俗话说得好：是骡子是马，拉出来遛遛。与其大打口水仗，莫如把时间和精力用到各自的科研上，用顶呱呱的科研成果证明自己

As the saying goes well:Is the mule is horse,Pull out for a walk.And its big play saliva battle,The time and energy is used in their research,With very good scientific research prove himself

　　 中科院和大学哪个科研实力更强？

Chinese academy of sciences and university which scientific research strength is stronger?

　　 中科院Vs大学，这是前不久科学网上争论激烈的一个热门话题。参与争论的博友分成泾渭分明的两大阵营，各自评功摆好、互不相让：甲方说，中科院有专心致志的科研氛围，乙方说，大学有自由竞争的多元文化；甲方说，中科院的研究人员多，乙方说：大学的本科生、研究生多；甲方得意洋洋：科研不到中科院，便做教授也枉然！乙方沾沾自喜：学习不在大学里，科研最好也枉然……

Chinese academy of sciences at the university of Vs,This is recently science online debate fierce a hot topic.Participate in the debate blog is divided into two major groups of entirely different,Respective evaluate achievements lay the/Eyeball over:Party a said,Chinese academy of sciences have bone research atmosphere,Party b said,University has free competition multicultural;Party a said,The Chinese academy of sciences, the researchers more,Party b said:University undergraduate/Graduate more;Party a elation:The Chinese academy of sciences research less than,Then as a professor, also in vain!Party b to be complacent about:Learning is not in the university,Research also had better in vain……

　　 之所以出现这场科研实力谁高谁低、孰强孰弱的争论，与我国近年来科研格局的变化不无关系。随着“研究型大学”、“世界一流大学”建设力度的加大，高校特别是“211”、“985”高校的科研条件、师资力量和科研水平均有大幅提升，与中科院渐成鼎足之势，两者在科研课题、经费和人才等方面的竞争日趋激烈。在这样的背景下，分属两大创新单元内的人欲比高下，自然不足为怪。

The reason that has this scientific research strength who who high low/Which is strong weak argument,In recent years in China and the change of relationship between research pattern is.as"Research university"/"The world first-class university"Construction intensified efforts,University, especially"211"/"985"University scientific research conditions/Faculty and research level are improved significantly,The Chinese academy of sciences and gradually into the other two,Both in scientific research/Funds and the respect such as the talent competition is becoming increasingly fierce.In such a background,Belong to two big innovation within the unit still poirot,Natural not surprising.

　　 值得探究的，是比拼的方式。俗话说得好：是骡子是马，拉出来遛遛。双方与其大打口水仗，莫如把时间和精力用到各自的科研上，拿出顶呱呱的科研成果来证明自己。时至今日，大学也好、中科院也好，真正能摆到国际大舞台上、让国际同行刮目相看的原创性重大成果，实在是少之又少。这与“科研投入世界第二”、“科研人数全球第一”的名头相比，怎不让人汗颜？

Important to explore,Competition is the way.As the saying goes well:Is the mule is horse,Pull out for a walk.With both sides played the saliva battle,The time and energy is used in their research,Take out very scientific research to prove himself.today,University or/Chinese academy of sciences or,How to put to the international stage/Let the international colleague sit up and take notice of the original major achievements,It is rare.this"Research into the world's second"/"The number of scientific research to be the first in the world"Compared the attitude,How not to shame?

　　 有道是“尺有所短、寸有所长”，大学和科研院所的教授、研究员，理应加强合作、取长补短，共同攀登科学的顶峰。特别是在学科交叉趋势日益明显、单打独斗难以制胜的情势下，大学和科研院所的同行，更应资源共享、优势互补、合作求赢，在协同创新上好好下功夫。而在这场充满火药味的口水仗中，不难看出争论双方“舍我其谁”、“唯我独尊”的傲慢心态。如果抱着这种心态去搞协同创新，结果可以想见。

The tao is"CheYouSuoDuan/CunYouSuoChang",Universities and research institutes professor/The researchers,Should strengthen cooperation/Complement each other,To climb the peak of science.Especially in the discipline overlapping trend is more and more obvious/Working hard to win situation,Universities and research institutes peers,More should be resources sharing/Have complementary advantages/Cooperation and win,In collaborative innovation to work hard.And in an ill-tempered saliva in battle,It is not difficult to see that the two parties in the dispute"Who but myself can do it?"/"Just me"Pride mentality.If you hold this kind of mentality to make collaborative innovation,The results can see.

　　 这场“中科院Vs大学”之争，让人不禁联想起前些年两位美籍华人科学家领受诺奖后的分道扬镳，和去年屠呦呦先生荣获拉斯克奖后引发的“谁该获奖”的大论争。三者虽各事出有因，但所折射出来的，却是“文人相轻”、“同行是冤家”的阴魂。在建设创新型国家、实施创新驱动发展战略的进程中，这种有百害而无一利的内耗文化，值得科研人员警惕。

the"Chinese academy of sciences at the university of Vs"for,Let a person can't help recalling some two Chinese American scientists received the Nobel after the separate ways,And last year, Mr. YouYou slaughter the lasker award after the trigger"Who should the"Big debate.Although each three happens for a reason,But out of refraction,is"Scholars scorn each other."/"Two of a trade never agree"shades.In the construction of an innovative country/Implement innovation drive in the process of development strategy,This is the harm and the internal friction of no culture,Worth researchers alert.

　　 所幸，这场无谓的争论已经偃旗息鼓。只有放弃门户之见，扩大国际视野，反躬自省、相互学习、真诚合作，拿真货色、比真本事、做大贡献，方能不负国人的期许。（吴月辉）

but,The messy arguments have unopposed.Only give up sectarianism,Expand international vision,Imitation introspection/Mutual learning/Sincere cooperation,Take true goods/Than right/Do great contribution,Can not people's expectations.(WuYueHui)