近日，出席全国政协会议的中国工程院常务副院长潘云鹤表示，根据章程，工程院不会主动撤销“烟草院士”谢剑平的资格。在记者追问下，潘副院长表示，工程院正在对谢剑平做劝退工作，但对方不接受。“烟草院士”事件从曝光到现在时间不短了，却还陷入僵局之中，着实叫人无奈。

近日,出席全国政协会议的In the国work程院常务副院长潘云鹤表示,According to the articles of association,work程院不会主动撤销"Member of the tobacco"Xie Jianping qualification.Pressed by reporters over,, vice President of the pan said,work程院正在对谢剑平做劝退work作,But the other party does not accept."Member of the tobacco"Events from exposure to the present time is not short,却还陷入僵局之In the,Really helpless.

　　 “烟草院士”是在一路争议中成为院士的。公示有争议，当选有争议，劝退也有争议。这边吵着“烟草院士”研究领域与国家控烟战略自相矛盾，还有人质疑其学术成果成色不足，那边却一路走程序，过关斩将，荣膺院士，修成正果。现在倒好，工程院进退失据，“烟草院士”本人不好过，围观质疑的人也给不出个周全的法子。因为烟草，所以尴尬。程序正义和实体正义打架，最后的结果就是大家都难受。

"Member of the tobacco"是在一路争议In the成为院士的.Published a controversial,Disputed election,Stop is also controversial.Noisy here"Member of the tobacco"Research field and conflicting national tobacco control strategy,Others questioned in assaying the fineness of their academic achievements,There is all the way walk program,Through a,Selected member,Being together.now,work程院进退失据,"Member of the tobacco"I having a hard time,Onlookers to question people also give out a comprehensive way.Because tobacco,So embarrassed.Procedural justice and entity justice to fight,The end result is everyone sad.

　　 争议多，是因为道理讲不通。说实话，工程院院士作为一种至高无上的终身荣誉，怎么可能有人愿意主动请辞？人家按照正常合法的程序当选了，现在又叫人退出，怎么说也都有点没道理，这岂不是把院士评选当儿戏？将争议人物延揽入院，之后一路争议不断，那简直是一定的。早知现在，何必当初。工程院在“烟草院士”这件事上，显然失分不少，既显示出在听取不同声音、平衡各方意见的把握能力上存在欠缺，又反映出院士评选制度和事后纠偏机制存在疏漏。

争议多,Because the reason doesn't make sense.To tell the truth,work程院院士作为一种至高无上的终身荣誉,How could someone willing to take the initiative to resign?According to the normal legal procedures was elected,Now, exit,How to say it is a little unreasonable,This is not the academician selection as child's play?The controversial figure in hospital,After all the controversy,It is certain.If I had known now,Why at the beginning.work程院在"Member of the tobacco"On this matter,Obviously lose points many,Both shows in to listen to different voice/Balancing the opinion on the grasp of have defects,And reflect the academician system and correction mechanism exists omission later.

　　 从现在的僵局看，这种制度缺陷更令人担忧。对于“烟草院士”，不管是院方劝退，还是自我请辞，不管是有没有道理，并非完全无解。但评选制度存有疏漏，事后又缺乏相应的纠偏机制，即便解决了今天这一桩个例，却难保今后不会再出现别的什么争议院士。这几年，外界对院士制度建设和改革高度关注，对一些不良现象也颇有微词，应该对科学院、工程院产生触动甚至震动才对。作为中国科技和工程技术领域的最高荣誉性、咨询性学术机构，两院应该有更开放的姿态和更宽阔的胸怀，应该放下身段，多听听公众的意见和批评。

从现在的僵局看,The system defect is more worrying.for"Member of the tobacco",Whether the hospital stop,Or resigned myself,Whether is there any reason,Is not completely without a solution.But the selection system exists omission,Afterwards is lack of the corresponding correction mechanism,Even solved this one alone,But because member of what other dispute will not happen again in future.Over the past few years,High attention of academician system construction and reform,For some bad phenomenon,Should be to the academy of sciences/work程院产生触动甚至震动才对.作为In the国科技和work程技术领域的最高荣誉性/Sent to academic institutions,There should be a more open posture and the two big heart,Should put down the figure,Listen to public opinion and criticism.

　　 “烟草院士”事件不能老是这么僵下去，更不能不了了之。既要程序合法合规，也要在实质上合情合理，最终找出一个让院方、当事人和外界都能接受的解决方案，这好似一出“智慧闯关”。大家伙都来动动脑子吧！ (毛晓刚)

"Member of the tobacco"Events can't always so rigid,More can't go away.Both legal and compliance program,Also want to physically reasonable,Finally find a to the hospital/Solution that is acceptable to both parties and the outside world,This is like a"Wisdom stage mode".Let everybody move brain! (Mao Xiaogang)