“高中、初中、小学要择校，甚至幼儿园都有‘择园’，这里面有些问题很突出。”1月26日，在省人大茂名团分组讨论会议(同时为媒体开放日活动)上，省人大代表、广东实验中学校长郑炽钦对教育债务、择校和异地升学三大问题，提出很多看法。他透露说，广东实验中学高中校区投入政府借贷占了四成，相应的，高中四成的学位，都被拿来高价“出售”用于还贷。（新快报1月27日）

"High school/Junior high school/Elementary school to,There are even kindergartens‘Choose garden’,There was some problem is prominent."On January 26,,A lot in maoming group group discussion meeting(At the same time for the media Open Day activities)on,On behalf of the provincial/Guangdong experimental high school principal ZhengChiQin to education debt/Different school and study three problems,Puts forward a lot of views.He revealed,Guangdong experimental middle school high school campus in government loans accounted for forty percent,corresponding,Forty percent of the high school degree,It is high"sell"A month to their mortgage.(New express on January 27,)

　　对此，省教育厅相关负责人称，实验中学的做法是经过省政府批准实施的。“主要考虑引入新机制，尝试吸引社会资金，提供更优质的教育资源。”同时，该负责人非常不赞成“高价”售学位拿来还钱的说法，表示非常不应该称作“高价”。根据这位负责人的回应，这所中学的做法是存在的，只是政府部门对此的认识和公众的认识不同，公众的认识是“卖学位”，而政府部门认为是“机制创新”。

this,Guangdong provincial relevant responsible person,Experimental middle school way is through the provincial government for approval."Main consideration into mechanism,Try to attract social capital,To provide more high quality education resources."At the same time,The person in charge strongly disapprove of"high"It also sell degree that money,Said very should not be called"high".According to the person in charge of the response,The school's practice exists,This is the government's understanding and the understanding of the different,The public's knowledge is"Sell degree",The government department that is"Mechanism innovation".

　　那么，贷款建学校，再由学校出售学位还贷，是不是创新呢？也许有舆论觉得不值一驳，但需要注意的是，这种想法在不少政府部门官员以及一些办学者中存在，他们认为教育投入不足、办学缺乏资金，可以“盘活”资源，“以教养教”，近年来，向银行借贷办学，在各地都普遍存在，随之而来的是，我国大学的欠债规模达到3000亿，高中学校的欠债规模也不甘落后，不少学校陷入债务危机，一些大中学校为还债，想尽办法，包括置换校园，扩大招生规模，提高学费，用学校资源搞经营，高中收取高价择校生，就是其中的一个招数。这几年来，不时有大中学校长提出收取高价“议价生”，以解决学校办学经费不足的问题。为此，有必要认真分析“办学能不能贷款”以及“非义务教育学校是否可以收取高价择校生、议价生”的问题。

so,Loan to build the school,To sell by the school degree owing on the loan,Is innovation??Maybe a public opinion think be not worth refuting,However, it should be,The idea in many government officials and some existing in the operators,They think education insufficient input/The lack of capital,can"Revitalize the"resources,"To education teaching",In recent years,Bank lending to running,Around the widespread,Along with the,Chinese universities' debt scale up to 300 billion,High school school debt scale also unwilling fall behind,Many schools in debt crisis,Some big school for debts,Try their best to,Including replacement campus,Enlarged enrollment scale,Increase tuition fees,With the school resources make business,High school ZeJiaoSheng charge high prices,Is one of the way.In the past few years,From time to time have proposed secondary principal charge high prices"Bargaining born",In order to solve the problem of shortage of funds for school.therefore,It is necessary to carefully analyze"Can the loan"and"Is not compulsory education school whether can ZeJiaoSheng charge high prices/Bargaining born"problem.

　　办学能不能贷款？我国《教育法》规定，“国家鼓励运用金融、信贷手段，支持教育事业的发展”，这似乎给了贷款办学以法律依据，但是，依照我国《教育法》、《义务教育法》和《高等教育法》，学校举办者必须保障学校的办学经费。解读以上法律，不难得到，学校的举办者是可以贷款投入办学的，但学校却不能作为主体去借贷。政府举办学校，缺钱可以借贷，但应该由财政归还贷款，而不是由被投入的学校来解决贷款问题，因为作为事业单位的学校，是非营利性的，学校无法靠经营收入去归还贷款，如果要学校解决学校办学资金问题，其结果必然是学校提高学费标准、用学校资源去搞经营，这显然影响教育公平，也会分散学校的办学精力。

Can the loan?Our country[education]provisions,"The state encourages the use of financial/Credit means,Support the development of the cause of education",This seems to give the loan to the legal basis,but,According to our country[education]/[Compulsory education]and[Higher education],The school must guarantee the school funds.Interpreting the law,It is not difficult to get,The school the loan can be in the running,But the school but not as the main body to lending.The government held the school,Lack of money can lending,But should the financial loan repayment,Not by were put in school to solve the credit problems,As institutions of the school,nonprofit,The school can't get by on business income to repay the loan,If you want to solve the problem of funds school school,The result must be to improve school tuition standard/With the school resources to do business,This obviously affect education fair,The school will disperse energy.

　　非义务教育学校是否可以收高价择校生、议价生？赞成者的理由之一是国外大学也拿一定名额收“议价生”，一来社会上有一批富人，有让子女上更好的学校的需求，也拿得出这笔钱，二来学校可以把这笔钱用到学校发展中，包括面向贫困学生设立奖学金，这可谓用少数名额换来更大程度的教育公平。可是，赞成者只看到了表象，却忽视了国外大学的运行机制，首先，这只发生在私立大学，由政府举办的公立大学不允许；其次，大学实行现代学校制度，相关收取“议价生”的决策，由大学理事会做出，收取的标准事先向社会公开，过程透明；再次，学校财务管理透明，收来的所有费用及其支出向师生和社会公众公开，确保所有钱都用到办学至上。而就是如此，对于私立大学收取少量的“议价生”，舆论照样有质疑，一些私立学校已经取消了这一做法。

Is not compulsory education school whether can accept ZeJiaoSheng high price/Bargaining born?One of the reasons why the pros is a foreign university will also take a certain number receive"Bargaining born",As the society has a batch of the rich,Have let their children to a better school needs,Also produced the money,Secondly the school can put the money used in the development of the school,Including for poor students scholarships,This is in a few places for a greater degree of education fair.but,Pro see only the representation,But ignore the foreign university operation mechanism,First of all,This only happened in private university,A public university by the government are not allowed;secondly,The university of modern school system,Related charge"Bargaining born"decision,The college board to make,The standard of charge to the public in advance,Process transparent;again,School financial management transparency,To collect all the charges and expenses to the teachers and students and social public,To ensure that all the money is used.And it is so,For private universities charge a small amount of"Bargaining born",Public opinion has the same question,Some private schools has been canceled this practice.

　　我国非义务教育大中学校符合以上“条件”吗？就是私立学校，哪所学校实行现代学校制度？哪所学校的财务向师生和学校进行了公开？所以，在我国学校收取高价择校生，其结果是，滋生权势交易和教育腐败，收来的钱，并没有促进学校发展，用来设立奖学金，而是用以冲抵本来应该由政府投入的经费，或者进入少数管理者、办学者的腰包。

Our country is not compulsory education meets the above big school"conditions"??Is private schools,Which school practices modern school system?Which school to the teachers and students and school financial the public?so,In our school ZeJiaoSheng charge high prices,The result is,Breeding power trading and education corruption,Accept money,And not promoting the further development of the school,Used to set up a scholarship,But to charge against should the government investment funds,Or into a few managers/Pockets of operators.

　　所以，这根本不是什么“创新机制”，而是打着创新的旗号，推卸政府投入教育的责任，这也就使得择校热和择校费乱象一直难以得到有效的治理——政府部门成为择校利益链条的一环——真正的机制创新，在另外两方面，一是建立国家和地方教育拨款委员会，负责制订教育预算，并监督政府投入，目前我国的教育拨款是由政府部门说了算，这是教育投入不足、教育长期欠债的根源所在；二是建立社区教育委员会和学校理事会，负责教育管理和学校重大战略决策，在这种治理机制下，学校自主办学，校长必须对理事会和师生负责，每年公布学校包括财务信息在内的的详细办学信息，这就避免权力机构对学校办学的干扰，也就铲除权力择校、金钱择校的生存土壤。

so,It's not at all??????"Innovation mechanism",But under the banner of innovation,Shift the responsibility of the government investment education,It also makes heat and ZeJiaoFei school mess has been difficult to get effective governance, government departments will be interests chain link, the real mechanism innovation,In the other two aspects,One is the establishment of a national and local education appropriations committee,Responsible for establishing education budget,And supervise the government investment,At present our country's education funding is by government departments have the final say,This is insufficient investment in education/Education long-term debt of the source;The second is to establish a community education committee and the school board,Responsible for education management and school important strategic decision,In this kind of management mechanism,The school run independently,The principal must be responsible for the board of directors and the teachers and students,Published annually schools include financial information, the running of the detailed information,This avoids the authority of the school to interference,Will eradicate will power/The money will be the survival soil.