广受关注的“广州中考新政”实施已到“节骨眼”上。年初六，春节假期最后一天，两大“明星委员”———广东省政协常委孟浩和广州市政协委员韩志鹏聚在孟浩的社情民意接待室，就民间反响强烈的广州市中考“新政”问题进行研究，并在夜里22时许形成了最终方案：以“政协委员‘社情民意反映工作’专用笺”的形式，向广州市教育局发出《关于对广州2013年“中考新政”的主要意见和建议》。

Wide concern"Test the New Deal in guangzhou"Implementation has to"juncture"On the.In which,The last day of the lunar New Year holiday,Two big"Star member"-- - guangdong province standing committee of the Chinese people's political consultative conference Meng Hao and guangzhou CPPCC Han Zhipeng Meng Hao in public opinion of the reception room,Guangzhou city mid-term exam folk strong reactions"The New Deal"Problems in research,And 22 at night PM to form the final plan:In order to"Chinese people's political consultative conference committee‘Public opinion reflects the work’Dedicated a proverb"In the form of,From the education bureau in guangzhou[About guangzhou in 2013"Test the New Deal"The main ideas and Suggestions].

　“新政”实施时间有问题 "The New Deal"Time has a problem

　　当天下午，羊城晚报记者受邀前往采访。韩志鹏说，深入了解民意后，他十分关注广州中考新政，为此写过时评、接受过采访，也发过微博。韩志鹏和孟浩认为：新政总体方向是对的，但实施时间有问题。孟浩说，看了2月8日的媒体报道，留意到韩志鹏对广州中考新政有看法，“当时我就想春节后第一时间和韩志鹏研究这个问题”。孟浩还专门请了珠海老周前来一同研究，老周的女儿赶上了当年“珠海中考新政”的第一年，因此对相关问题深有体会。

In the afternoon,Yangcheng evening news reporter invited to interview.Han Zhipeng said,After thorough understanding public opinion,He is very attention to test the New Deal in guangzhou,To write out of date/interviewed,Also send a weibo.Han Zhipeng and Meng Hao think:The New Deal overall direction is right,But there is something wrong with the time.Meng Hao said,Look at the media reported on February 8,Pay attention to the Han Zhipeng ideas about guangzhou test the New Deal,"At that time, I like the Spring Festival after the first time and Han Zhipeng research this problem".Meng Hao also specially invited zhuhai Lao zhou to come and study together,Lao zhou daughter caught in those days"Zhuhai examination of the New Deal"In the first year of,So the related problem.

　　这份以“政协委员‘社情民意反映工作’专用笺”的形式，向广州市教育局发出的《关于对广州2013年“中考新政”的主要意见和建议》(简称“意见”)，落款为孟浩和韩志鹏。

This in order to"Chinese people's political consultative conference committee‘Public opinion reflects the work’Dedicated a proverb"In the form of,From the education bureau in guangzhou[About guangzhou in 2013"Test the New Deal"The main ideas and Suggestions](Hereinafter referred to as"opinion"),With Meng Hao and Han Zhipeng.

　　两人在“意见”中说，考试制度的改革创新，广大家长是赞同并拥护的。但是，新的中考政策即将在今年中考时立即实施，不仅时间比较仓促，而且还会造成明显的社会不公。因为，距离中考报名只有短短4个月的时间，而且新政还没有“二级分配”、“一级分配”的具体方案，新政势必会对在读初中生,尤其是即将中考的学生造成不公平影响。因为他们是在旧的政策背景下升入初中或考入(或择校)优质初中的。

Two people in the"opinion"In the said,Examination system reform and innovation,Most parents are endorsed and supported.but,When the new examination examination this year to implement immediately,Not only time is rush,But also will cause the obvious social injustice.Because of the,Distance tests with only four months,And the New Deal yet"The secondary distribution"/"Primary distribution"Detailed scheme,New Deal is bound to reading junior middle school students,Especially unfair influence the middle school students.Because they are under the background of the old policy in junior or entered(Select a school or)The high quality junior high school.

　　“意见”说，改革要有连续性而不是“突变”。新政的实施要“以德服人”，要让学生和家长有个准备、抉择的余地。从《意见》出台至今，应届考生的家长们不断到省、市政府和省教育厅、市教育局等上访、静坐，甚至在网上以书面签名的方式来表示反对“中考新政”等，都说明“突变”的结果只能是激发社会矛盾和引发社会事件。

"opinion"said,Should have continuity rather than reform"Mutations in the".The implementation of the New Deal"Good for him",To make students and parents have a preparation/Room for choice.From the[opinion]Come so far,This year's examinee parents constantly to the province/The municipal government and the provincial education department/City bureau of education and other petitioners/Sit still,Even on the Internet to oppose in the form of a written signature"Test the New Deal", etc.,All instructions"Mutations in the"Results can only inspire social contradictions and social events.

“指标招生”步子可更大 "Indicators of admissions"Steps can be more

　　关于指标招生的问题，两位委员认为，“意见”说，社会普遍认为：指标生的改革方向是值得肯定的。在广东省的其他城市，诸如珠海、东莞等都早已实施并且取得了成功，在减少初中阶段的择校现象、平衡教育资源方面所起的作用是积极的。因此说这个方向是完全正确的。

Questions about the index admissions,Two members think,"opinion"said,Society is commonly thought that:Indicators of reform direction is positive.In other cities in guangdong province,Such as zhuhai/Dongguan is already implemented and achieved success,Decrease in junior middle school stage, the phenomenon of school choice/Balance the role of the education resources are positive.Therefore said that the direction is completely correct.

　　但是，对照广州市的“中考新政”，我们同时也认为，广州市在此问题的改革上步子迈得实在太小，30%的优质学位比例显然太少。仅以珠海市为例：珠海市目前中考的指标生比例已经由最初的40%提高到现在的70%，并且其优质高中的高考升学率却没有因此而降低，相反却是在逐年提高。过于低的指标生比例，对促进广州市的教育改革效果不会很明显。广州市作为此项改革的后启动者，完全可以借鉴省内其他的已经先行改革城市的成功经验，把改革的步子迈得更大一些。

but,Comparison of guangzhou"Test the New Deal",We also think the,Guangzhou have gone on this question of reform was too small,30% the proportion of high quality degree is too little.Only in zhuhai, for example:Zhuhai current examination index ratio is from the original 40% to 70% now,And the quality of high school graduation rates in the college entrance examination did not reduce because of this,Instead it is increase year by year.The target is too low to live,To promote the education reform of guangzhou effect not very obvious.Guangzhou as after the start of the reform,Can draw lessons from the successful experience of other has advance the reform of cities in the province,The reforms have gone further.

　“分区招生”方向错了 "Partition the admissions"The wrong direction

　　“意见”称，如果我们说指标生的改革方向是正确的话，那么分区招生的改革，则完全是方向性的错误。

"opinion"According to,If we say the index of reform direction is correct,Then partitions the reform of enrollment,Is wrong direction.

　　很显然，作为本次新政改革的一个重要部分，分区招生目的和用意就是为了保护既得利益者们的利益不受损失。这样的改革，当然不会得到社会的普遍认可。改革的目的，应该是让公共资源更开放、让社会更包容、让教育更公平而不是相反。分区招生，显然违背了以上原则与主张，转而将缘于政府原因所造成的教育不公平现状进一步通过所谓的“政策改革”固化下来。这样的“改革”，我们认为不能称之为改革，而是一种倒退。

obviously,As an important part of the New Deal reform,Partition recruit students purpose and the purpose is to protect the vested interests are the interests of the loss.Such reforms,Of course not get general recognition of the society.The purpose of the reform,Public resources should be more open/Let the society more inclusive/Make education more fair and not the other way round.Partition the admissions,Obviously violates the above principles and advocated,Will instead due to reasons caused by the government further by the so-called education unfair situation"Policy reform"Curing down.Such a"The reform",We think not reform,But a step backward.

　　征求意见不能“走过场”

Comment cannot be"Go through the motions"

　　“意见”还提出了“关于‘征求意见’ 的诚意与否问题”。“意见”说，当《意见》还是公示阶段时，身为广州市教育局局长的屈哨兵先生就放话说出两个不可能：一是不可能照顾每一个(学生)，二是不可能延期执行(“中考新政”)。如果“这也不可能，那也不可能”，那你们为什么还要设置什么所谓的“10天征求意见期”呢？这不是“走过场”、忽悠老百姓，又是什么呢？显然“征求意见”的诚意是不足的。

"opinion"Also proposed"about‘For advice’ Sincerity or not"."opinion"said,when[opinion]Or the public stage,As director of guangzhou city bureau of education of the flexor Mr Sentry put words out of two isn't possible:It is impossible to take care of every one(students),2 it is impossible to stay of execution("Test the New Deal").if"This is not possible,It is impossible",Then why did you set up the so-called"Ten days for advice"??This is not"Go through the motions"/Fool the people,What is??clearly"For advice"Sincerity is enough.

　新政应有“三年预告期” The New Deal should be"Forecast period of three years"

　　孟浩和韩志鹏建议：对“中考新政”实施的具体时间进行充分的论证。

Meng Hao and Han Zhipeng advice:for"Test the New Deal"Implementation of the specific time for case well.

　　孟浩和韩志鹏认为，“中考新政”应该给社会一个完整的三年预告期，让广大家长有充分的时间来理解、消化和支持新政，让所有参与教育改革的社会各个层面做好完全而充分的“精神和物质”准备，尽量不要因为新政的实施给社会制造新的不公平。而三年后实施新政，也就让预防“故意突击转学”的相关条例，有了可实施的客观基础。否则，预设的防止“故意突击转学”的条例，势必误伤目前在校的正当转学的孩子们。

Meng Hao and Han Zhipeng think,"Test the New Deal"Should give the society a full notice period of three years,Let parents have plenty of time to understand/Digestion and supported the New Deal,To make all ready to fully participate in the education reform of the levels and sufficient"Spiritual and material"Ready to,As far as possible don't because of the implementation of the New Deal to make new unfair society.And three years after the implementation of the New Deal,Also let prevention"Intentional assault your transfer"The relevant regulations,There is a implementation of the objective basis.otherwise,Default to prevent"Intentional assault your transfer"The regulations,Is injured the legitimate transfer in school children.

　　孟浩和韩志鹏还提出：中考不能分区招生。他们认为：广州市行政区域内的每一所高中都应该向全市中考学生开放，并由应届毕业学生自主选择。同时将区级的示范高中也纳入到优质学位中来，一起参加指标招生计划，给更多的学生以升入优质学校的机会。

Meng Hao and Han Zhipeng also put forward:Admissions tests can't partitions.They think that:Every high school in guangzhou city administrative area should be open to the whole city middle school students,And by the fresh graduate students' choice.At the same time, the district-level demonstration high schools have also incorporated into the quality degree,Join target enrollment plan,Give more chances for students to get to high school.

　听民意办人民满意的教育 Do people's satisfactory education listening to public opinion

　　孟浩和韩志鹏说，“中考新政”需要体现的是教育公平。“我们坚持认为：凡涉及公共利益的重要决策必须要充分发扬民主参与和坚持科学论证原则。只有‘坚持民主，听取民意’，才能办好广州市人民满意的教育！希望我们的教育部门诚心诚意地听取和吸纳社会各方面意见而不是走过场”。(记者张演钦)

Meng Hao and Han Zhipeng said,"Test the New Deal"Need to embody the education fair."We insist that:Important decisions involving the public interest must be full democracy participation and adhere to the principle of scientific reasoning.only‘democracy,Listen to public opinion’,To do a good job in guangzhou people's satisfactory education!Sincerely hope our education department to listen to and absorb the social various aspects opinions rather than go through the motions".(Reporter zhang in chin)