厦大教授的博士学位是假的，让很多人诧异：堂堂厦大，居然被持有假博士学位者轻松欺骗，更重要的是，要不是方舟子爆料，这起造假丑闻不知还要被掩盖多长时间。从2004年至今长达8年的时间里，傅瑾的博士学位造假，厦大校方怎能毫不知情？

Xiamen university professor of doctor's degree is false，Let the many people by surprise：Open at xiamen university，Incredibly hold off the doctor's degree easy cheat，More important is，If it weren't for fang leaks，The fraud scandal don't know how long it will be covered。From 2004 to now for eight years in time，FuJin the doctoral degree fraud，How can the school knew nothing at xiamen university？

　　厦大方面的解释是，傅瑾2004年应聘厦大讲座教授时，提供了假的博士文凭，但没被鉴别出。按照教育部规定，海外应聘者的文凭必须经过中国驻外使领馆公证，但厦大医学院当时认为，傅瑾应聘的只是每年一个月的讲座教授，并非全职教授，就没有严格按照规定程序审核。2008年，傅瑾应聘厦大全职教授，因她已和厦大合作了4年，所以学校没有对她提供的证书等做进一步的严格审核。

The explanation is at xiamen university，Apply for FuJin 2004 at xiamen university professor lecture，Provides false Ph.D certificate，But is not identified。According to the regulation of ministry of education，Overseas applicants must pass the diploma notarized Chinese embassies and consulates，But at xiamen university medical school thought，FuJin apply for each year of just a month of lecture professor，Is not a full professor，There is no in strict accordance with the prescribed procedure audits。2008 years，FuJin apply for full professors at xiamen university，Because she has and xiamen university cooperation by four years，So the school is not the certificate provided to her and make further scrutiny。

　　现在，真相大白于天下，厦大校方也对傅瑾做了处理。但是，这事不能就此草草了结，还应有进一步的追问和思考。一是当初引进傅瑾时，在程序上，厦大有关方面和工作人员为何没有严格按照教育部要求审查外国学位的有关规定进行？不按规定操作的情况是否还广泛存在？二是8年来傅瑾的博士学位造假一直未被发现，是主管者玩忽职守，还是有意包庇？如是前者，则可称渎职；如是后者，则自然不能排除其中有利益输送和交换，是否应该启动对人才引进和人事工作的问责机制？三是厦大能否因傅瑾事件建立完善的预防排查机制，封堵人才引进的程序漏洞，确保今后不再发生类似事件？

now，The truth is out in the world，The xiamen university to FuJin done deal。but，It can't finish this carelessly，Also should have the further questioning and thinking。One is the first FuJin introduction，In the procedure，Xiamen university relevant side and staff strictly according to the ministry of education asks why not review the relevant provisions of the foreign degree？Not according to the rules of operation conditions are also widely exist？2 it is 8 years FuJin the doctoral degree fraud has not be found，The date is dereliction of duty，Or intentionally shield？If the former，Can be called malfeasance；If the latter，The natural can't rule out there are benefits transportation and exchange，Whether should start to talent introduction and personnel work of accountability mechanism？3 it is because of FuJin events at xiamen university can build perfect testing prevention mechanism，Blocking talent introduction program holes，Ensure that no longer something similar happened in the future？

　　近年来，不少大学争相出重金在海外挖人，这种心态给少数造假者提供了难得的机会个别大学的具体负责人持“先引进了再说”的功利心态，引进后也不做博士学位、科研论文、个人品行等方面的核实与公示，结果一再被曝出造假丑闻。从一个个典型事件中，各所大学真的应该认真吸取教训。(胡乐乐)

In recent years，Many university out to dig out in overseas，This mentality to a minority of the fraudsters provides the rare opportunity to the university of individual of specific hold“First introduced the first”Utilitarian attitude，After introducing and don't do doctor's degree、Research papers、Personal character, and other aspects of the verification and the public，The result has been to expose fraud scandal。From a typical case，Universities should really seriously drawing lessons from。(Hu le le)