《借读生情绪障碍家长诉教师》追踪 [JieDouSheng emotional disorders parents guide teachers]tracking

　　赵女士称儿子元元（化名）在借读期间遭老师侮辱人格，导致患上情绪障碍，为此将北京市育才学校通州分校和当事老师起诉到法院，要求索赔、道歉（本报去年9月4日见报）。通州法院一审驳回起诉，昨天，赵女士提交上诉状，她表示，手头有一份长达45分钟的录音材料，足以证明老师辱骂孩子，应该改判。

Zhao said ms son till now(The allotted time periods specified by the)By the teacher during the unwelcome insult personality,To suffer from mood disorders,To Beijing tongzhou branch and parties at yu CAI middle school teacher to Sue to the court,claim/An apology(This newspaper last year on September 4, China).Tongzhou court of first instance dismissed prosecution,yesterday,Ms. Zhao submit the petition of appeal,She says,Have a more than 45 minutes of the recording materials,Enough to prove the teacher abused children,Sentences should be.

　　本报记者李秋萌

Our reporter LiQiuMeng

家长诉说 Parents complained of

老师竟然骂学生缺德 The teacher should scold students misbehave

　　据赵女士介绍，2010年11月的一天，上小学三年级的元元回家说自己被同学打，语文老师兼班主任张玉（化名）不但没有帮他，反而把他拽到办公室罚站两节课。为了解情况，赵女士在元元身上装了一个MP3，录音内容让她大吃一惊。

According to ms zhao,In November 2010 day,In primary school grade three of yuanyuan home said they were students,Chinese teacher and class teacher ZhangYu(The allotted time periods specified by the)Not only did not help him,Instead of drag him to the office make stand as punishment two classes.To know the situation,Ms. Zhao with an MP3 on till now,Recording content surprised her.

　　“我就说你坏话怎么了，你有好话让人说吗！你告诉我你有哪方面的优点让我说！说你坏话怎么了！……”赵女士说，MP3记录下张玉和其他老师在办公室对元元说的话，而这样的训斥整整持续了45分钟，其中还有元元的咳嗽声和哭泣声。

"I said what's wrong with you,Do you have a good to let a person say!You told me you have the advantage of which let me said!Say what's wrong with you!……"Ms zhao said,MP3 recording ZhangYuHe other teacher in the office for yuanyuan said,And such of whole lasted for 45 minutes,There is till the cough and cries.

　　赵女士说，张玉还经常用一些侮辱人格的话辱骂学生，比如最坏、品质低劣、动物、缺德、疯子等等。

Ms zhao said,ZhangYuHai often use some humiliating words insult students,Such as the worst/Inferior quality/animals/wicked/A madman, etc..

对心灵造成严重创伤 Causing serious trauma to the soul

　　赵女士说，从6岁到8岁，元元一直在张玉的班里学习。元元学习成绩本来非常优秀，多次在班里考第一名，但张玉多次对元元进行无休止的惩罚、谩骂、羞辱和情绪虐待，让孩子变得异常紧张、恐惧和暴躁，甚至想自杀。医生确诊结果为“儿童情绪障碍”。

Ms zhao said,From the age of 6 to 8 years old,Yuanyuan has been ZhangYu of learning in the class.Yuanyuan study result was very good,Many times in the class test first,But ZhangYu many times on the endless yuanyuan punishment/abuse/Shame and emotional abuse,Let the children become nervous/Fear and angry,Even wanted to commit suicide.The doctor diagnosed the result is"Children's emotional disorders".

　　“现在我们每周带孩子去找北大教授做心理治疗。教授说，因为体罚较多，负面评价过多，给孩子心理造成比较严重的创伤。我们曾试图劝说孩子原谅张玉，但是他没办法走出来，这几年的折磨对他幼小的心灵造成的伤害有多深，没人明白！”赵女士说。

"Now we take children to find a week of Peking University professor do psychological treatment.The professor said,Because of the large corporal punishment,Too much negative evaluation,For the child's psychological cause serious wounds.We have been trying to persuade the child forgive ZhangYu,But he can't go out,Over the years of torture to him how much damage the young heart,No one understand!"Ms zhao said.

一审判决 That verdict

虽言语不当但不担责 Although improper words but not bear the responsibility

　　去年8月，赵女士代替元元，将北京市育才学校通州分校和张玉一并诉至法院。赵女士一共提出7项诉讼请求：要求口头、书面赔礼道歉；赔偿治疗费、精神损失费等合计17万余元。同年9月20日，通州法院正式立案。

Last August,Ms. Zhao instead of yuanyuan,Will Beijing tongzhou at yu CAI middle school campus and ZhangYu along with all the appeal court.Ms. Zhao for 7 items in total:Request oral/A written apology;Compensation for the treatment/Emotional damage, such as total more than 170000 yuan.In the same year on September 20 th,Tongzhou court formally put on record.

　　去年11月27日，通州法院进行不公开审理。庭上，张玉称，可能对原告批评教育比一般的孩子多，但这正是因材施教、公平、公正对待学生的体现，也更说明了对原告的关怀，并不像原告所说的那样实施不公正待遇和非法待遇。

Last November 27,,Tongzhou court not be tried publicly.On the court,ZhangYu said,To the plaintiff criticism education than the average child,But this is what students according to their aptitude/fair/Just to the embodiment of the students,Also that more care to the plaintiff,Don't like the plaintiff for the purposes of the implementation of unfair treatment and illegal treatment.

　　庭审中，原告申请对校方、张玉在管理教育过程中的行为，与元元目前所患情绪障碍间是否存在因果关系进行鉴定。后经北京市高级人民法院摇号，未能确定相应鉴定机构。

In the trial,The plaintiff application to the university/ZhangYu in management education in the process of behavior,And till now has to identify whether there is a causal relationship between emotional disorders.After the wave of the Beijing municipal higher people's court,Unable to determine the corresponding appraisal institutions.

　　去年12月24日，通州法院一审判决，张玉在教育教学工作中虽存在语气不当、情绪急躁的情形，但并无违反师德的言行，无体罚或变相体罚的行为。元元目前所患情绪障碍与校方和张玉教育教学活动间并无因果关系。

Last year on December 24,Tongzhou court verdict,ZhangYu despite tone in the education teaching work/Emotional impatient,But there is no violation of ethics,No corporal punishment or corporal punishment in disguised forms.Till now with emotional disorders with the school and ZhangYu there is no causal relationship between education and teaching activities.

提出上诉 appeal

老师骂人有录音为证 Teacher call names are recorded as evidence

　　因对一审判决不服，昨天，赵女士向通州法院提交上诉状，要求撤销原判，依法改判。

Because is not satisfied with the verdict,yesterday,Ms zhao to tongzhou court to submit the petition of appeal,Request to cancel originally,In accordance with the sentences.

　　赵女士的代理人、北京市陈志华律师事务所律师刘巍表示，多项法规均规定教师应当尊重学生的人格，不得歧视学生，不得对学生实施体罚、变相体罚或者其他侮辱人格尊严的行为。上诉人在原审中提交的录音证据，已经证明教师张玉对学生元元存在经常性的体罚、变相体罚行为及严重的辱骂、讽刺、威吓等侮辱人格的行为，并非仅仅为“语气不当，情绪急躁”。法院“未能确定鉴定机构”后，未进一步采取补救措施，继续委托可以进行此项鉴定的机构进行鉴定，却以“摇号未能确定鉴定机构”为由，认定上诉人承担举证不能的责任，实质上剥夺了上诉人的举证权利。

Ms zhao's agent/Beijing ChenZhiHua law firm's lawyers said opportunities,Many regulations are teachers should respect students' personality,Nor may they discriminate against the student,Not corporal punishment on their students/Corporal punishment in disguised form or any other act that humiliates the personal dignity of the.The appellant submitted in the original recording of the evidence,Have proved that teachers ZhangYu yuanyuan exist regular corporal punishment for students/Corporal punishment in disguised forms of behavior and serious abuse/irony/Intimidate insults such as the behavior of the personality,Not just for"Improper tone,Emotional impatient".The court"Unable to determine the appraisal institutions"after,Not to take remedial measures,Continue to entrust to the appraisal institutions of the appraisal,But in order to"Wave number to determine the appraisal institutions"On the grounds,Adduce evidence that the appellant not responsibility,Substantially deprived the appellant's rights of evidence.