客观而言，李卫东教授对南开大学“博士学位挂钩论文”这一“土政策”表达自己的强烈不满和抵制，是对绑架式的论文发表制度的拷问。按常理来说，一个博士生只要通过了毕业论文答辩，学校规定的课程的学业成绩也合格，而且没有严重的违法违纪行为，即可授予博士学位。至于博士就读期间是否发表个人论文，则不是必要指标。

Objective in，LiWeiDong to nankai university professor“Ph.D. Thesis hook”this“TuZhengCe”Express their strong dissatisfaction and boycott，Is to kidnap type of papers published system of torture。Dr Morrison said，A doctoral as long as through the graduation thesis reply，The school rules of the academic performance of course also qualified，And there is no serious illegal indiscipline，Can be awarded a doctoral degree。As for studying whether dr during personal papers published，It is not necessary to index。

　　“博士学位挂钩论文”的做法来自哪里？2004年8月28日起施行的《中华人民共和国学位条例》，第六条明确规定，“高等学校和科学研究机构的研究生，或具有研究生毕业同等学力的人员，通过博士学位的课程考试和论文答辩，成绩合格，达到下述学术水平者，授予博士学位：（一）在本门学科上掌握坚实宽广的基础理论和系统深入的专门知识；（二）具有独立从事科学研究工作的能力；（三）在科学或专门技术上做出创造性的成果。显然，大学“博士学位挂钩论文”的“土政策”，是对“独立研究能力”、“创造性成果”的粗糙量化，隐含着一种简单粗放的“学术GDP”思维。

“Ph.D. Thesis hook”Practice from？August 28, 2004 promulgation《Degree regulations of the People's Republic of China》，Article 6 the explicitly，“Institutions of higher learning and scientific research institutions graduate student，Or have a graduate student to graduate the personnel of coequal educational level，Dr. Through the curricular exam of degree and paper rejoin，Achievement qualification，To achieve the following the academic level，Awarded a doctoral degree：（a）In this subject to the firm and broad basic theory and system in-depth expertise；（two）With independent engaged in scientific research ability；（three）In science or specialized technology to make creative achievements。obviously，university“Ph.D. Thesis hook”of“TuZhengCe”，Is to“Independent study ability”、“Creative achievements”Rough quantitative，Implied a simple extensive“Academic GDP”thinking。

　　李卫东教授的态度并不是特例，有不少博导和博士生也持与他类似的观点。在理工类知识分子密集聚集的“科学网”上，众多网友在这个新闻页面下发表的评论，足以印证李卫东教授的这一意见的确具有广泛的民意基础。为了顺利毕业、拿到学位，博士生被迫增加学术“产能”，导师也不得不帮助博士生疏通关系发表论文。这毫无疑问助长了粗制滥造、抄袭剽窃、买卖造假等学术不正之风，严重危害了学术的健康发展。

LiWeiDong professor attitude and are not exceptions to the rule，There are many doctoral and doctoral theses and he has a similar point of view。In science &engineering intellectuals of dense gathered together“Science nets”on，Many users in this news page down comments，Enough to confirm LiWeiDong professor this ideas have extensive public base。In order to successfully graduate、degrees，Doctoral was forced to increase academic“capacity”，They have also had to help doctoral dredge relationship published。This no doubt contributed to the rough way、plagiarism、Buying and selling fake academic unhealthy tendencies, etc，Serious harm the academic health development。

　　在“与国际接轨”、“建设世界一流大学”成为高等教育目标的情况下，“博士学位挂钩论文”明显是一道逆流。许多西方知名大学，并无必须在什么档次的期刊上发表多少篇论文才能获得博士学位的要求。并且，事实上，欧美一些研究做得很好的博士，也没有把他们的博士学位论文或其中的一部分拿出去发表。但是，因为他们的研究具有开创性，所以即使没有公开发表，被引用的次数照样很多。两相比较，我国的大学盲目地为了追求“学术GDP”和所谓的“影响因子”，以学位胁迫博士生在核心期刊上发表论文，这既违逆学术研究的自身规律，也造成了一种畸形的人才培养模式。

in“And the international community”、“Build a world class university”For higher education target，“Ph.D. Thesis hook”Obviously is a counter-current。Many western famous university，And no must in what class issue of the journal how much paper to obtain a doctor's degree requirements。and，In fact，American and European research do very good doctor，May not have their Ph.D. Thesis or part of published take out。but，Because their research groundbreaking，So even if not published，The number of times is quoted so many。The comparison between，The universities in our country in order to pursue the blindly“Academic GDP”And so-called“Impact factor”，To stress doctoral degree in core journals published，This is the inherent laws of academic research violations，Also creates a deformity of the talent training mode。

　　为了发表而发表的学术论文，其学术价 值可想而知。“博士学位挂钩论文”当休，“学术GDP”思维当休，如此，才能让学术研究和人才发展回归其自然规律。(胡乐乐)

For publication and the academic papers published，Its academic price Value can be imagined。“Ph.D. Thesis hook”When Hugh，“Academic GDP”Thinking when Hugh，so，To make academic research and development of talent back to the nature。(Hu le le)