choi home from now on become"Lost only"family.

　　蔡家一直想再要个孩子。但是，妻子年近半百，难以怀孕。于是，他想到了通过代孕中介来达到目的。在中介的帮忙下，他认识了离过婚的女子瞿某。

Tsai family always think I'll have a child.but,His wife in recent fifty,Difficult to pregnant.so,He thought about through the surrogate intermediary to achieve purpose.With the help of the intermediary,He knew the divorced women's unique one.

　　据蔡某介绍：“当时说好代孕期间生活费是每月5000元，抱小孩时再付20万元，不过没有签书面合同，只是口头约定。”后来，按照瞿某的要求，蔡某每月给她的生活费提高到1.5万元，先后给了20多万元现金。

According to CAI introduced a:"At that time say surrogate period cost of living is 5000 yuan a month,Hold a child to pay 200000 yuan,But did not sign a contract in writing,Just oral agreement."later,According to the requirements of the unique one,Choi one every month give her living expenses increased to 15000 yuan,Successively gave more than 20 ten thousand yuan in cash.

　　在妻子的默许下，蔡某和瞿某保持了一年多的性关系。去年8月，瞿某生下了非婚生女孩小琴。可是，当蔡某和妻子按事先约定找瞿某要孩子时，她拒绝交出孩子。

Under the acquiescence of the wife,Choi one and a unique kept more than a year of sexual relationship.Last August,A unique gave birth to born out of wedlock girl XiaoQin.but,When CAI one and his wife as planned to find a unique to a child,She refused to hand over the child.

　　瞿某否认自己“代孕”，声称孩子是她与蔡某的情感结晶，跟她存在直接血缘关系，“不忍心在孩子刚出生的时候就离开自己”。

A unique deny himself"surrogate",Claimed that the child is she and tsai some emotional crystallization,There is a direct blood relationship with her,"Don't have the heart to the child just born from his".

　　蔡某夫妇多次上门找瞿某沟通，但她态度坚决。对此，蔡某很愤怒，认为瞿某把孩子留在身边，就是想利用孩子敲诈钱财。于是，他决定停止向瞿某继续提供经济支持。

Tsai a couple times the door to find a unique communication,But her attitude firmly.this,Tsai a very angry,Think a unique the child still in the side,Just want to use the child extort money.so,He decided to stop a unique to continue to provide financial support.

　　现年36岁的瞿某没有工作，她无法独立抚养孩子，遂将49岁的蔡某告上法庭，要求他提供孩子的抚养费。

The 36-year-old's unique one without work,She couldn't independent raising a child,Hence will 49 tsai a court,Ask him for the child's maintenance.

　　厦门市思明区人民法院一审审理认为，根据法律规定，非婚生子女享有与婚生子女同等的权利，任何人不得加以危害和歧视。不直接抚养非婚生子女的生父或生母，应当负担子女的生活费和教育费，直至子女独立生活为止。本案中，原、被告对非婚生女都有抚养的权利和义务，但是，哺乳期的子女应以跟随哺乳的母亲抚养为宜，被告应当支付非婚生女的部分生活费、教育费直至孩子独立生活为止。

Xiamen the Amoy area people's court of first instance trial think,According to the laws and regulations,Born out of wedlock shall enjoy the same rights and legitimate child,No one may harm or discriminate against them.Does not directly upbring his or her,Shall bear the child's living and educational expenses,Until the child is independent life so far.In this case,original/The defendant to born out of wedlock female have raised the rights and obligations,but,Lactation child should be to follow lactation mother raised advisable,The defendant shall pay the born out of wedlock female part of the cost of living/Educational expenses until the child independent life so far.

　　据此，法院判定非婚生女小琴由瞿某抚养，蔡某需支付给瞿某抚养费64万元至以小琴名义开立的银行账户。瞿某可按月支取3000元用于抚养孩子，蔡某有权对孩子抚养费的使用情况进行监督。

According to,The court decision born out of wedlock female XiaoQin unique by a raise,Tsai a need to pay a unique support 640000 yuan to XiaoQin name to open a bank account.A unique can withdraw 3000 yuan monthly for raising a child,Tsai a has the right to the use of child support, supervise and.

　　在庭审过程中，蔡某强调自己与瞿某之间存在“代孕”关系，因此孩子应由自己抚养。对此，厦门市思明区人民法院民一庭法官俞伟强认为，仅从蔡某提交的证据来看，尚无法作出明确认定是“代孕合同”。即便双方在现实中签订“代孕合同”，其法律效力仍然是无效的。目前我国法律没有对“代孕合同”作出明确规定，但卫生部于2001年颁布实施的《人类辅助生殖技术管理办法》中规定：“人类辅助生殖技术的应用应当在医疗机构中进行，以医疗为目的，并符合国家计划生育政策、伦理原则和有关法律规定。禁止以任何形式买卖配子、合子、胚胎。医疗机构和医务人员不得实施任何形式的代孕技术。”

In the procedure of trial,Tsai a stressed yourself with a unique between"surrogate"relationship,So the child should be raised by oneself.this,Xiamen the Amoy area people's court people a court judge YuWeiJiang think,Only from tsai a submit evidence to see,Still can't make a clear identification is"Surrogate contract".Even if both sides signed in reality"Surrogate contract",Its legal effect still is invalid.At present our country law does not have to"Surrogate contract"Explicitly provided,But the ministry of health issued and implemented in 2001[Human assisted reproductive technology management measures]Specified in the:"Human assisted reproductive technology application in medical institutions shall be in,Taking the medical service for the purpose,And in accord with the national family planning policy/Ethical principles and the provisions of relevant laws.Prohibited in any form buying and selling gametes/zygote/embryos.Medical institutions and medical staff shall not be implemented any form of surrogate technology."

　　根据这一规定，禁止实行代孕技术，只允许采用人类辅助生殖技术通过妻子的子宫进行怀孕。从生育权和亲权的角度来看，目前受法律保护的生育权主体仅限于缔结了婚姻关系的夫妻。合法的生育应以结婚登记并办理准生证为条件。代孕方将基于血缘关系的亲权通过代孕合同转移给求孕方，违反了亲权专属于父母，不得让与、继承或抛弃的原则。从“代孕合同”的本质来看，是将代孕方的子宫作为“物”来出租使用，将孩子作为商品交易的对象。以上两方面均反映出“代孕合同”有违公序良俗、社会公德的一面，与《合同法》的基本原则相违背，应属无效。(通讯员 杨长平 者 陈强)

According to this regulation,Prohibit a surrogate technology,Only allowed the use of human assisted reproductive technology through the wife's uterus in pregnancy.From the reproductive rights and QinQuan point of view,At present are protected by law of the right to reproduce subject is limited to concluded a marriage relationship between husband and wife.Legal fertility should with marriage registration and the ZhunShengZheng for conditions.Surrogate will based on the blood relationship of QinQuan through the surrogate contract transfers for pregnant party,Violation of the QinQuan exclusive from parents,Shall not transfer/The principle of inheritance or abandoned.from"Surrogate contract"To see the essence of,Is the womb of a surrogate party as"things"To lease use,Will the children as the object of commodities trading.The above two aspects are reflected"Surrogate contract"Acting against public order and good/Social morality side,and[Contract law]The basic principles of the phase against,Should belong to invalid.(The reporter YangChangPing ChenJiang)