2010年6月，施一公在实验室做实验。近日，施一公当选美国科学院外籍院士。此前他曾落选中国科学院院士。

2010年6月,Shi did experiments in the lab.In recent days,Shi was elected foreign academician of the national academy of sciences.此前他曾落选In the国科学院academician.

对施一公当选美国院士“感到高兴”；施一公此前或因国籍问题落选中科院院士 Shi was elected member of the United States"happy";施一公此前或因国籍问题落选In the科院academician

争议 controversy

　　近日，清华大学生命科学学院院长施一公等三位中国科学家当选了美国科学院外籍院士。施一公此前曾在中国科学院院士评选过程中落选，因此引发网络热议。

In recent days,清华大学生命科学学院院长施一公等三位In the国科学家当选了美国科学院外籍academician.施一公此前曾在In the国科学院academician评选过程In the落选,So cause Internet debate.

回应 In response to

　　中科院有关负责人昨日表示，中国科学院和美国科学院是两个独立的学术组织，其院士增选分别按照各自的程序和标准进行，两者是相互独立的，没有必然的关联。

In the科院有关负责人昨日表示,In the国科学院和美国科学院是两个独立的学术组织,Its members co-opted respectively carried out in accordance with the respective procedures and standards,The two are independent of each other,Not necessarily associated.

域外 outside

　　美国科学院外籍院士、中国科学院院士周忠和表示，中国社会给院士附加的东西太多。美国科学院的外籍院士不用交会费，但本国院士要交钱，开会的钱也要自己出，院士只不过是一种荣誉，大家看得很淡。

美国科学院外籍academician/In the国科学院academician周忠和表示,In the国社会给academician附加的东西太多.Foreign academician of the national academy of sciences don't have to pay the membership fee,But its members to make money,Money also want to out of the meeting,Member is just a kind of honor,You look very pale.

　　新京报讯 （记者金煜 郭少峰）针对曾落选中国科学院院士的施一公当选美国科学院外籍院士一事，中科院有关负责人昨日表示，对三位中国科学家当选美国科学院外籍院士感到高兴，两国院士评选并无必然关联。

新京报讯 (The reporter Jin Yu Guo Shaofeng)针对曾落选In the国科学院academician的Shi was elected foreign academician of the national academy of sciences一事,In the科院有关负责人昨日表示,对三位In the国科学家当选美国科学院外籍academicianhappy,The two countries academician selection is not necessarily linked.

中美院士评选相互独立 In the美academician评选相互独立

　　近日，清华大学生命科学学院院长施一公等三位中国科学家当选美国科学院外籍院士。中科院有关负责人昨日表示，对于中国科学家当选美国科学院外籍院士“感到高兴”。

In recent days,清华大学生命科学学院院长施一公等三位In the国科学家当选美国科学院外籍academician.In the科院有关负责人昨日表示,对于In the国科学家当选美国科学院外籍academician"happy".

　　施一公此前曾在中国科学院院士评选过程中落选，因此引发网络热议。在回应曾落选中国院士却当选美国院士的争议时，中科院有关负责人称，中国科学院和美国科学院是两个独立的学术组织，其院士增选分别按照各自的程序和标准进行，两者是相互独立的，没有必然的关联。“例如在中国有许多被国际公认的杰出科学家，也不是美国科学院的外籍院士。”

施一公此前曾在In the国科学院academician评选过程In the落选,So cause Internet debate.在In response to曾落选In the国academician却当选美国academician的controversy时,In the科院有关负责人称,In the国科学院和美国科学院是两个独立的学术组织,Its members co-opted respectively carried out in accordance with the respective procedures and standards,The two are independent of each other,Not necessarily associated."例如在In the国有许多被国际公认的杰出科学家,Nor is it a foreign member of the national academy of sciences."

　　该负责人说，中科院院士增选工作整个过程都严格按照院士章程和增选细则进行。“每个学部的院士是由各自学部的全体与会院士经过通信评审和会议评审无记名投票选举产生，然后再经确认、审批和备案等后续环节。任何个人和工作机构都不应该也不会影响增选过程和结果。”

该负责人说,In the科院academician增选工作整个过程都严格按照academician章程和增选细则进行."Member of each department by each department of all the member of the ballot after a communication audit and review meeting,And then confirmed/Subsequent link such as examination and approval and for the record.All personal and work institution should not and will not affect their process and result."

　　该负责人表示，中科院长期以来一直把公平、公正的原则贯彻到院士增选过程之中。“我们仍在进一步研究和提出深化改进完善院士制度的措施，有关工作也在不断推进之中。”该负责人还表示感谢社会各界对中科院学部和院士增选工作的关注和支持，欢迎社会各界进行监督，同时呼吁理性对待院士这一荣誉性学术称号。

该负责人表示,In the科院长期以来一直把公平/公正的原则贯彻到academician增选过程之In the."We are still in the further research and deepen the improvement measures to perfect the academician system is put forward,有关工作也在不断推进之In the."该负责人还表示感谢社会各界对In the科院学部和academician增选工作的关注和支持,Welcome to supervise the social from all walks of life,Also called for the rational treatment of academician the honourable academic titles.

施一公成美双料院士 Shi to beauty double academicians

　　施一公近日先后当选为美国科学院和美国人文与科学学院的外籍院士，而在2011年中科院院士评选中，他和另一位在生命科学学界享有很高声誉的北大生命科学学院院长饶毅双双落选。

施一公In recent days先后当选为美国科学院和美国人文与科学学院的外籍academician,而在2011年In the科院academician评选In the,He and another in the life science community enjoys a high reputation of rao yi, dean of school of life science both lost.

　　有接近中科院学部院士工作局的人士向新京报记者表示，此前施一公和饶毅落选院士，并非外界批评的中国院士更看重对本国贡献的标准问题，也不存在暗箱操作等程序问题，而是因为两人的国籍问题。

有接近In the科院学部academician工作局的人士向新京报记者表示,After unsuccessfully in academician shi and rao,并非外界批评的In the国academician更看重对本国贡献的标准问题,Black-box scheduler does not exist in the problem,But because the nationality of the two problems.

　　该人士表示，两人此前申请院士时，中国国籍办理程序尚未完全，有院士拒绝投票，因此导致落选。这位人士表示，施一公的国籍问题已经解决，他在新一轮院士增选中很有可能被评上。

该人士表示,After two people apply for academician,In the国国籍办理程序尚未完全,Academicians have refused to vote,So lead to lost.The source said,Shi nationality problem has been solved,他在新一轮academician增选In the很有可能被评上.

　　有中科院内部人士对新京报记者表示，我国目前院士制度的确存在需要改革的地方，但大的变化需要配合国家层面的科技制度改革进行。目前的院士选举机制，首先要确保既有的制度完善及选举公平，现在的院士评选就程序而言并无问题。

有In the科院内部人士对新京报记者表示,Academician system in our country at present there is a need to reform,But big changes in the need to comply with national level science and technology system reform.Member of the election mechanism,First of all to ensure that the existing system of perfect and fair election,Member of the selection process is concerned, there is no problem now.

链接 link

“院士在美国仅是一种荣誉” "Academician is only a kind of honor in the United States"

周忠和称美国院士开会自己掏钱 Zhou said the meeting member of the United States out of their own pockets

　　美国科学院外籍院士、中国科学院院士周忠和表示，每个国家院士的评选，既有相同点也有不同点，而且会或多或少受到一些科学意外因素的影响。比如某段时间国家可能希望院士更加年轻些，这时一些年龄大的候选人可能就评不上。国情不同，没有必要将不同国家的院士评选放在一起对比。

美国科学院外籍academician/In the国科学院academician周忠和表示,Each country member selection,Has both similarities and differences,And it will more or less affected by some accidental factors science.Such as a certain period of time may hope academicians more younger,At this time some older candidates may review.Different national conditions,There is no need to put together the academician selection of different countries.

　　周忠和强调，中国社会给院士附加的东西太多。美国科学院的院士头衔是纯粹的荣誉，美国外籍院士不用交会费，但本国院士要交钱，开会也要自己掏钱。在美国，院士没有太多附加内容，只不过是一种荣誉，所以大家看得很淡。

周忠和强调,In the国社会给academician附加的东西太多.Of the national academy of sciences of the title of academician is pure glory,U.S. foreign academicians don't have to pay the membership fee,But its members to make money,Also want to pay for the meeting.In the United States,Academician without too much additional content,Just a kind of honor,So you look very pale.

　　周忠和坦言，中国的院士制度有需要完善的地方，其中一个方面就是推荐渠道。现在的渠道太多，学会、行业、部门、省份都可以推荐，这会使院士获得很高的社会关注度，也会产生很多争议。

周忠和坦言,In the国的academician制度有需要完善的地方,其In the一个方面就是推荐渠道.Too many channels now,Learn to/industry/Department of/Provinces can be recommended,This will make academicians have very high social attention,Also can produce a lot of controversy.

　　周忠和认为，院士评审多一些渠道出发点可能是为了更公平，或者考虑某些平衡，但实际效果上通常做不到；对院士候选人的公示制度，出发点是好的，但这种“大张旗鼓”的方式容易催生对“院士”的盲目崇拜，容易催生科学界的浮躁。美国在评审院士时也会考虑一些学术之外的东西，比如妇女、地区等，但这些都是次要因素，评选最终还是依靠院士投票。所以，院士评选可以尽量简化提名制度，减少行政影响，让科学家来掌握院士评选。新京报记者 金煜

周忠和认为,Academician review starting point may be more channels for more fair,Or consider some balance,But the actual effect usually can't do;Publicity system of academician candidates,The starting point is good,But this kind of"high-profile"Way too easily lead to"academician"The blind worship,Too easily lead to impetuous of the scientific community.The member of the review will consider something beyond the academic,Such as women's/Areas, etc.,But these are secondary factors,Eventually rely on members to vote.so,Academician system for nominating the selection can be simplified as much as possible,Reduce the impact,Allow scientists to master academician selection.The Beijing news reporter Jin Yu

　　中国的院士不仅是荣誉，而且具有政策咨询功能，起着辅助决策的作用。现阶段，院士制度是有必要的，它有利于平衡官场的官僚主义，通过专家参与决策的方式，对政府部门的决策起到纠正、辅助的作用。我们国家的院士不是要冲锋陷阵，不是强调做第一线的科研，而是来判断决策、课题方向。从这个功能定位来看，在院士制度上附加的一些东西是需要的，我们不能把院士制度打倒。中科院科技政策研究所研究员王铮

In the国的academician不仅是荣誉,And has the policy advisory function,Plays an assistant decision-making role.At this stage,Academician system is necessary,It is helpful to balance the government bureaucracy,By experts to participate in decision making,Correct in terms of government decision-making/The role of secondary.Member of our country is not to remember the titans,Do not emphasis on the first line of research,But to judge the decision/Subject direction.From this function,On the academician system something additional is needed,We can't put the academician system down.In the科院科技政策研究所研究员王铮

　　施一公之前落选中国科学院院士只是个案，不能说明这是普遍问题。施一公评选时刚从国外回来，这可能对他的评选有一些影响，但就院士评选制度来说，我感觉还是比较完善。把中国的院士评选和美国的院士评选进行比较很荒唐，两国国情不一样，我们的院士制度和评选才搞了几年，不可能一步就做到理想化，事实上大部分评上的院士都是国内顶级的科学家，对国内科研起支撑作用的。中科院院士，清华大学物理系教授薛其坤

施一公之前落选In the国科学院academician只是个案,Don't tell this is a common problem.When shi selection has just returned from abroad,This may have some influence on his list,But as for academician selection system,I feel is perfect.把In the国的academician评选和美国的academician评选进行比较很荒唐,Is not the same as the state of the two countries,We of the academician system and the selection to make for a few years,Can't step is idealized,In fact most of those academicians are domestic leading scientists,On the domestic scientific research supporting role.In the科院academician,Department of physics, tsinghua university professor Xue Jikun