商报记者 陈保发

Business newspaper reporter ChenBaoFa

　　重庆商报讯 4名小学生中午放学后，相约到学校附近一水塘游泳，其中一名小学生不慎遇险，同伴听到呼声前去救人。被救者终脱险，施救者却不幸遇难。事后，救人遇难学生的家长将几名同伴和就读的学校告上法庭，要求赔偿。昨天，记者从市二中院了解到，法院终审判决学校不承担责任，由被救者及其监护人补偿遇难学生家长12万元。

Chongqing dispatch the pupils after school at noon,Meet to a swimming pool near our school,One of the primary school students and in distress,Companion to hear voice to save.BeiJiuZhe finally out of danger,People have died.After the event,Rescue victims will be the parents of your students several companions and school to court,Demand compensation.yesterday,The reporter understands from lu guoqiang,The final decision school is not liable,Compensation by BeiJiuZhe and guardian parents killed 120000 yuan.

　　据了解，2009年6月24日，就读于云阳县沙市镇某小学的学生小谭与小朱、小徐、小刘在上学途中相约到汤溪河一个小地名叫猫耳朵的河坝玩。当日中午放学后，这4名小学生如约来到这里的一水塘游泳。

It is understood,June 24, 2009,Enrolled in YunYangXian shashi town of a primary school student XiaoTan and xiao zhu/xu/Xiao liu meet to soup up on his way to school in a small place is called the cat ears play a mudslide.At noon after school that day,The four students come here for a swimming pool.

　　游了一会后，小朱快游到岸边时无力上岸，急得大声呼喊。见同伴遇险，在水塘边的小谭便伸手去拉，结果自己不慎落入水中，小朱见小谭不会游泳，便向另两个同伴小徐和小刘呼喊，小徐和小刘随即赶到，但面对在水中挣扎的小谭，这两个年幼的孩子也不知道如何施救。

After a moment of swim,Xiao zhu quickly swam to shore to shore,Nasty cry out.See companion in distress,At the edge of the pond XiaoTan will stretch out his hand to pull,Result oneself accidentally fell into the water,Xiao zhu see XiaoTan can't swim,To two other small and xu xiao liu,Xu xiao liu and get there immediately,But face the XiaoTan struggling in the water,The two young children don't know how to rescue them.

　　当时，小朱等人发现有几个大人过来，不但没向大人呼救，反而迅速离开现场，将小谭的衣服藏在一石洞中，后来也没将小谭落水的事向家长、老师及学校反映。

At that time,Xiao zhu and others found that there are a few adults,Not only didn't to adults for help,Instead of leaving the scene rapidly,The XiaoTan clothes were hidden in a cave,Later will not XiaoTan water to the guardian/The teacher and school.

　　当晚7时许，小谭的父母见儿子未回家，听别人说有小孩淹死了，才匆匆赶到出事地点，将小谭从水里捞了上来。此时，原本活蹦乱跳的儿子，已变成了一具尸体。

7 when xu,XiaoTan parents see son did not go home,Listen to other people said a child drowned,Just hurried to the accident,Will XiaoTan get up from the water.At this time,Originally, wriggling son,Has become a corpse.

　　“儿子的意外死亡，学校、另3个一起游泳的孩子都应该有责任。”事发后，小谭的父母将小朱、小徐、小刘及孩子就读的学校一起告上了法院，索赔30余万元。

"Son's accidental death,The school/Swim with the other three children should have the responsibility."After the incident,XiaoTan parents will xiao zhu/xu/Xiao liu and children attend school together on the court,Claim more than 30 ten thousand yuan.

　　小谭的父母认为，按照学校的制度，任课老师发现学生未上课，应向班主任老师通报，班主任应及时通知家长，而学校的老师、班主任均没发现并通知他们，造成孩子未能及时获救，学校对小谭的死亡负有责任。

XiaoTan parents think,According to the school system,Teacher found that students not in class,Shall report to the head teacher,The teacher in charge shall timely notify the parents,And the teachers of the school/The teacher in charge is not found and notify them,Cause children failed to rescue,Responsible for the death of XiaoTan school.

　　法院查明，被告小徐事发时11岁，小刘只有9岁。结合两人的行为，法院认为两人实施了与其年龄相适应的救助行为，在本案中并无过错，不应担责。

The court to find out,The defendant xu 11 years old when the incident,Xiao liu is only 9 years old.According to two people's behavior,Court that adapt to the two men carried out his age aid behavior,In this case there is no fault,Should not bear the responsibility.

　　另外，小谭所就读的学校在2009年6月24日下午的上课时间是14时30分，而小谭死亡时间在13时30分至14时之间，学校上课时小谭已沉入水中达到30分钟以上，按常识，小谭已无生还可能。学校在上课后未通知家长的过错与小谭之死并无因果关系，且事发地点也不在学校或学校组织的校外活动范围之内。小谭的死不属于学校等教育机构职责范围。因此，学校也无过错，不应承担责任。

In addition,XiaoTan school in June 24, 2009 in the afternoon when the class time is 14 of 30 points,And XiaoTan death time 30 points in the 13 to 14 in between,School when XiaoTan has been submerged in up to 30 minutes or more,According to the common sense,XiaoTan has no survivors.In class after school fails to notify the parents of the fault and XiaoTan death there is no causal relationship,And the place is not in school or school activities organized by the school area.XiaoTan death belong to school education institutions such as responsibilities.so,The school also no fault,Shall assume no responsibility or liability.

　　法院认为，小谭是为救助同伴小朱不慎落水淹死的，小朱作为受益人应在受益范围内予以适当补偿。考虑到小朱尚未成年，应由其监护人承担适当补偿责任，于是，法院一审判决由小朱的父母赔偿小谭家长12万元。

The court said,XiaoTan is for his comrades xiao zhu carelessly fall into water drowned,Xiao zhu as the beneficiary shall be within the scope of benefit give appropriate compensation.Considering the small zhu has not yet been adult,Proper compensation shall be borne by the guardian,so,Court verdict by xiao zhu parents compensation XiaoTan parents 120000 yuan.

　　一审宣判后，小朱的父母不服，向市二中院提出上诉，市二中院日前终审判决：驳回上诉，维持原判。

After the first sentence,Xiao zhu's parents,Appeal to lu guoqiang,Lu guoqiang before final decision:Rejected the appeal,Stay gave.